Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently ("and" treated like "or")

2013-10-21 Thread Stavros Delsiavas
ike stopwords.txt. Compare these files between your two systems. Upayavira On Thu, Oct 17, 2013, at 07:18 AM, Stavros Delsiavas wrote: Unfortunatly, I don't really know what stopwords are. I would like it to not ignore any words of my query. How/Where can I change this stopwords-behaviour?

Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently ("and" treated like "or")

2013-10-16 Thread Stavros Delsiavas
words but the second does not. Did you expect stop words to be removed, or not? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Stavros Delsiavas Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:02 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently ("and"

Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently ("and" treated like "or")

2013-10-16 Thread Stavros Delsiavas
Okay I understand, here's the rawquerystring. It was at about line 3000: title:(into AND the AND wild*) title:(into AND the AND wild*) +title:wild* +title:wild* At this place the debug output DOES differ from the one on my local system. But I don't understand why... This is the local deb

Re: How to retrieve the query for a boolean keyword?

2013-10-16 Thread Stavros Delsiavas
I believe it is not possible. But you can easily split this in two query statements. First one: text:(“vacuna” AND “esteve news”) and the second: (text:(“vacuna”) OR text:(“esteve news”)) AND -text:(“vacuna” AND “esteve news”) The minus "-" excludes all entries of the first statemant. This