t;solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> : Subject: Re: _version_ as LongPointField returns error
> :
> : On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Shawn Feldman
> wrote:
> : > Why do you need doc values though? i'm never going to sort by version
> :
> : Solr needs a quic
Why do you need doc values though? i'm never going to sort by version
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:13 AM Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I think the _version_ field should be
> - indexed="false"
> - stored="false"
> - docValues="true"
>
> -Yonik
logged this ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10872
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:08 AM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> I changed all my TrieLong Fields to Point fields. _version_ always
> returns an error unless i turn on docvalues
>
>
>
>
> Getting this err
I changed all my TrieLong Fields to Point fields. _version_ always returns
an error unless i turn on docvalues
Getting this error when i index. Any ideas?
Remote error message: Point fields can't use FieldCache. Use
docValues=true for field: _version_
solr2_1|at
org.apache.solr
looks like this ticket was fixed in 6.6 SOLR-10718
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10718>
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:19 PM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> i added a ticket
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10718
>
> we'll see what happens
>
> On Fr
When solr is merging segments of the tlog what impact do dynamic fields
have? If i have 1k dynamic fields do i pay the cost on every merge or only
if the documents have those fields?
-shawn
If i add the /3 will i need to reindex?
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:50 AM Susheel Kumar wrote:
> Its should be _route_=myshard/3!
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Shawn Feldman
> wrote:
>
> > I am indexing with a composite hash of "myshard/3!myid"
> >
&g
I am indexing with a composite hash of "myshard/3!myid"
If i want to query with the _route_ param, what does my route look like
_route_=myshard/3!
or
_route_=myshard!
?
shawn
I've been working on a go library for solr that is zk aware for the past
few months. Here is my library. let me know if you'd like to contribute.
I compute the hashrange given a key and route and return the desired
servers in the cluster then have an sdk for query and for retries given
network ou
i added a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10718
we'll see what happens
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:03 PM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> I have the same exact issue on my box. Basic auth works in 6.4.2 but
> fails in 6.5.1. I assume its a bug. probably just
I have the same exact issue on my box. Basic auth works in 6.4.2 but fails
in 6.5.1. I assume its a bug. probably just hasn't been acknowledged yet.
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM Xie, Sean wrote:
> Configured the JVM:
>
> -Dsolr.httpclient.builder.factory=org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.P
3055570144985088), dev_list_segmentation_test_76661_recipients!
batch4...@x.com (1563055570144985089)]} 0 23
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:04 PM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> Here is the solr log of our test node restarting
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/uploads.hipchat.com/17705/1138911/fvKS3t5uAnoi0
Here is the solr log of our test node restarting
https://s3.amazonaws.com/uploads.hipchat.com/17705/1138911/fvKS3t5uAnoi0pP/solrlog.txt
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> Ercan, I think you responded to the wrong thread
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:02 PM Ercan
solr-start.com/>
> www.solr-start.com
> Welcome to the collection of resources to make Apache Solr search engine
> more comprehensible to beginner and intermediate users. While Solr is very
> easy to start with ...
>
>
>
>
>
> On 27 March 2017 at 15:25, Shawn Feld
6.4.2
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> What version of Solr is it?
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
>
>
> On 27 March 2017 at 15:25, Shawn Feldman wrote:
&g
We are also hard committing at 15 sec and soft committing at 30 sec. I've
found if we change syncLevel to fsync then we don't lose any data
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:30 PM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> 6.4.2
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
&g
When we restart solr on a leader node while we are doing updates, we've
noticed that some small percentage of data is lost. maybe 9 records out of
1k. Updating using min_rf=3 or full quorum seems to resolve this since our
rf = 3. Updates then seem to only succeed when all nodes are back up. Why
17 matches
Mail list logo
