Re: Problem with migration from solr 3.5 with SOLR-2155 usage to solr 4.0

2013-01-24 Thread Viacheslav Davidovich
ves on in Lucene/Solr 4 in the > "SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType" field type. In the example schema > it's registered under the name "location_rpt". For more information on > how to use this field type, see: SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType > > ~ David Smiley > > On 1/2

Problem with migration from solr 3.5 with SOLR-2155 usage to solr 4.0

2013-01-23 Thread Viacheslav Davidovich
Hi, With Solr 3.5 I use SOLR-2155 plugin to filter the documents by distance as described in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#Advanced_Spatial_Search and this solution perfectly filter the multiValued data defined in schema.xml like the query looks like this with Solr 3.5: q=*

Re: Problem with migration to SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4

2012-11-29 Thread Viacheslav Davidovich
ing is needed when changing field types. > ~ David > ____ > From: Viacheslav Davidovich [via Lucene] > [ml-node+s472066n4022861...@n3.nabble.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:42 AM > To: Smiley, David W. > Subject: Re

Re: Problem with migration to SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4

2012-11-28 Thread Viacheslav Davidovich
Hi David, thank you for reply. Actually when I change the fieldType to some magic happens and old query start to work. And this change resolve my problems with distance calculation even without solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType field type usage. WBR Viacheslav. On 26.11.2012, at 18

Problem with migration to SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4

2012-11-25 Thread Viacheslav Davidovich
Hi, I apologize for the question, but I can not find out what is wrong. I try to switch from Solr 3.5 to Solr 4.0. With Solr 3.5 I use SOLR-2155 plugin to filter the documents by distance as described in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#Advanced_Spatial_Search and this solution perf