Hello
my date query returns mismatch with and without sort parameter. The query
parameter is on date field, on which records are inserted few hours ago.
sort parameter is different from query parameter, which is the expected the
count.
Any clues if how it could be different?
I am planning to do a
act and the disk will shrink back to only what it
>> needs. saved me a lot of headaches not needing to ever worry about disk
>> space
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:43 PM Raveendra Yerraguntla
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> when optimize command i
when optimize command is issued, the expectation after the completion of
optimization process is that the index size either decreases or at most remain
same. In solr 7.6 cluster with 50 plus shards, when optimize command is issued,
some of the shard's transient or older segment files are not de
tributing the leader role unless and until you can prove
that having unbalanced leaders is really having a performance impact. In my
experience, 95% of the time people spend time trying to manage which nodes are
leaders the effort is wasted.
Best,
Erick
> On Apr 20, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Raveendr
All,
We are upgrading from solr 5.4 to solr 7.6. In 5.4 each solr process based on
the core.properties (shard value assigned) will be joining as either leader or
replica based on the sequence of start.
By following the same procedure in 7.6 the initial leader node solr process is
replaced with l
them as true, the score value is returned when the
expand.sort is done on any other field.
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019, 11:09:21 AM EDT, Raveendra Yerraguntla
wrote:
All,
I am using the collapse plugin with the following query params
text_field:( apple OR apples) ) )
Fq : {!collapse
All,
I am using the collapse plugin with the following query params
text_field:( apple OR apples) ) )
Fq : {!collapse field=string_field sort='numeric_field asc , score desc '
nullPolicy=expand}
Raw params : expand=true&expand.rows=600&expand.sort=numeric_field asc
The above query result
stein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:21 AM Raveendra Yerraguntla
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> In 6.4 (Solr-9717) SortingResponseWriter is renamed to ExportWriter and
> moved to a different package.
>
> For migrating to higher Solr (post 6.4) versions, I need to help with
Hello All,
In 6.4 (Solr-9717) SortingResponseWriter is renamed to ExportWriter and moved
to a different package.
For migrating to higher Solr (post 6.4) versions, I need to help with
compatible functionalities.
Application is using SortingResponseWriter in the searcher handlers inform
method
about some of this, and provides a way to help force a one-pass even if you
> need other fields.
>
>
>> On 6/15/16, 7:31 AM, "Raveendra Yerraguntla"
>> wrote:
>>
>> I need help in understanding a query in solr cloud.
>> When user issues a query
I need help in understanding a query in solr cloud.
When user issues a query , there are are two phases of query - one with the
purpose(from debug info) of GET_TOP_FIELDS and another with GET_FIELDS.
This is having an effect on end to end performance of the application.
- what triggers (any compo
Thanks Shawn.
I got both the replies. Most likely we might have used some of the NFS
options. I will try them early next week.
Thanks
Ravi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/23/2016 6:00 AM, Raveendra Yerraguntla wrote:
> > I am using Solr 5.4 in solr cloud
All,
I am using Solr 5.4 in solr cloud mode in a 8 node cluster. Used the
replication factor of 1 for creating the index, then switched to
replication factor > 1 for redundancy. With replication factor > 1, and
tried to do indexing for incremental. When the incremental indexing
happens - getting
I just started using terms/autosuggest service.Application need the document
details along with result items. What params I need to use to fetch the
document details.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/autosuggest---terms-componet---document-details-tp25476823p25476823.html
Hi,
I am trying to use autoSuggest in Solr 1.4. Is autoSugest service available
by default like select? or should I configure anything?
Solrconfig.xml contains the termcomponent defined.
Thanks
R
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-1.4---autoSuggestis-it-a-defau
in the stack trace here.
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Yerraguntla wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using solr admin page with index.jsp from
>>
>> < <%-- $Id: index.jsp 686780 2008-08-18 15:08:28Z yonik $ --%>
>>
Hi,
I am using solr admin page with index.jsp from
< <%-- $Id: index.jsp 686780 2008-08-18 15:08:28Z yonik $ --%>
I am getting these errors. Any insight will be helpful.
HTTP Status 500 - javax.servlet.ServletException:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: config org.apache.jasper.JasperException:
java
which is a text field.
After I populate the text field, I get only the results I am expecting.
Thanks for the pointer Jorge !
Yerraguntla wrote:
>
> Hmm,
>
> I dont have any defined in the schema.xml.
> Can you give the exact syntax how it looks like in schema.xml
>
>
:
>
> Your query
>
> AnimalName:German Shepard.
>
> means
>
> AnimalName:German :Shepard.
>
> whichever the defaultField is
>
> Try with
> AnimalName:"German Shepard"
>
> or
>
> AnimalName:German AND AnimalName:Shepard.
>
>
&
Hi,
I have a data set with the following schema.
PersonName:Text
AnimalName:Text
PlantName:Text
< lot more attributes about each of them like nick name, animal nick
name, plant generic name etc which are multually exclusive>
UniqueId:long
For each of the document data set, there will be on
Hi,
I have incoming field stored both as Text and String field in solr indexed
data. When I search the following cases, string field returns documents(from
Solr client) and not text fields.
NAME:T - no results
Name_Str:T - returns documents
Similarly for the following cases - CPN*, DPS*, S, I
data set(number of documents) is not large - 100k. Number of fields could max
to 10 . With average size of indexed field could be 200 characters.
I tried creating using multiple indexes by using copy field.
Let me see how the performance will be with EdgeNGramTokenFilter or
EdgeNGramTokenizer
T
Hi,
I have the following use case. I could implement the solution but
performance is affected. I need some smart ways of doing this.
Use Case :
Incoming data has two fields which have values like 'WAL MART STORES INC'
and 'wal-mart-stores-inc'.
Users can search the data either in 'walmart' '
Hi,
I have the following use case. I could implement the solution but
performance is affected. I need some smart ways of doing this.
Use Case :
Incoming data has two fields which have values like 'WAL MART STORES INC'
and 'wal-mart-stores-inc'.
Users can search the data either in 'walmart'
Hi,
I have to search on Company Names, which contain multiple words. Some of
the examples are
Micro Image Systems, Microsoft Corp, Sun Microsystems, Advanced Micro
systems.
For the above example when the search is for micro, the expected results
order is
Micro Image Systems
Advanced Micro sy
Nm,
the fileds need to be defined as part of copyfield section just like in
the example.
silly me :(
Yerraguntla wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Basic question :)
>
> I have added new xml data after changing the example's schema.xml. When
> I am using admin qquery page. T
Hi,
Basic question :)
I have added new xml data after changing the example's schema.xml. When I
am using admin qquery page. The example works given the value of "video".
But for my data the field is looking for fieldname:value to return the
results. What should I do if i want to just search
27 matches
Mail list logo