32bit since
long time with many different things on it... That will be a big work).
Best regards,
Y. Alméras
Le 8 mai 2019 21:24:19 GMT+02:00, Shawn Heisey a écrit :
>On 5/8/2019 10:47 AM, Alméras Yannick wrote:
>> The problem of segments merging seems to be solved when I replace
>
;je
croise les doigts" ;-) ).
Best regards,
Y. Alméras
Le mardi 7 mai 2019, 15:25:13 CEST Shawn Heisey a écrit :
> On 5/7/2019 5:28 AM, Alméras Yannick wrote:
> > I don't understand a problem on my ubuntu 18.04 solr server (version
> > 7.6.0)...
> >
> > When mer
ot;is_nid":85},
{
"item_id":"87",
"is_nid":87}]
}}
Here are links to my configuration files if it helps...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pn19va6ss6n2gql/solrconfig.xml?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9sjo7q1zi1y1o1k/schema.xml?dl=0
Best Regards,
Y
Hello !
(sorry for my last double post... I thought there was a problem with my other
mail address).
Le mardi 7 mai 2019, 15:25:13 CEST Shawn Heisey a écrit :
> On 5/7/2019 5:28 AM, Alméras Yannick wrote:
> > I don't understand a problem on my ubuntu 18.04 solr server (ver
Hello !
I don't understand a problem on my ubuntu 18.04 solr server (version 7.6.0)...
When merge of segments is called, there is an error and then, the index is not
writable. The logs of a failed segments merging are at the end of this message
(here, I forced the merge but it's the same withou
Hello !
I don't understand a problem on my ubuntu 18.04 solr server (version 7.6.0)...
When merge of segments is called, there is an error and then, the index is not
writable. The logs of a failed segments merging are at the end of this message
(here, I forced the merge but it's the same withou
ate 0.38 (1 server condition) / 0.26 (on each of the 2
servers)
filter cache : hitrate 1 in both conditions
query result cache : hitrate 0.24 (1 server) / 0.14 (on each of the 2 servers)
Is it possible this is the issue? My batch issues ~300,000 queries,
corresponding to ~150,000 unique queries.
Will look into Varnish, thanks for the pointer.
Yannick
, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:06 +0200, Yannick wrote:
> I created a group of 2 Solr servers with a load-balancer in front
> (Haproxy). I have a batch client that sends requests (read-only)
> continuously to the load-balancer. The problem is: the performance is
>
Hello good Solr people,
I have the following surprising situation.
I created a group of 2 Solr servers with a load-balancer in front (Haproxy). I
have a batch client that sends requests (read-only) continuously to the
load-balancer. The problem is: the performance is slower with 2 servers than
