ing at this stage? Sounds like the
> original result list is where Solr responsibility ends.
>
> You are not exposing Solr directly to the UI (you should not), so
> whatever your middleware is, can be coded any way you want.
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019
keep track of the
> recommendations.
>
> Thanks
> Saurabh
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 8:16 AM Venkateswarlu Bommineni
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Team,
> >
> > Apologies , if you feel this question is silly and weird.
> >
> > Here is the scenario I am trying
Hello Team,
Apologies , if you feel this question is silly and weird.
Here is the scenario I am trying to achieve.
1) Customers come to PCAT (Product category/listing pages) [we hit Solr to
get the results]
2) Customer selects a product and goes to product details page.
3) When customer comes ba
ons automatically use terms query parser
> for large, simple or clauses. Do look into using it anyway. And I'd set
> cache=false because I doubt you'll ever get a cache hit...
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019, 16:21 Venkateswarlu Bommineni
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Team,
> >
to 4096.
Please help me here.
Thanks,
Venkat.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:46 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/30/2019 2:20 PM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
> > I have got a requirement to send many strings (~1500) in the filter query
> > param to the solr.
> >
> >
Hello Team,
I have got a requirement to send many strings (~1500) in the filter query
param to the solr.
Can you please provide any suggestions/precautions we need to take care in
this particular scenario.
Thanks,
Venkat.
Hello All,
I have a requirement to group and show the total number of results.
Example :
Solr has 10 documnets with 3 docs has rank (which is a field) 1 , 3 docs
has rank 2 and 3 has rank 3.
when i do goup=ture and group.field=rank & group.limit=3 &
group.ngroups=true
I am getting the grouped
e, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:37 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> How this all works will be much clearer if you don't use "group.main=true"
>
> But you still haven't _shown_ us what you _expect_.
>
> In the second query, Solr is doing exactly what you're telling it to.
>
"rank":1272},
{
"price":65.0,
"rank":1272},
{
"price":60.0,
"rank":2356},
{
"price":60.0,
"rank":2356},
{
"price":60.0,
"r
te example of documents and the return you
> expect we could understand your use-case better.
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:03 PM Venkateswarlu Bommineni
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the reply Shawn.
> >
> > I have tried multiple combination of
?
Thanks,
Venakt.
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 8:40 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/8/2018 8:34 PM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
> > Query ;
> > https://
> /solr/default/select?fq=rank_int:[1%20TO%20*]&indent=on&wt=json&group=true&group.main=true&group.fiel
Hello Solr Experts,
I am facing an weird issue. where if i have put group.limit>1 then sorting
is not working as expected.
Query ;
https:///solr/default/select?fq=rank_int:[1%20TO%20*]&indent=on&wt=json&group=true&group.main=true&group.field=
rank_int&group.limit=3&q=*&fl=code_string,sapRank_int,
JIRA before using it.
>
> Amrit Sarkar
> Search Engineer
> Lucidworks, Inc.
> 415-589-9269
> www.lucidworks.com
> Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2
> Medium: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2
>
> On Tue, Nov 1
Hello Guys,
I would like to understand how index time boosting works in Solr. and how
it is relates to ommitNorms property in schema.xml.
and i am trying to understand how it works internally , if you have any
documentation please provide.
Thanks,
Venkat.
Thanks for the reply Shawn.
But I am little confused on faceting on one field and return the result of
another field.
could you please give sample query. Thanks a lot in advance!!!
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/31/2017 5:15 AM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wr
of type string that will be used for faceting:
>
>
> stored="false" />
>
> HTH,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> >
Hello Team,
Please suggest how to achieve below scenario.
I have a field '*productSuggestion*' , below is the configuration.
when i use above field in facets i am getting only indexed values (lower
case values ) , but i need original value.
Example : Original String : Life is Beaut
> Have you seen Shawn's page?
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey
>
> And what does your Solr log say happens? OOM? Other? Could you throttle
> your indexing client to spare some CPU cycles for querying?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 201
Hi Team,
Background:
We have a Solr 6.2 having multiple cores ( Six cores ) in it , We have
other system (CMS) that will push the data to Solr.
Issue:
When ever we are doing full index from other system (installed in different
box) , some times Solr JVM is crashing.sometimes even don't crash th
; I know of installations indexing 100s of K documents each second.
> Actually the record I know of is over 1M docs/second. If each of those
> requests had to touch ZK to complete ZK could never keep up
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Venkateswarlu B
Hi Team,
Is there any way we can bring down ZK without impacting Solr ?
I know it might be a silly question as Solr tolly depends in ZK for all I/O
operations and configuration changes.
Thanks,
Venkat.
7:39 AM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
> > In current design we have below configuration: *One collection with
> > one shard with 4 replication factor with 4 nodes.* as of now, it is
> > working fine.but once we launch our application all across the world
> > it may give pe
Hello Guys,
In current design we have below configuration:
*One collection with one shard with 4 replication factor with 4 nodes.*
as of now, it is working fine.but once we launch our application all across
the world it may give performance issues.
To improve the performance below is our thoug
Cool..
Thanks, Shawn.
It's worked.
But I don't see replication factor is increased in Solr, It's still showing
as 2 after adding third also.
Thanks,
Venkat.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/9/2017 5:31 AM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
>
.
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/2/2017 4:24 AM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
> > We have Solr setup with below configuration.
> >
> > 1) 1 collection with one shard
> > 2) 4 Solr Nodes
> > 2) and replication factor 4 with
Hello Team,
We have Solr setup with below configuration.
1) 1 collection with one shard
2) 4 Solr Nodes
2) and replication factor 4 with one replication to each Solr Node.
as of now, it's working fine.But going forward it Size may reach high and
we would need to add new Node.
Could you guys p
Thanks for the reply.
I can see same configuration as given in mail in Solr configuration file
But I can see same performance issues while querying also through solrJ.
Thanks,
Venkat.
On 21 Apr 2017 9:30 am, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
> On 4/20/2017 9:23 PM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wr
Hi,
I am new to Solr so need your help in solving below issue.
I am using SolrJ to add and commit the files into Solr.
But Solr commit is taking a long time.
for example: for 14000 records it is taking 4 min.
below is the code snippet.
*static final HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer
28 matches
Mail list logo
