Re: Price Range Faceting Based on Date Constraints

2015-05-22 Thread alexw
ml-node+s472066n4207029...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > Indeed: https://github.com/dsmiley/SOLR-2155 > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:59 PM alexw <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4207029&i=0>> wrote: > > > Thanks David. Unfortunately

Re: Price Range Faceting Based on Date Constraints

2015-05-21 Thread alexw
Thanks David. Unfortunately we are on Solr 3.5, so I am not sure whether RPT is available. If not, is there a way to patch 3.5 to make it work? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Price-Range-Faceting-Based-on-Date-Constraints-tp4206817p4207003.html Sent from the

Re: Price Range Faceting Based on Date Constraints

2015-05-21 Thread alexw
Thanks Holger and Alessandro, SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType is a new concept to me, and I need some time to dig into it and see how it can help solve my problem. Alex Wang Technical Architect Crossview, Inc. C: (647) 409-3066 aw...@crossview.com On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Holger Rie

Re: Price Range Faceting Based on Date Constraints

2015-05-21 Thread alexw
Hi Alex, Thanks for the link to the presentation. I am going through the slides and trying to figure out the time-sensitive search it talks about and how it relates to the problem I am facing. It looks like it tries to solve the problem of sku availability based on date, while in my case, all skus

Re: Price Range Faceting Based on Date Constraints

2015-05-21 Thread alexw
Thanks Alessandro. I am implementing this in the Hybris framework. It is not easy to create nested documents during indexing using the Hybris Solr indexer. So I am trying to avoid additional documents and cores if at all possible. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.

Price Range Faceting Based on Date Constraints

2015-05-21 Thread alexw
Hi, I have an unique requirement to facet on product prices based on date constraints, for which I have been thinking for a solution for a couple of days now, but to no avail. The details are as follows: 1. Each product can have multiple prices, each price has a start-date and an end-date. 2. At

Re: A simple query?

2011-10-12 Thread alexw
Thanks Hoss and iorixxx. Yes I probably did oversimplify the use case, which is fairly complicated to explain. I think I might have found a workaround for the issue and I am testing the performance of it. Thanks again for your help! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.na

Re: A simple query?

2011-10-05 Thread alexw
Thanks but, unfortunately that will not solve the problem since it will bring back both the first and second doc. Besides, the query terms is: a b y z, not just: a b -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-simple-query-tp3395465p3396297.html Sent from the Solr - User

A simple query?

2011-10-04 Thread alexw
Hi all, This may seem to be an easy one but I have been struggling to get it working. To simplify things, let's say I have a field that can contain any combination of the 26 alphabetic letters, space delimited: a b b c x y z The search term is a list of user specified letters,

Re: Spellchecking in the Chinese Lanugage

2011-04-12 Thread alexw
Thanks Otis and Luke. Yes it does make sense to spellcheck phrases in Chinese. Looks like the default Solr spellCheck component is already doing some kind of NGram-ing. When examining the spellCheck index, I did see gram1, gram2, gram3, gram4... The problem is no Chinese terms were indexed into th

Spellchecking in the Chinese Lanugage

2011-04-12 Thread alexw
Hi, I have been trying to get spellcheck to work in the Chinese language. So far I have not had any luck. Can someone shed some light here as a general guide line in terms of what need to happen? I am using the CJKAnalyzer in the text field type and searching works fine, but spelling does not wor

Re: Special characters during indexing and searching

2011-04-08 Thread alexw
Sorry wrong link to the thread, here is the correct one: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-during-indexing-and-searching-td2795914.html -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-during-indexing-and-searching-tp2795914p2797158.html

Re: Special characters during indexing and searching

2011-04-08 Thread alexw
I am using Nabble to view the thread, and the format seems to be ok: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=reply&node=2796849 1> what version of Solr. Solr 1.4 2> have you looked in your index (admin page and/or luke) to see if what you have indexed there is what you

Re: Special characters during indexing and searching

2011-04-08 Thread alexw
Thanks Erick. Here is the Solr response with debug on. The productName IS in the qf parameter in dismax. I have also pasted my dismax definition and the "text" field type definition: − 0 47 − on on 0 bit/star dismax 10 2.2 − − bit/star bit/star bit/star − +DisjunctionMaxQuery((longDesc:

Special characters during indexing and searching

2011-04-08 Thread alexw
Hi, I have a field named "productName" in my schema which uses the standard "text" field type. And one of my product name is "star/bit". When I search for "star/bit" (without quotes) using the dismax request hander, NO results was found. After some research, looks like during indexing, "star/bit"

Re: CJKAnalyzer and Synonyms

2011-02-16 Thread alexw
Thanks Koji for the quick response. After making the changes you recommended, it works great now. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CJKAnalyzer-and-Synonyms-tp2510104p2512097.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

CJKAnalyzer and Synonyms

2011-02-16 Thread alexw
Hi everyone, I am trying to get Synonyms working with CJKAnalyzer. Search works fine but synonyms do not work as expected. Here is my field definition in the schema file: When testing on the analysis page, the synonym filter does not kick in at all. My que