ml-node+s472066n4207029...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Indeed: https://github.com/dsmiley/SOLR-2155
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:59 PM alexw <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4207029&i=0>> wrote:
>
> > Thanks David. Unfortunately
Thanks David. Unfortunately we are on Solr 3.5, so I am not sure whether RPT
is available. If not, is there a way to patch 3.5 to make it work?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Price-Range-Faceting-Based-on-Date-Constraints-tp4206817p4207003.html
Sent from the
Thanks Holger and Alessandro, SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType is a new
concept to me, and I need some time to dig into it and see how it can help
solve my problem.
Alex Wang
Technical Architect
Crossview, Inc.
C: (647) 409-3066
aw...@crossview.com
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Holger Rie
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the link to the presentation. I am going through the slides and
trying to figure out the time-sensitive search it talks about and how it
relates to the problem I am facing. It looks like it tries to solve the
problem of sku availability based on date, while in my case, all skus
Thanks Alessandro. I am implementing this in the Hybris framework. It is not
easy to create nested documents during indexing using the Hybris Solr
indexer. So I am trying to avoid additional documents and cores if at all
possible.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
Hi,
I have an unique requirement to facet on product prices based on date
constraints, for which I have been thinking for a solution for a couple of
days now, but to no avail. The details are as follows:
1. Each product can have multiple prices, each price has a start-date and an
end-date.
2. At
Thanks Hoss and iorixxx.
Yes I probably did oversimplify the use case, which is fairly complicated to
explain. I think I might have found a workaround for the issue and I am
testing the performance of it.
Thanks again for your help!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.na
Thanks but, unfortunately that will not solve the problem since it will bring
back both the first and second doc. Besides, the query terms is: a b y z,
not just: a b
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-simple-query-tp3395465p3396297.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi all,
This may seem to be an easy one but I have been struggling to get it
working. To simplify things, let's say I have a field that can contain any
combination of the 26 alphabetic letters, space delimited:
a b
b c
x y z
The search term is a list of user specified letters,
Thanks Otis and Luke.
Yes it does make sense to spellcheck phrases in Chinese. Looks like the
default Solr spellCheck component is already doing some kind of NGram-ing.
When examining the spellCheck index, I did see gram1, gram2, gram3, gram4...
The problem is no Chinese terms were indexed into th
Hi,
I have been trying to get spellcheck to work in the Chinese language. So far
I have not had any luck. Can someone shed some light here as a general guide
line in terms of what need to happen?
I am using the CJKAnalyzer in the text field type and searching works fine,
but spelling does not wor
Sorry wrong link to the thread, here is the correct one:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-during-indexing-and-searching-td2795914.html
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-during-indexing-and-searching-tp2795914p2797158.html
I am using Nabble to view the thread, and the format seems to be ok:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=reply&node=2796849
1> what version of Solr.
Solr 1.4
2> have you looked in your index (admin page and/or luke) to see if what you
have indexed there is what you
Thanks Erick. Here is the Solr response with debug on. The productName IS in
the qf parameter in dismax. I have also pasted my dismax definition and the
"text" field type definition:
−
0
47
−
on
on
0
bit/star
dismax
10
2.2
−
−
bit/star
bit/star
bit/star
−
+DisjunctionMaxQuery((longDesc:
Hi,
I have a field named "productName" in my schema which uses the standard
"text" field type. And one of my product name is "star/bit". When I search
for "star/bit" (without quotes) using the dismax request hander, NO results
was found.
After some research, looks like during indexing, "star/bit"
Thanks Koji for the quick response. After making the changes you recommended,
it works great now.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CJKAnalyzer-and-Synonyms-tp2510104p2512097.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi everyone,
I am trying to get Synonyms working with CJKAnalyzer. Search works fine but
synonyms do not work as expected. Here is my field definition in the schema
file:
When testing on the analysis page, the synonym filter does not kick in at
all.
My que
17 matches
Mail list logo