ssingFirst/Last to determine where docs with
> missing fields appear in the results.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Vijay Tiwary
> wrote:
> > Hello Eric,
> >
> > title is a string field
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, 9:21
t?
>
> There's usually something like alphaOnlySort. People often copyField
> from "title" to "title_sort" and search on "title" and sort on
> title_sort.
>
> alphaOnlySort uses KeywordTokenizer and LowercaseFilterFactory.
>
> Best,
> Erick
Hello Team,
I have multiple collection on solr (5.4.1) cloud based on year
content2107
content2018
Also I have a collection "content" which does not have any data.
Now if I query them as follows
http://host:port/solr/content/select?q=*:*&collection=content2107,
content2108&sort=title
asc
Where
ld.
> It is huge difference between json and flat here. Do you know the reason
> for this? Is there a way to improve it ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijay Tiwary [mailto:vijaykr.tiw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 9:58 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
Json facet on string fields run lot slower than on numeric fields. Try and
see if you can represent studentid as a numeric field.
On Apr 30, 2017 1:19 PM, "Mikhail Ibraheem"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do aggregation with JSON faceting but performance is very
> bad for one of the requests:
>
Can somebody confirm whether the jira SOLR-8096 will affect json facet
also as I see sub faceting using term facet on string field is ruuning 5x
slower than on integer field for same number of hits and unique terms.
On 17-May-2016 3:33 pm, "Vijay Tiwary" wrote:
> Below i
Hello all,
I have an index of 8 shards having 1 replica each distubuted across 8 node
solr cloud . Size of index is 300 gb having 30 million documents. Solr json
facet runs extremly slow if I am sub faceting on string field even if
tnumfound is only around 2 (also I am not returning any rows i.
Hi,
I want to subscribe to the mailing list
Regards,
Vijay
