Hi Solr-Users,
I am not sure but does there exist any mechanism where-in we can specify
solr as Batch and incremental indexing.
What I mean by batch indexing is solr would delete all the records which
existed in the index and will create an new index form the given data.
For incremental I want
build a set of related entities or terms which are
following the current term, and than can decide on which all can become
part of the tagset.
It that the requirement or I am missing something here.
-- Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath N. Rao
Jon Baer wrote:
Well for example in any given text (whi
populate
a field called entities in the database, which we would ingest in Solr
as yet another field.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath N. Rao
Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Open Source NLP platforms like GATE (http://gate.ac.uk) or Apache UIMA are
typically used for these types of tasks. GATE in
Hi Solr-users,
I have one simple requirement, If I have multiple-Solr installations how
can I sync up the indexes across these machines.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath N. Rao
Hi Solr-Users,
Is there any way of merging Result section with the snippet generated
using the highlight option. So what I am essentially asking is the
following.
If I query Solr with highlight set to true it returns me back an result
+ highlight section. In the following manner,
It will re
Hi Shalin,
This works for me.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Vaijanath N. Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
We have one field called language, i.e.. language of the documents, we want
people to search for there required
Hi Chris and David,
We have one field called language, i.e.. language of the documents, we
want people to search for there required query terms but limit it to the
language selected
I think the confusion caused was with the query string
q=field1:xyz+xyz&qt=dismax.
instead the q can be of typ
Hi Solr-Users,
I am using DisMaxHandler in my application and I am facing one issue.
The DisMaxHandler works fine for general queries but returns no result
if I do fielded search.
For example
for query
a) q=xyz&qt=dismax returns me the required results
but if I do
b) q=field1:xyz+xyz&qt=dismax
Hi All,
I am using the Solr (1.3) nightly build. I need to know where should I
make the changes in either config or the way I query the Solr to achive
a) collapse the documents on a field
I reffered to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing?highlight=%28collapse%29,
but still did not ge
Hi Shalin and Erik,
DisMax works for me.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Vaijanath N. Rao wrote:
Hi Solr-users,
I have few fields in solr, for example let name them f1,f2,f3 of
which f3 is set a default field.
We have different boost for the
Hi Solr-users,
I have few fields in solr, for example let name them f1,f2,f3 of which
f3 is set a default field.
We have different boost for the different fields. What I need is if
someone types in a query let say x. I want solr to rank the documents
based on how x appeared on all the fields
ou do need to
optimize periodically for some reason, just send optimize commands to Solr from
your own application.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Vaijanath N. Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Solr-Users,
I have gone through the solrConfig.xml file in the example directory of
the solr build (nightly build). I wanted to know is there a way to tell
solr to optimize the index after certain number of seconds elapsed or
number of records indexed as we do in case of auto-commit.
--Th
Hi All,
I tried to search within the SOLR archive, but could not find the answer
of how can I create multiple index within SOLR. In case of lucene I can
create an IndexWriter with a new Index, and hence can have multiple
Index, I can allow search on that multiple index. How can I create in
So
Hi Rantjil Bould,
I would suggest you to give a thought on Trie data structure which is
used for auto-complete. Hitting Solr for every prefix looks time
consuming job, but I might be wrong. I have Trie implementation and it
works very fast (of course it is in memory data structure unlike solr
15 matches
Mail list logo