Re: Join Scoring

NRT readers, or opens them rarely, perhaps that cost is a good tradeoff to get faster joins. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:10 AM, anand chandak wrote: Re-posting... Thanks, Anand On 2/12/2014 10:55 AM, anand chandak wrote: Thanks David, really h

Re: Join Scoring

Re-posting... Thanks, Anand On 2/12/2014 10:55 AM, anand chandak wrote: Thanks David, really helpful response. You mentioned that if we have to add scoring support in solr then a possible approach would be to add a custom QueryParser, which might be taking Lucene's JOIN module. I

Re: Join Scoring

of the query are not available to be returned in search results, just the "to" side. Yup; that's true. To remedy this, you might write a Solr SearchComponent that adds fields from the "from" side. That could be tricky to do; it would probably need to re-run the fr

Re: solr joins

Thanks Mikhail, curious why was scoring left out of solr ? And if there's any plan to port it ? Also, if you can please elaborate on the segmented vs toplevel Thanks, Anand On 2/7/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: Basically, i am trying to understand where and how solr joins differ from

Re: Join Scoring

Resending, if somebody can please respond. Thanks, Anand On 2/5/2014 6:26 PM, anand chandak wrote: Hi, Having a question on join score, why doesn't the solr join query return the scores. Looking at the code, I see there's JoinScorer defined in the JoinQParserPlugin class ?

Join Scoring

Hi Why doesn't the solr join query doesn't return the score when returning the response. Although I see JoinScorer in the JoinQParserPlugin class ? Also, to evaluate the join performance, I filed a join query aganist solr's join - JoinQParserPlugin and aganist lucene JoinUtil.createJoinQu

Re: solr joins

Re-posting, just in case if this one fell through crack. Thanks, Anand On 2/1/2014 12:48 PM, anand chandak wrote: Folks, have a basic question regarding solr join, the wiki, <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join> states : - "Fields or other properties of the documents being joined

solr joins

Folks, have a basic question regarding solr join, the wiki, states : - "Fields or other properties of the documents being joined "from" are not available for use in processing of the resulting set of "to" documents (ie: you can not return fields in the "from

Lucene Join

Hi, I am trying to find whether the lucene joins (not solr join) if they are using any filter cache. The API that lucene uses is for joining joinutil.createjoinquery(), where can I find the source code for this API. Thanks in advance Thanks, Anand

Re: Copying Index

You might review: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists Best, Erick On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 AM, anand chandak wrote: Folks, any response to below query would be highly appreciated Thanks, Anand On 1/10/2014 11:04 AM, anand chandak wrote: Hi, I am testing repl

Re: Copying Index

Folks, any response to below query would be highly appreciated Thanks, Anand On 1/10/2014 11:04 AM, anand chandak wrote: Hi, I am testing replication feature of solr 4.x with large index, unfortunately, that index that we had was 3.x format. So to conver that into 4.x I copied (file

Copying Index

Hi, I am testing replication feature of solr 4.x with large index, unfortunately, that index that we had was for 3.x format. So I copied the index file and ran the upgrade index utility to convert it to 4.x format. The utility did, what it is suppose to do and I 4.x index (verified it with

Solr Replication Index directory disappears

Hi, We are using solr 4.4 version and am facing some issue with replication, we are trying to replicate very large index about 105G. Once the replication is done, I see the index. directory but the index directory is not present ? Why is this happening ? Also, I see with every iteration t

Re: Replication Error

the replica can't download them. So its an error, but something the system can recover from, since it will re-recover, which should pick up a (larger) segment next time, which is less likely to be removed whilst recovery is going on. On 3 January 2014 05:32, anand chandak wrote: Hi,

Re: Very long running replication.

Folks, would really appreciate if somebody can help/throw some light on below issue . This issue is blocking our upgrade, we are doing a 3.x to 4.x upgrade and indexing around 100g of data. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks, Anand On 1/3/2014 11:46 AM, anand chandak wrote

Re: Very long running replication.

46 PM, anand chandak wrote: Quick question about solr replication : What happens if there's a replication running for very large index that runs more than the interval for 2 replication ? would the automatic runs of replication interfere with the current running one or it would not even

Replication Error

Hi, I am hitting this error on replication, can somebody please tell me what's wrong here and what can be done to correct this error : [explicit-fetchindex-cmd] ERROR org.apache.solr.handler.ReplicationHandler- SnapPull failed :org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unable to download _av3.f

Very long running replication.

Quick question about solr replication : What happens if there's a replication running for very large index that runs more than the interval for 2 replication ? would the automatic runs of replication interfere with the current running one or it would not even spawn next iteration of replication

Error -please help

Hi, I am running into below errors when running checkindex utility : /java -cp /apps/search/tomcat/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib/lucene-core-4.4.0.jar org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex .// // //NOTE: testing will be more thorough if you run java with '-ea:org.apache.lucene...', so assertions ar