Solrcloud create collection ignores createNodeSet parameter

We have a solrcloud set up with 2 nodes, 1 zookeeper and running Solr 7.7.2 This cloud is used for development purposes. Collections are sharded across the 2 nodes. Recently we noticed that one of the main collections we use had both replicas running on the same node. Normally we don't see coll

RE: Odd Solr zkcli script behavior

Never mind I figured out my problem. -Original Message- From: Webster Homer Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 10:29 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Odd Solr zkcli script behavior I am using solr 7.7.2 solr cloud We version our collection and config set names with dates. I

Odd Solr zkcli script behavior

I am using solr 7.7.2 solr cloud We version our collection and config set names with dates. I have two collections sial-catalog-product-20200711 and sial-catalog-product-20200808. A developer uploaded a configuration file to the 20200711 version that was not checked into our source control, and

RE: How to measure search performance

I forgot to mention, the fields being used in the function query are indexed fields. They are mostly text fields that cannot have DocValues -Original Message- From: Webster Homer Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 2:07 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: How to measure search

RE: How to measure search performance

called for the docs returned in the packet, i.e. the “rows” parameter. Best, Erick > On Jul 23, 2020, at 11:49 AM, Webster Homer > wrote: > > I'm trying to determine the overhead of adding some pseudo fields to one of > our standard searches. The pseudo fields are simply

How to measure search performance

I'm trying to determine the overhead of adding some pseudo fields to one of our standard searches. The pseudo fields are simply function queries to report if certain fields matched the query or not. I had thought that I could run the search without the change and then re-run the searches with th

Grouping and Learning To Rank (SOLR-8776)

My company is very interested in using Learning To Rank in our product search. The problem we face is that our product search groups its results and that does not work with LTR. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8776 Is there any traction to getting the SOLR-8776 patch into the main bra

RE: eDismax query syntax question

Markus, Thanks, for the reference, but that doesn't answer my question. If - is a special character, it's not consistently special. In my example "3-DIMETHYL" behaves quite differently than ")-PYRIMIDINE". If I escape the closing parenthesis the following minus no longer behaves specially. The

eDismax query syntax question

Recently we found strange behavior in a query. We use eDismax as the query parser. This is the query term: 1,3-DIMETHYL-5-(3-PHENYL-ALLYLIDENE)-PYRIMIDINE-2,4,6-TRIONE It should hit one document in our index. It does not. However, if you use the Dismax query parser it does match the record. Th

RE: Why Did It Match?

separately in the timings section of debug output… Best, Erick > On May 28, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Webster Homer > wrote: > > My concern was that I thought that explain is resource heavy, and was only > used for debugging queries. > > -Original Message- > Fro

RE: Why Did It Match?

functionality is slower than Endecas? Or harder to understand/interpret? If the latter, I might recommend http://splainer.io as one solution On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:52 PM Webster Homer < webster.ho...@milliporesigma.com> wrote: > My company is working on a new website. The old/curren

Why Did It Match?

this functionality is an expensive debug option. Is there another way to get this information from a query? Webster Homer This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this

Solrcloud Garbage Collection Suspension linked across nodes?

My company has several Solrcloud environments. In our most active cloud we are seeing outages that are related to GC pauses. We have about 10 collections of which 4 get a lot of traffic. The solrcloud consists of 4 nodes with 6 processors and 11Gb heap size (25Gb physical memory). I notice that

Learning To Rank with Group Queries

Hi, My company is looking at using the Learning to Rank. However, our main searches do grouping. There is an old Jira from 2016 about how these don't work together. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8776 It doesn't look like this has moved much since then. When will we be able to re-rank

Schema Browser API

I was just looking at the Schema Browser for one of our collections. It's pretty handy. I was thinking that it would be useful to create a tool that would create a report about what fields were indexed had docValues, were multivalued etc... Has someone built such a tool? I want it to aid in est

Upgrading Solrcloud indexes from 7.2 to 8.4.1

We are looking at upgrading our Solrcoud instances from 7.2 to the most recent version of solr 8.4.1 at this time. The last time we upgraded a major solr release we were able to upgrade the index files to the newer version, this prevented us from having an outage. Subsequently we've reindexed a

RE: Solr Admin Console hangs on Chrome

t;>> How long delay do you see? Is it only for query panel or for the UI in >>> general? >>> A query for *:* is not necessarily a simple query, it depends on how many >>> and large fields you have etc. Try a query with fl=id or fl=title and see >>> if th

RE: Solr Admin Console hangs on Chrome

>>>>> What version of Solr? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:58 PM Arnold

Solr Admin Console hangs on Chrome

It seems like the Solr Admin console has become slow when you use it on the chrome browser. If I go to the query tab and execute a query, even the default *:* after that the browser window becomes very slow. I'm using chrome Version 78.0.3904.108 (Official Build) (64-bit) on Windows The work aro

RE: fq pfloat_field:* returns no documents, tfloat:* does

s, tfloat:* does Hi Webster, > The fq facet_melting_point:* "Point" numeric fields don't support that syntax currently, and the way to retrieve "docs with any value in field foo" is "foo:[* TO *]". See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11746 O

fq pfloat_field:* returns no documents, tfloat:* does

The fq facet_melting_point:* Returns 0 rows. However the field clearly has data in it, why does this query return rows where there is data I am trying to update our solr schemas to use the point fields instead of the trie fields. We have a number of pfloat fields. These fields are indexed and

Filtering point fields filters everything.

ldn't get values for index_date either even though every record has it set with the default of NOW So what am I doing wrong with the point fields? I expected to be able to do just about everything with the point fields I could do with the deprecated trie fields. Regards, Webster H

RE: tlogs are not deleted

Tlogs will accumulate if you have buffers "enabled". Make sure that you explicitly disable buffering from the cdcr endpoint https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_7/cdcr-api.html#disablebuffer Make sure that they're disabled on both the source and targets I believe that sometimes buffers get enab

RE: json.facet throws ClassCastException

- From: Mikhail Khludnev Sent: Friday, October 04, 2019 2:28 PM To: solr-user Subject: Re: json.facet throws ClassCastException Hello, Webster. Have you managed to capture stacktrace? On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 8:24 PM Webster Homer < webster.ho...@milliporesigma.com> wrote: > I'm t

json.facet throws ClassCastException

I'm trying to understand what is wrong with my query or collection. I have a functioning solr schema and collection. I'm running Solr 7.2 When I run with a facet.field it works, but if I change it to use a json.facet it throws a class cast exception. json.facet=prod:{type:terms,field:product,mi

RE: Strange regex behavior in solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory

the text (line breaks, tabs > etc.). > >> Am 27.09.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Webster Homer >> : >> >> I forgot to mention that I'm using Solr 7.2. I also found that if >> instead of \p{L} I use the long form \p{Letter} then when I reload >> the collection a

RE: Strange regex behavior in solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory

al Message----- From: Webster Homer Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 9:09 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Strange regex behavior in solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory I am developing a new version of a fieldtype that we’ve been using for several years. This fieldtype is to be used as a

Strange regex behavior in solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory

I am developing a new version of a fieldtype that we’ve been using for several years. This fieldtype is to be used as a part of an autocomplete code. The original version handled standard ascii characters well, but I wanted it to be able to handle any Unicode letter, not just A-Za-z but Greek an

RE: CDCR tlog corruption leads to infinite loop

-Original Message- From: Webster Homer Sent: Monday, September 09, 2019 4:17 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: CDCR tlog corruption leads to infinite loop We are running Solr 7.2.0 Our configuration has several collections that are loaded into a solr cloud which is set to replicate

CDCR tlog corruption leads to infinite loop

We are running Solr 7.2.0 Our configuration has several collections that are loaded into a solr cloud which is set to replicate using CDCR to 3 different solrclouds. All of our target collections have 2 shards with two replicas per shard. Our source collection has 2 shards, and 1 replica per sh

RE: boost parameter produces garbage hits

unexpected with 0 relevancy. It does appear that bq does what I want, but the behavior of boost seems like a bug. We use boost elsewhere and it works as we want, that use case does not involve using the query function though. -Original Message- From: Webster Homer Sent: Thursday, April

boost parameter produces garbage hits

Hi, I am trying to understand how the boost (and bq) parameters are supposed to work. My application searches our product schema and returns the best matches. To enable an exactish match on product name we created fields that are minimally tokenized (keyword tokenizer/lowercase). Now I want the

CloudSolrClient Question

I am using the CloudSolrClient Solrj api for querying solr cloud collections. For the most part it works well. However we recently experienced a series of outages where our production cloud became unavailable. All the nodes were down. That's a separate topic... The client application tried to la

Help needed with Solrcloud error messages

We have a number of collections in a Solrcloud. The cloud has 2 shards each with 2 replicas, 4 nodes. On one of the nodes I am seeing a lot of errors in the log like this: 2019-02-04 20:27:11.831 ERROR (qtp1595212853-88527) [c:sial-catalog-product s:shard1 r:core_node4 x:sial-catalog-product_sha

RE: Query kills Solrcloud

need to narrow the focus to a smaller number of records, and I'm not certain how to do that efficiently. Are there debug parameters that could help? -Original Message- From: Webster Homer Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 3:45 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Query

Query kills Solrcloud

We are experiencing almost nightly solr crashes due to Japanese queries. I’ve been able to determine that one of our field types seems to be a culprit. When I run a much reduced version of the query against out DEV solrcloud I see the memory usage jump from less than a gb to 5gb using only a sin

Help CJK OOM Errors

Recently we had a few Japanese queries that killed our production Solrcloud instance. Our schemas support multiple languages, with language specific search fields. This query and similar ones caused OOM errors in Solr: モノクローナル抗ニコチン性アセチルコリンレセプター(??7サブユニット)抗体 マウス宿主抗体 The query doesn’t match anyth

Query kills Solr

Is there a way to get an approximate measure of the memory used by an indexed field(s). I’m looking into a problem with one of our Solr indexes. I have a Japanese query that causes the replicas to run out of memory when processing a query. Also, is there a way to change or disable the timeout in

CDCR Replication sensitive to network problems

We are using Solr 7.2. We have two solrclouds that are hosted on Google clouds. These are targets for an on Prem solr cloud where we run our ETL loads and have CDCR replicate it to the Google clouds. This mostly works pretty well. However, networks can fail. When the network has a brief outage

Solr on Java 11?

My company is planning on upgrading our stack to use Java 11. What version of Solr is planned to be supported on Java 11? We won't be doing this immediately as several of our key components are not yet been ported to 11, but we want to plan for it. Thanks, Webster

RE: Negative CDCR Queue Size?

k Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 12:36 PM To: solr-user Subject: Re: Negative CDCR Queue Size? What version of Solr? CDCR has changed quite a bit in the 7x code line so it's important to know the version. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:32 AM Webster Homer wrote: &g

Negative CDCR Queue Size?

Several times I have noticed that the CDCR action=QUEUES will return a negative queueSize. When this happens we seem to be missing data in the target collection. How can this happen? What does a negative Queue size mean? The timestamp is an empty string. We have two targets for a source. One lo

RE: Odd Scoring behavior

The KeywordRepeat and RemoveDuplicates were added to support better wildcard matching. Removing the duplicates just removes those terms that weren't stemmed. This seems like a subtle bug to me -Original Message- From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openindex.io] Sent: Tuesday, Oc

Odd Scoring behavior

I noticed that sometimes query matches seem to get counted twice when they are scored. This will happen if the fieldtype is being stemmed, and there is a matching synonym. It seems that the score for the field is 2X higher than it should be. We see this only when there is a matching synonym that

Solr admin timeout

I have a fairly complex query which I'm trying to debug. The query works as long as I don't try to return the field: [explain style=nl] Of course this is the data I'm really interested in. When I run it, the console acts busy, but then the screen clears displaying no data. I suspect a timeout in

numdocs is different on replicas in a shard

This morning I was told that there was something screwy with one of our collections. This collection has 2 shards and 2 replicas per shard. Each replica has a different value for numDocs! Datacenter #1 shard1_replica11513053 shard1_replica21512653 shard2_replica11512296 shard2_replica2

Re: list of collections

use the Solrcloud Collections API https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/collections-api.html#list On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Kudrettin Güleryüz wrote: > Hi, > > What is the suggested way to get list of collections from a solr Cloud with > a ZKhost? > > Thank you > -- This message a

Retrieving json.facet from a search

I have a fairly large existing code base for querying Solr. It is architected where common code calls solr and returns a solrj QueryResponse object. I'm currently using Solr 7.2 the code interacts with solr using the Solrj client api I have a need that would be very easily met by using the json.f

CDCR sensitive to network failures

Recently I encountered some problems with CDCR after we experienced network problems, I thought I'd share. I'm using Solr 7.2.0 We have 3 solr cloud instances where we update one cloud and use cdcr to forward updates to the two solrclouds that are hosted in a cloud. Usually this works pretty well

Re: the number of docs in each group depends on rows

We do group queries with Solrcloud all the time. You must set up your collection so that all values for the field you are grouping on are in the same shard. This can easily be done with the composite router. Basically you do this be creating a unique field that contains the field to group on, with

CDCR broken for Mixed Replica Collections

I was looking at SOLR-12057 According to the comment on the ticket, CDCR can not work when a collection has PULL Replicas. That seems like a MAJOR limitation to CDCR and PULL Replicas. Is this likely to be addressed in the future? CDCR currently is broken for TLOG replicas too. https://issues.apa

Re: Collection out of disk space, commit problem

added to CDCR. > > But I don't recall your other e-mails mention CDCR so I mention this > on the off chance... > > Best, > Erick > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Webster Homer > wrote: > > Over the weekend one of our Dev solrcloud ran out of dis

Collection out of disk space, commit problem

Over the weekend one of our Dev solrcloud ran out of disk space. Examining the problem we found one collection that had 2 months of uncommitted tlog files. Unfortuneatly the solr logs rolled over and so I cannot see the commit behavior during the last time data was loaded to it. The solrconfig.xml

Re: Solr 7.2 cannot see all running nodes

This Zookeeper ensemble doesn't look right. > > ./bin/solr start -cloud -s /usr/local/bin/solr-7.2.1/server/solr/node1/ -p > 8983 -z zk0-esohad,zk1-esohad,zk3-esohad:2181 -m 8g Shouldn't the zookeeper ensemble be specified as: zk0-esohad:2181,zk1-esohad:2181,zk3-esohad:2181 You should put the

Re: Why are cursor mark queries recommended over regular start, rows combination?

rytime. We use Solr as a search engine, we almost always want to retrieve results in order of relevancy. I think that we will phase out the use of NRT replicas in favor of TLOG replicas On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 3/23/2018 3:47 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > &g

Re: solrj question

Mar 23, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 3/23/2018 3:24 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > > I see this in the output: > > Lexical error at line 1, column 1759. Encountered: after : > > "/select?defType=edismax&start=0&rows=25&... > > It has basically

Re: Why are cursor mark queries recommended over regular start, rows combination?

Just FYI I had a project recently where I tried to use cursorMark in Solrcloud and solr 7.2.0 and it was very unreliable. It couldn't even return consistent numberFound values. I posted about it in this forum. Using the start and rows arguments in SolrQuery did work reliably so I abandoned cursorMa

solrj question

I am working on a program to play back queries from a log file. It seemed straight forward. The log has the solr query written to it. via the SolrQuery.toString method. The SolrQuery class has a constructor which takes a string. It does instantiate a SolrQuery object, however when I try to actuall

Re: solrcloud Auto-commit doesn't seem reliable

t; Commits worked fine after that. I don't know what caused the commits to > > stop, and why re-booting (and not just restarting Solr) caused them to > work > > fine. > > > > Wondering if you ever found a solution to your situation? > > > > > >

Re: Solr SynonymGraphFilterFactory error on import

You probably want to call solr.FlattenGraphFilterFactory after the call to WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory. I put it at the end Also there is an issue calling more than one graph filter in an analysis chain so you may need to remove one of them. I think that there is a Jira about that Personal

Re: Solr 7.2.0 CDCR Issue with TLOG collections

seems that this is a bug in Solr https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12057 Hopefully it can be addressed soon! On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > I noticed that the cdcr action=queues returns different results for the > target clouds. One target says th

Re: Solr 7.2.0 CDCR Issue with TLOG collections

m:2181/solr", [ "b2b-catalog-material-180124T", [ "queueSize", 0, "lastTimestamp", "2018-02-28T18:34:39.704Z" ] ], "yyy-mzk01.sial.com:2181,yyy-mzk02.sial.com:2181, yyy-mzk03.sial.com:2181/solr", [ "b2b-catalog-material-180124T", [ "qu

Re: Solr 7.2.0 CDCR Issue with TLOG collections

=COLLECTIONCHECKPOINT, and action=SHARDCHECKPOINT no errors autoCommit is set to 6 I tried sending a commit explicitly no difference. cdcr is uploading data, but no new data appears in the collection. On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > We have been having strange behavior w

Solr 7.2.0 CDCR Issue with TLOG collections

We have been having strange behavior with CDCR on Solr 7.2.0. We have a number of replicas which have identical schemas. We found that TLOG replicas give much more consistent search results. We created a collection using TLOG replicas in our QA clouds. We have a locally hosted solrcloud with 2 no

Re: NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

t; collections do not include the "myParent1". > This makes the names of my collections more confusing because you can't > tell what application they belong to. It wasn’t a problem until we had 2 > collections for one of the apps. > > > > > -Original M

Re: NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

NRT replicas. So using TLOG replicas still looks like the best work around for the NRT issue On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 3/2/2018 9:28 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > >> I've never disabled this before. I edited the solrconfig.xml setting the >> size

Re: NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

dexed? The documentation on this feature is skimpy. Is there a way to see if it's enabled in the Admin Console? On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > Emir, > > Using tlog replica types addresses my immediate problem. > > The secondary issue is that all of our sear

Re: 7.2.1 ExactStatsCache seems no longer functioning

Your problem seems a lot like an issue I see with Near Real Time (NRT) replicas. I posted about it in this forum. I was told that a possible solution was to use the Global Stats feature. I am looking at testing that now. Have you tried using Tlog replicas? That fixed my issues with relevancy diffe

Re: NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

; Emir > -- > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > > > > > On 26 Feb 2018, at 21:03, Webster Homer wrote: > > > > Erick, > > > > No we didn't loo

Re: NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

st, > Erick > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Webster Homer > wrote: > > Thanks Shawn, I had settled on this as a solution. > > > > All our use cases for Solr is to return results in order of relevancy to > > the query, so having a deterministic sort would

Re: NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

20 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 2/26/2018 10:26 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > > We need the results by relevancy so the application sorts the results by > > score desc, and the unique id ascending as the tie breaker > > This is the reason for the discrepancy, and why the different

NRT replicas miss hits and return duplicate hits when paging solrcloud searches

I have an application which implements several different searches against a solrcloud collection. We are using Solr 7.2 and Solr 6.1 The collection b2b-catalog-material is created with the default Near Real Time (NRT) replicas. The collection has 2 shards each with 2 replicas. The application lau

Re: solrcloud Auto-commit doesn't seem reliable

1. When you say you "issue a commit" I'm > assuming > it's via collection/update?commit=true or some such which issues a > hard > commit with openSearcher=true. And it's on a _collection_ basis, right? > > Sorry I can't be more help > Erick > &g

Collections Fail to load after Solr Restart

Yesterday I restarted a development solrcloud. After the cloud restarted 2 collections failed to come back. I see this in the log: 2018-02-16 15:31:16.684 ERROR (coreLoadExecutor-6-thread-1-processing-n:ae1c-ecomdev-msc02:8983_solr) [ ] o.a.s.c.CachingDirectoryFactory Error closing directory:org.

Null Pointer exception after upgrading lucene index from 6.1 to 7.2

We ran the org.apache.lucene.index.IndexUpgrader as part of upgrading from 6.1 to 7.2.0 After the upgrade, one of our collections threw a NullPointerException on a query of *:* We didn't observe errors in the logs. All of our other collections appear to be fine. Re-indexing the collection seems

Re: solrcloud Auto-commit doesn't seem reliable

mit We had a lot of issues with missing commits when we didn't set solr.autoCommit.maxTime ${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:6} false ${solr.autoSoftCommit.maxTime:5000} On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 2/9/2018 9:2

Re: solrcloud Auto-commit doesn't seem reliable

appen. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > I we do have autoSoftcommit set to 3 seconds. It is NOT the visibility of > the records that is my primary concern. I am concerned about is the > accumulation of uncommitted tlog files and the larger number of deleted > do

Re: solrcloud Auto-commit doesn't seem reliable

, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 2/9/2018 8:44 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > >> I look at the latest timestamp on a record in the collection and see that >> it is over 24 hours old. >> >> I send a commit to the collection, and then see that the core is now &g

solrcloud Auto-commit doesn't seem reliable

I have observed this behavior with several versions of solr (4.10, 6.1, and now 7.2) I look in the admin console and look at a core and see that it is not "current" I also notice that there are lots of segments etc... I look at the latest timestamp on a record in the collection and see that it is

Re: SynonymGraphFilterFactory with WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory usage

I noticed that in some of the current example schemas that are shipped with Solr, there is a fieldtype, text_en_splitting, that feeds the output of SynonymGraphFilterFactory into WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory. So if this isn't supported, the example should probably be updated or removed. On Mon,

Re: cdcr replication of new collection doesn't replicate

the delete. Otherwise it doesn't seem to work very well. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > We have just upgraded our QA solr clouds to 7.2.0 > We have 3 solr clouds. collections in the first cloud replicate to the > other 2 > > For existing collections

cdcr replication of new collection doesn't replicate

We have just upgraded our QA solr clouds to 7.2.0 We have 3 solr clouds. collections in the first cloud replicate to the other 2 For existing collections which we upgraded in place using the lucene index upgrade tool seem to behave correctly data written to collections in the first environment rep

What are solr index.properties files

While upgrading our QA solr 6.1 solrclouds to Solr 7.2.0 I discovered that some of our index folders for a replica had directory names like index.20170830071504690 These replicas also had a file index.properties which indicates which index directory is current. We don't see this configuration in

Re: Strange Alias behavior

I don't like that this behavior is not documented. It appears from this that aliases are recursive (sort of) and that isn't documented. On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:38 AM, alessandro.benedetti wrote: > b2b-catalog-material-etl -> b2b-catalog-material > b2b-catalog-material -> b2b-catalog-material-1

Re: Strange Alias behavior

to use the alias > when they were all re-written, then delete old_collection. > > So it is convenient I think. We haven't moved forward on SOLR-11488 > yet. SOLR-11218 beefed up some testing also so we don't inadvertently > break things. > > Best, > Erick > > >

Re: Strange Alias behavior

It seems like a useful feature, especially for migrating from standalone to solrcloud, at least if the precedence of alias to collection is defined and enforced. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 1/19/2018 3:53 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > >> I created the a

Re: Strange Alias behavior

ng2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why would you create an alias with an existing collection name? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 19, 2018, at 14:14, Webster Homer wrote: > > > > I just discovered some odd behavior with aliases. > > > > We are in the process of

Re: Preserve order during indexing

db order isn't generally defined, unless you are using an explicit "order by" on your select. Default behavior would vary by database type and even release of the database. You can index the fields that you would "order by" in the db, and sort on those fields in solr On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:17

Strange Alias behavior

I just discovered some odd behavior with aliases. We are in the process of converting over to use aliases in solrcloud. We have a number of collections that applications have referenced the collections from when we used standalone solr. So we created alias names to match the name that the java app

Re: cursorMark and Solrcloud

o get this working and I found that using the normal start/rows iteration seems to work. if less efficiently On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > sorry solr_returned is the total count of the documents retrieved from the > queryResponse. So if I ask for 200 rows at at time

Re: cursorMark and Solrcloud

PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 1/15/2018 12:52 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > >> When I don't have score in the sort, the solr_returned and count are the >> same >> > > I don't know what "solr_returned" means. I haven't encountered that > befo

Re: cursorMark and Solrcloud

When I don't have score in the sort, the solr_returned and count are the same On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > The problem is that the cursor mark query returns different numbers of > documents each time it is called when the collection has multiple replicas

Re: cursorMark and Solrcloud

nt result sets. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 1/15/2018 11:56 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > >> I have noticed strange behavior using cursorMark for deep paging in an >> application. We use solrcloud for searching. We have several clouds for >>

cursorMark and Solrcloud

I have noticed strange behavior using cursorMark for deep paging in an application. We use solrcloud for searching. We have several clouds for development. For our development systems we have two different clouds. One cloud has 2 shards with 1 replica per shard. All or our other clouds are set up w

Re: CDCR configuration in solrconfig

We also have the same configurations used in different environments. We upload the configset to zookeeper and use the Config API to overlay environment specific settings in the solrconfig.xml. We have avoided having collections share the same configsets, basically for this reason. If CDCR supporte

Re: Deep Paging with cursorMark throws error

As I suspected this was a bug in my code. We use KIE Drools to configure our queries, and there was a conflict between two rules. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > I am developing an application that uses cursorMark deep paging. It's a > java client using s

Deep Paging with cursorMark throws error

I am developing an application that uses cursorMark deep paging. It's a java client using solrj client. Currently the client is created with Solr 6.2 solrj jars, but the test server is a solr 7.1 server I am getting this error: Error from server at http://XX:8983/solr/sial-catalog-product: Cu

Re: Solr 7 and int, long, float field types

Oh sorry missed that they were defined as trie fields. For some reason I thought that they were Java classes On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Webster Homer wrote: > I am converting a schema from 6 to 7 and in the process I removed the Trie > field types and replaced them with Point field

Solr 7 and int, long, float field types

I am converting a schema from 6 to 7 and in the process I removed the Trie field types and replaced them with Point field types. My schema also had fields defined as "int" and "long". These seem to have been removed as well, but I don't remember seeing that documented. In my original schema the _

Re: Admin Console Question

hese twice. We were migrating from solr 6.2.0 if that makes any difference On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 11/15/2017 8:40 AM, Webster Homer wrote: > > I do see errors in both Consoles. I see more errors on the ones that > don't > > display Arg

  1   2   3   >