for a few years, and looking into it when it
cropped up again recently I realized it is probably an upstream problem, so
I wanted to open an issue for Lucene.
Is this a known issue, or should I create a new ticket?
Thanks!
—Trey
Trey Jones
Sr. Computational Linguist, Search Platform
Wikimedia
g" vs. "Unmanaged Clustering" Mode
Alt F: "Managed Clustering" vs. "Manual Clustering" Mode
?
I think I prefer option F.
Trey Grainger
Founder, Searchkernel
https://searchkernel.com
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 5:59 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I support Mike Dro
w terminology to clearly distinguish between modes. Regardless
of the naming decided on, I'm in support of removing the master/slave
nomenclature.
Trey Grainger
Founder, Searchkernel
https://searchkernel.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 7:00 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/17/2020 2:36 PM, Trey Grainge
Sorry:
>
> but I maintain that leader vs. follower behavior is inconsistent here.
Sorry, that should have said "I maintain that leader vs. follower behavior
is consistent here."
Trey Grainger
Founder, Searchkernel
https://searchkernel.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:03 PM Trey
is true that Standalone mode does not currently have support for
two of the replica TYPES that SolrCloud mode does, but I maintain that
leader vs. follower behavior is inconsistent here.
Trey Grainger
Founder, Searchkernel
https://searchkernel.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:41 PM Walter Underwood
w
and followers, whereas in
standalone mode you have to manage them manually (as is the case with most
things in SolrCloud vs. Standalone).
My view is that having an entirely different set of terminology describing
the same thing is way more cognitive overhead than having consistent
terminology.
Trey Grain
eady
specific and well established meaning of "replica" within Solr.
All the Best,
Trey Grainger
Founder, Searchkernel
https://searchkernel.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 3:38 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Moving a conversation that was happening on the PMC list t
Just wanted to make sure everyone in the development and user community
here was aware of the conference and didn't miss the opportunity to submit
a talk by Wednesday if interested.
All the best,
Trey Grainger
Chief Algorithms Officer @ Lucidworks
https://www.linkedin.com/in/treygrainger/
s:
https://www.slideshare.net/treygrainger/how-to-build-a-semantic-search-system
All the best,
Trey Grainger
Chief Algorithms Officer @ Lucidworks
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:45 AM Moyer, Brett wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking for ideas on how to determine intent and drive r
This way, the xml query parser is loaded in as a version of the eDismax
query parser instead, and any queries the are trying to reference the xml
query parser through local params will instead hit the eDismax query parser
and use its parsing logic instead.
All the best,
Trey Grainger
SVP
Hi David, that's my fault. I need to do a final proofread through them
before they get posted (and may have to push one quick code change, as
well). I'll try to get that done within the next few days.
All the best,
Trey Grainger
SVP of Engineering @ Lucidworks
Co-author, Solr in Ac
he best way to access S3 right now.
Finally, remember that S3 is a service; if the S3 service is slow (for example
due to a heavy stream of request), then your operations with S3 will also be
slow.
Hope this helps and good luck,
Trey
-Original Message-
From: Amarnath palavalli [ma
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/CoreAdmin+API#CoreAdminAPI-RELOAD).
Best of luck,
Trey
From: Amarnath palavalli [mailto:pamarn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 3:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr with HDFS on AWS S3 - Server restart fails to load the core
What are you trying to accomplish by resetting the version number?
-Original Message-
From: Kris Musshorn [mailto:mussho...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: reset version number
Obviously deleting and rebuilding the core wi
r was the next one to take off),
and was later used heavily in baseball (the "on deck" batter was the one
warming up to go next) and probably elsewhere.
I've always understood the "on deck" searcher(s) being the same as the
warming searcher(s). So you have the "active
dler right now), but once it's finished
that could certainly be done. Just wanted to mention it as another approach
to solve this specific problem.
-Trey Grainger
SVP of Engineering @ Lucidworks
Co-author, Solr in Action
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Indeed,
I know a bunch of folks who would be likely attend the hackday (including
committers) will have some other meetings on Wednesday before the
conference, so I think that Tuesday is actually a pretty good time to have
this.
My 2 cents,
Trey Grainger
SVP of Engineering @ Lucidworks
Co-author, Solr
Hardika,
Parallel SQL and the accompanying JDBC connector only became available in Solr
6.x. Since Cloudera's Solr is only at 4.10, it will not have this feature.
Trey
-Original Message-
From: Hardika Catur S [mailto:hardika.sa...@solusi247.com.INVALID]
Sent: Friday, August 26,
anyone on the mailing list who is contemplating
buying it), it is a REALLY great book that will teach you the ins and outs
of how search relevancy works under the covers and how you can manipulate
and improve it. It's very well-written, and definitely worth the read.
Congrats again, guys.
Trey Gra
JSON
faceting API and the enhanced analytical capabilities therein. Once again,
several other talks on faceting and analytics, but there was quite a strong
committer focus on that topic.
Definitely worth checking out the slides and videos when they are posted -
lots of really good material all arou
I'd be very interested in taking a look if you post the code.
Trey Grainger
Co-Author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Recommendations @ CareerBuilder
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, r b wrote:
> I've been working on something that just monitors ZooKeeper to
d if you are okay
losing IDF per-field (you'll still have it globally across all fields). If
you want to use a catch-all field, but still want to boost content based
upon the field it originated within, you can accomplish this with payloads.
All the best,
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
his without adding
in extra levels to make it look like the input side, so this is an
exception case even thought it seems syntactically valid.
So in conclusion, I'd give a strong vote to the flatter structure. Can
someone enumerate the benefits of the current format over the flatter
structure
th the ICUTokenizer then it will work to a point, but some of the
problems Walter mentioned may eventually bite you if you are supporting
certain groups of languages.
All the best,
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Recommendations @ CareerBuilder
On M
rms from the main query (q parameter)
execution::
q=python OR solr OR hadoop&sort=uniquematchedterms() desc,score desc.
I don't think anything like this exists, but would love some suggestions if
anyone else has solved this before.
Thanks,
-Trey
be talking about
multilingual search in November at Lucene/Solr Revolution, so I'd ideally
like to finish before then so I can demonstrate it there.
Thanks,
-Trey Grainger
Director of Engineering, Search & Analytics @ CareerBuilder
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Jorge Luis Betancourt G
No problem, Mike. Glad you got it sorted out.
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Analytics @ CareerBuilder
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> On 4/27/14 7:02 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
uments which are both a type of
book and also match the "q=toto" query, you should get 0 documents and thus
the counts of all your facet values will be zero.
As you mentioned, it is possible to utilize tags and excludes to change the
behavior described above, but hopefully this ans
complicated. At any rate, that's the
specific answer to your specific question about whether it is possible to
utilize multiple Analyzers within a field based upon multiple inputs.
All the best,
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Analytics @ CareerBuil
d and run the code examples for free, though they may be harder to
follow without the context from the book.
Thanks,
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Analytics @CareerBuilder
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
>
ook.
Best regards,
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Analytics @CareerBuilder
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Philippe Soares
wrote:
>
> Thanks Trey !
> I just tried to download my copy from my manning account, and this final
> version
*full
source code are also available* at http://solrinaction.com.
I would love it if you would check the book out, and I would also
appreciate your feedback on it, especially if you find the book to be a
useful guide as you are working with Solr! Timothy Potter and I (Trey
Grainger) worked tireless
on/tree/master/src/main/java/sia/ch14
Of course, if you want to take a simpler route, you can always just copy
your text to two separate fields (one per language) and then search across
them at query time using the eDisMax query parser. There are pros and cons
to both approaches.
All the best,
-
FYI, the last distributed pivot facet patch functionally works, but there
are some sub-optimal data structures being used and some unnecessary
duplicate processing of values. As a result, we found that for certain
worst-case scenarios (i.e. data is not randomly distributed across Solr
cores and req
ng to
be much simpler than putting it all into the field to be analyzed to begin
with (or better yet having an update request processor do it for you -
including the detection of language boundaries - inside of Solr so the
customer doesn't have to worry about it).
-Trey
On Tue, Oct 29, 201
Hmm... haven't run into the case where null was returned in a multi-valued
scenario yet... I probably just haven't tested that case. I likely need to
add a null check there - thanks for pointing it out.
-Trey
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Müller, Stephan <
muel...@ponton-
= this
(in QueryValueSource).
This should be an easy fix. I'll create a JIRA ticket to use better key
names in these functions and push up a patch. This will eliminate the need
for the extra NoOp function.
-Trey
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> I'm persuing
n/java/sia/ch14/MultiTextFieldLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessor.java
Good luck!
-Trey
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Müller, Stephan <
muel...@ponton-consulting.de> wrote:
> > I suspect that it is an oversight for a use case that was not considered.
> > I mean, it should probably either
ached in a ThreadLocal context
depending upon to the internal ReusePolicy, and I'm skeptical that you'll
be able to pull this off cleanly. It would really be hacking around the
Lucene API's even if you were able to pull it off.
-Trey
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Jack Krupan
in my implementation, but I could see where it might
be more user-friendly for many Solr users.
I'm just finishing up the "multilingual search" chapter and code now and
will be happy to post it to SOLR-5053 once I finish in the next few days if
this would be helpful to you.
-Trey
x27;s JIRA comment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4478
Thanks,
-Trey
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Also consider where SolrCloud is going. Trying to correctly maintain
> all the solr.xml files yourself on all the nodes would have
> been..."
Please add TreyGrainger to the the contributors group. Thanks!
-Trey
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> The wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ has come under attack by
> spammers more frequently of late, so the PMC has decided to lock it down in
> an attempt
ENE-4641 that is
really critical to our searches is the WordDelimiter filer.
My current index time filter config (which I believe has bee unchanged for me
for 5+ years):
Does anyone have any suggestions deal with this? Perhaps limiting certain
options will always produce tokens in order
r 3.3. One of these days I'll
remove the JSP dependency and this may eventually making it into trunk.
Thanks,
-Trey Grainger
Search Technology Development Team Lead, Careerbuilder.com
Site Architect, Celiaccess.com
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Gabriele Kahlout
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
ene index files, which should be a safe assumption considering
you're trying to put the whole index in a ramdisk.
-Trey
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> What I expect is happening is that the Solr caches are effectively making the
> two tests identical, usin
ushed up a patch
into the 3x branch and trunk for this issue. I can confirm that
applying the patch (or just removing startup replication) resolved the
issue for us.
Do you think this is your issue?
Thanks,
-Trey
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Bernd Fehling
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
>
&g
Good to know; I'll go change those settings, then. Thanks for the feedback.
-Trey
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Em wrote:
>
> This really helps at the mailinglists.
> If you send your mails with Thunderbird, be sure to check that you enforce
> plain-text-emails. If not, i
t?
Thanks,
-Trey
Thank you, Yonik!
I see the Jira issue you created and am guessing it's due to this issue.
We're going to remove replicateAfter="startup" in the mean-time to see if
that helps (assuming this is the issue the jira ticket described).
I appreciate you taking a look at this.
Th
nfig.xml]:
true
commit
optimize
startup
10
30
false
1
Thanks in advance,
-Trey
lighter.java:379) ...
>>
>> I also set the value to a value larger than the possible size of the field
>> but I still get a left truncated highlight in many cases.
>>
>>
>> hl.fragListBuilder and hl.fragmentsBuilder sound like they may be relevant
>> but I ha
This is my highlighter set up for the time being.
true
true
3
1
200
true
Any suggestions? Thanks.
I'm running revision 1021880 in the lusolr 3_1 branch.
Trey Hyde
th...@centraldesktop.com
Central Desktop, Inc.
Organize, Share, Collaborate
can't tell what problem you are trying to
solve), but I thought it would be worth mentioning as one tool in your
toolbox.
-Trey
>
>
>
>
: reloading the core just to reset the stats definitely seems like throwing
: out the baby with the bathwater.
Agreed about throwing out the baby with the bath water - if stats need to be
reset, though, then that's the only way today. A reset stats button would
be a nice way to prevent having to
negligable and
the time to reload is essentially zero.
The primary disadvantage of the core reloading approach is that your warmed
caches are dropped (if you are using caches on that core), but as long as
you have good warmup queries you should be okay as long as the reload isn't
constant.
-Trey
O
Or, (as Joe Calderon said in the apparent sibling thread) you can just type
"ant clean dist" if you want to verifiably blow away the old jars and
replace them with the new jars/war to deploy.
-Trey
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Trey wrote:
> Hmm... sorry for the bad link.
;ant generate-maven-artifacts' to generate maven artifacts.
[echo] Use 'ant package' to generate zip, tgz, and maven artifacts for
dist
ribution.
[echo] Use 'ant luke' to start luke. see: http://www.getopt.org/luke/
[echo] Use 'ant test' to run unit t
y suggestions on a change to my GC settings or solrconfig.xml to match with
changes in 1.4?
I'm going to add an SSD L2ARC to get some better performance but that will not
help my GC issues.
Trey Hyde
th...@centraldesktop.com
Central Desktop, Inc.
Organize, Share, Collaborate
can attach the
same way. The last step (after you've made your changes) is that you would
just need to rebuild with Ant (run "ant" from the directory containing the
build.xml file to see the build options for Solr). I think that just
running "ant example" there should do th
Hi All,
It seems I have a corrupt index on disk on my Master, but the live
IndexReader is still working. I don't want to restart Solr (1.4), because
I'm pretty sure the corrupt index will be loaded upon restart, causing me to
delete and rebuild the index from source. Is there any way to restore
shared by multiple users?
-Trey
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Matthieu Labour
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> Shall I set up Multiple Core or Single core for the following use case:
>
>
>
> I have X number of users.
>
>
>
> When I do a search, I always know for which
error
> happened.
> >
> > I'm not looking at the source code now, but is that really the only error
> you got? No exception stack trace?
> >
> > Otis
> > --
> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> >
> >
> &g
Does anyone know what would cause the following error?:
10:45:10 AM org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller copyAFile
SEVERE: *Unable to move index file* from:
/home/solr/cores/core8/index.20100119103919/_6qv.fnm to:
/home/solr/cores/core8/index/_6qv.fnm
This occurred a few days back and we notic
I played around with it and am also getting a NullPointerException on Solr
1.4, as well (albeit with a slightly different dump). Some of my documents
actually return, FYI, just not all. I'm on a on a multi-solr-core system
searching /solr/core1/admin/luke?id=MYID. My Exception looked different,
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: My (our) query plugin uses specialized SolrCache's in lieu of the meta
: data records. For each new searcher installed each fields possible
: values will be determined and stored in a cache (off the top of my head,
Are you determining the field values based on all in
My (our) query plugin uses specialized SolrCache's in lieu of the meta
data records. For each new searcher installed each fields possible
values will be determined and stored in a cache (off the top of my head,
some fields have a cardinality of well over 500k). Each time a query is
run that r
66 matches
Mail list logo
