We run both, and we are running the latest versions for both. There are
different use cases for each one. Where we are using solrcloud, it only has to
operate in one datacenter, and sharding is incredibly important because we have
billions and billions of documents. In a separate group of ser
se case (I don't think I can even
do what I'm doing with old facets). Why would daterangefield work with the old
faceting system and not the new?
--
Steve
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just trying to do a sense che
Hi everyone,
Just trying to do a sense check on this. I'm trying to do a facet based off a
DateRangeField and I'm hitting this error:
Error from server at
http://172.20.141.150:8983/solr/instock_au_shard1_replica0: Unable to range
facet on
field:sku_history.date_range{type=daterange,properti
s.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9527> (on issue #2), but it
appears to occur without the patch as well. I haven't seen this issue with solr
6.1.0 despite extensive testing. I haven't confirmed if this occurs on the
official 6.2.0 release build. I will try to confirm and gather more dat
egarding 1st issue, does backup command succeeds? Also do you see any
warning/error log messages? How about the restore command?
Thanks
Hrishikesh
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're very excited about SolrCloud'
Hi everyone,
We're very excited about SolrCloud's new backup / restore collection APIs,
which should introduce some major new efficiencies into our indexing workflow.
Unfortunately, we've run into some snags with it that are preventing us from
moving into production. I was hoping someone on t
etting file length for [segments_4o]
> java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException:
> /var/solr/data/instock_shard5_replica1/data/index.20160516230059221/segments_4o
>
> --
> Steve
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Weiss
> mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com><mail
index.20160516230059221/segments_4o
--
Steve
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
OK, so we did as you suggest, read through that article, and we reconfigured
the autocommit to:
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:3}
false
${solr.autoSoftCommit.max
ch for each shard.
Here's a long blog on commits:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
> Yes, after startup there was
#x27;s
the only way I can imagine that Solr "healed" itself.
I've got to point back to the Solr logs. Are they showing
any anomalies? Are any nodes in recovery when you restart?
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
&
all nodes? Even if we had to trigger
that manually after indexing, it would be fine. It's a very controlled
indexing workflow that only happens once a day.
--
Steve
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
Each node has one JVM with 16GB o
ee
exceptions in your Solr logs that will shed light on the issue.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Stephen Weiss
mailto:steve.we...@wgsn.com>> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm running into a problem with SolrCloud replicas and thought I would ask
> the list to se
Hi everyone,
I'm running into a problem with SolrCloud replicas and thought I would ask the
list to see if anyone else has seen this / gotten past it.
Right now, we are running with only one replica per shard. This is obviously a
problem because if one node goes down anywhere, the whole collec
ues.
What's the version of Solr? Can't it happen you inherited schema.xml from the
older version of Solr?
Which "Web-based queries work fine," you run exactly and what's the output with
debugQuery=true?
How exactly do you obtain dateRangeField? are you sure that
"sku_history.d
Hi everyone,
I'm running into a trouble building a query with DateRangeField. Web-based
queries work fine, but this code throws an NPE:
dateRangeQuery = dateRangeField.getRangeQuery(null,
SidxS.getSchema().getField("sku_history.date_range"), start_date_str,
end_date_str, true, true);
ERROR
cs are numbered from zero. So to
check them against the full index bitset, I'd be doing
Bitset.exists(indexBase + docid)
Just one thing to check
Roman
On Aug 3, 2015 1:24 AM, "Stephen Weiss" >
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to write a PostFilter for Solr 5.
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to write a PostFilter for Solr 5.1.0, which is meant to crawl
through grandchild documents during a search through the parents and filter out
documents based on statistics gathered from aggregating the grandchildren
together. I've been successful in getting the logic co
Forgive me if this seems like a dumb question but have you tried the
Apache_Solr_Service class?
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-php-apachesolr/index.html
It's really quite good at handling the nuts and bolts of making the HTTP
requests and decoding the responses for PHP. I almost
There's a project out there called LIRE (I heard about it on this list) that's
supposed to create a lucene-based CIBR index for images. I wonder if this
could be integrated with Solr? Personally I don't really care about the flower
part, I'm more worried about searching whether the flower is r
We have been having problems with SOLR on one project lately. Forgive
me for writing a novel here but it's really important that we identify
the root cause of this issue. It is becoming unavailable at random
intervals, and the problem appears to be memory related. There are
basically two
I think an examples page would be a good idea. We've already
implemented search in Chinese, Japanese, and Spanish back with 1.3,
but it was not really very well laid out how it was supposed to work -
I had to dig through bits and pieces of people's configs left in the
mailing list archives
+1
I have several projects backburnered in the hope realtime search will
come to solr soon...
[m]
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Don Werve wrote:
Realtime search, hands down.
Hi Shalin,
Thanks for your reply. Please see below.
On Jan 18, 2010, at 4:19 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Stephen Weiss
wrote:
...
When we replicate
manually (via the admin page) things seem to go well. However, when
replication is triggered by a
Hi Solr List,
We're trying to set up java-based replication with Solr 1.4 (dist
tarball). We are running this to start with on a pair of test servers
just to see how things go.
There's one major problem we can't seem to get past. When we
replicate manually (via the admin page) things se
Sorry, know I'm a little late in replying but the LukeRequestHandler
tip was just what I needed! Thank you so much.
--
Steve
On Dec 25, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I've noticed this as well, usually when working with a large field
cache. I
: haven't done in-depth analysis
We've been using Solr 1.4 for a few days now and one slight downside
we've noticed is the stats page comes up very slowly for some reason -
sometimes more than 10 seconds. We call this programmatically to
retrieve the last commit date so that we can keep users from
committing too frequentl
I just noticed this and it reminded me of an issue I've had with
collapsed faceting with an older version of the patch in Solr 1.3.
Would it be possible, if we can get the terms for all the collapsed
documents on a field, to then facet each collapsed document on the
unique terms it has col
Hi everyone,
I have what's probably a loaded question about how Solr parses queries.
Basically, the client wants to restructure the way they handle
permissions. Instead of assigning specific permissions ids (as we've
done up until this point), they want to structure permissions by
adding
If I'm not mistaken, you should index name as field type "string" -
right now you are probably using "text" so it is tokenizing on the
Uppercase characters. If you use "string" type this shouldn't
happen. You could use a copyField to make a separate "name_string"
field so that you can do
Isn't it possible that the production equipment is simply under much
higher load (given that, since it's in production, your various users
are all actually using it), vs the QA equipment, which is only in use
by the people doing QA?
We've found the same thing at one point - we had a very sm
t).
Check out http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters and the example config for the
Porter Stemmer:
protected="protwords.txt" />
HTH
Brendan
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Stephen Weiss wrote:
Hi,
I've hit a bit of a problem with destemming and
Hi,
I've hit a bit of a problem with destemming and could use some advice.
Right now there is a word in the index called "Stylesight" and another
word "Stylesightings", which was just added. When users search for
"Stylesightings", the client really only wants them to get results
that matc
Thanh,
Do the categories have id numbers? What we do is we index the ID
numbers of our tags and categories, and then on display we pull the
real text out of the database. In our situation, since the tags and
categories are multilingual, it's a lot easier than converting from
English to
If someone's birthday falls on a leap year, in most countries their
birthday is considered to be February 28th unless it happens to be a
leap year. You could make the field a float, encode the day number as
59.5, so it will match where it should, and write special handling
along these line
I have a very similar setup and that's precisely what we do - except
with JSON.
1) Request comes into PHP
2) PHP runs the search against several different cores (in a multicore
setup) - ours are a little more than "slightly" different
3) PHP constructs a new object with the responseHeader a
Yeah honestly I don't know how it ever worked either.
The notes in the wiki seem to indicate that syntax (with multiple
nodes) will be supported in Solr 1.4, not 1.3 - but I guess it really
just means that you can't combine those with a node yet.
I'll miss the deletesPending stat, I think
There's an experimental patch for this I've had pretty good success
with:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
If you don't particularly need faceting support to work 100% it's
already pretty perfect. Officially I guess they want it to make it in
for version 1.5?? But in the me
Hi,
This might be a very silly question that's documented everywhere but I
just can't find an answer right now.
When we first implemented solr we used version 1.2 (of course, 1.3 was
released days afterwards). In the brief period we used 1.2, whenever
we wanted to delete a bunch of docum
Like an earlier poster, my issue isn't on the laptop, it's with my
mobile device. The sheer volume of e-mail overwhelms the thing
sometimes (right now, for instance). There's really no option for
moving the e-mail off to some other folder, it just all goes to one
place.
Perhaps that mea
I third the motion SOLR is the second largest contributor to my e-
mail glut (my company's marketing is #1). I often have no idea what
area of Solr I'm actually asking about when I have a question, so I
would disagree and say a general forum provides a place to post when
you don't reall
Try using fieldtype "string" instead of "text" for the UserName
field. Then it will not be tokenized so it should only give exact
matches.
--
Steve
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:27 AM, mahendra mahendra wrote:
Hi,
I have indexed my data as "custom123, customer, custom" for the
"UserName" fiel
I've been wondering about this one myself - most of the services we
have installed work this way, if they crash out for whatever reason
they restart automatically (Apache, MySQL, even the OS itself).
Failures are detected and corrected by the load balancers and also in
some cases by the ma
On Jan 11, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Mike Shredder wrote:
Hi ,
I'm new to Solr .. I've been able to get Solr up & running. But
got
some quick questions.
1) How do I filter results based on permissions from an external
database
system ?
--> Should I implement a queryfilter which will
Actually I think this is a PHP error, not a Java error (I certainly
recognize it from PHP, in Java the error is usually more like
OutOfMemoryException).
Check the server's php.ini file for a line like this:
memory_limit = 16M
and try setting it to something more reasonable:
memory_limit =
I believe the german porter stemmer should handle this. I haven't
used it with SOLR but I've used it with other projects, and basically,
when the word is parsed, the umlauts and also accented vowels are
converted to plain vowels. I guess with SOLR you use
solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory:
I think in this case you would want to index each question with the
possible referrers ( by title might be too imprecise, I'd go with
filename or ID) and then do a search like this (assuming in this case
it's by filename)
q=(referring:TomCruise.html) OR (question: Tom AND Cruise)
Which see
s
around that.
-John
On Dec 11, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Stephen Weiss
wrote:
Yes, only ivan patch 2 (and before, only ivan patch 1), my sense
was these patches were meant to be used in isolation (there were no
notes saying to apply any other patches first).
Are you using patches for any oth
thanks for the advice.
I just downloaded a completely clean version, haven't even tried to
build it yet.
Applied the same, and I received exactly the same results.
Do you only apply the ivan patch 2? What version of patch are you
running?
-John
On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Stephen We
to only execute when builder.isNeedDocSet=true.
In the field collapsing patch that I'm using, I've got code to
remove a previous 'response' from the builder.rsp so we don't have
duplicates.
Now, if I could get field collapsing to work properly with a docSet/
docList
Are you sure you have a clean copy of the source? Every time I've
applied his patch I grab a fresh copy of the tarball and run the exact
same command, it always works for me.
Now, whether the collapsing actually works is a different matter...
--
Steve
On Dec 11, 2008, at 1:29 PM, John Mart
ginning of the year, so I'm somewhat
familiar.
I'll try and get a look this weekend. It's the earliest I''m likely
to get spare cycles. I'll post any results.
Tracy
On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Stephen Weiss wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use field collapsi
Hi,
I'm trying to use field collapsing with our SOLR but I just can't seem
to get it to do anything.
I've downloaded a dist copy of solr 1.3 and applied Ivan de Prado's
patch - reading through the source code, the patch definitely was
applied successfully (all the changes are in the right
Hi,
A requirement has come up in a project where we're going to need to
group by a field in the result set. I looked into the SOLR-236 patch
and it seems there are a couple versions out now that are supposed to
work against the Solr 1.3.0 release.
This is a production site, it really can
import for indexing (I think) and then it's just a matter of
pointing the
search box at the Solr instance, I suppose.
On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:19 PM, Stephen Weiss wrote:
Hi,
We recently implemented Solr for one major search component of our
site,
and now that this is complete we'
Hi,
We recently implemented Solr for one major search component of our
site, and now that this is complete we're turning to other areas of
our site to see where Solr can help us improve results relevancy and
performance.
One major area where I think Solr could do a lot of good is to repla
I've actually seen cases on our site where it's possible to bring up
over 30,000 facets for one query. And they actually come up quickly -
like, 3 seconds. It takes longer for the browser to render them.
--
Steve
On Oct 30, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
the only 'limit' is th
_ won't be
dropped). You could set up another field for use with wildcard
queries, or you could create separate query and index analyzers for
textTight and set the index analyzer to use a WordDelimiterFilter that
also indexes the original token.
-Yonik
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Ste
008, at 1:54 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
These query parsing results don't match with the config you've posted.
Double-check the type of the "name" field and that you have restarted
Solr since changing the schema.xml
-Yonik
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Weiss
<[E
che.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters?highlight=(t
okenizer)#head-1c9b83870ca7890cd73b193cefed83c283339089
The admin analysis page and query debug will help a lot to see what's
going on.
-Todd
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Weiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Hi,
So I've been using the textTight field to hold filenames, and I've run
into a weird problem. Basically, people want to search by part of a
filename (say, the filename is stm0810m_ws_001ftws and they want to
find everything starting with stm0810m_ (stm0810m_*). I'm hoping
someone mig
Hi,
I'm running Solr 1.2, we are not able to upgrade yet. We've started
using synonyms to make the search results better but a few of the
synonyms turn out to have unexpected results. We have modifications
to our synonyms file that need to go in very quickly but I can't seem
to figure o
I was just dealing with this issue the other day!
My solution was to have PHP re-parse the dates to always be exactly at
midnight of their respective day (so that the extra time info wouldn't
affect sorting), and then when the dates are displayed my format
string only includes date info...
e
retrieved for further display.
Here's a link on that...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#head-af67aefdc51d18cd8556de164606030446f56554
If that's not it maybe seeing the schema would help.
--
Steve
On Aug 26, 2008, at 7:46 PM, jennyv wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:46 PM
I do this by specifying them in the query string:
fl=field_name1,field_name2,etc
See here: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-solr1/#searching
(table 2)
--
Steve
On Aug 26, 2008, at 6:36 PM, jennyv wrote:
Ack. Reading the FAQ would help. :-) I've fixed the sorting issue by
u
I'm not exactly a long-time user of Solr yet so forgive me if I'm
missing something really obvious here... but, if I'm not mistaken, you
just add to the end of your update XML. This is how I've
done all of my commits, I wasn't even aware there was a CLI method to
this.
I would worry abo
My issue with the logos presented was they made solr look like a
school project instead of the powerful tool that it is. The tricked
out font or whatever just usually doesn't play well with the business
types... they want serious-looking software. First impressions are
everything. While
Is there a fixed set of keywords? If so, I suppose you could simply
index these keywords into a field for each site (either through some
kind of automatic parser or manually - from personal experience I
would recommend manually unless you have tens of thousands of these
things), and then s
tokenizer, but now I
see there's PatternAnalyzer. I'll give it a shot.
Regards,
Steve
On Jun 10, 2008, at 5:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Stephen Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, in the plain text search, the user automatically searc
Hi,
I'm new to Solr (and Lucene) and I'm trying to work out just how I
could fit this technology into my app (I'm moving over from using
MySQL fulltext indexes). Things are actually going really well - the
facet functionality fits in just perfectly, and the basic full-text
searching is w
69 matches
Mail list logo
