Hi,
We have been using Solr for last three years without any problem.
We have recently migrated our servers to a new datacenter, and our
servers have been upgraded as well. We also used this opportunity to
upgrade the software we use in our infrastructure. As a result of
this, Solr is upgraded to
or not use the term* directives. It still gives perfect result
so I am not using them.
Thanks everyone, I hope they will be useful for others as well.
Serdar
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Serdar Sahin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. However as I said before, termOffsets/termPositions/te
; In general, highlighting has been a problem area all along and there
> are little edge cases that I don't know how to solve.
>
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Serdar Sahin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the replies, I could have chance today to test them.
gination.com/search/out?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.apache.org%2Fsolr%2FFieldOptionsByUseCase
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> > (10/05/05 22:08), Serdar Sahin wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently, there are similar topics acti
retrieving (but still searching) the plainText field, it drops
to 0.0094 seconds. So I think if I can get the first 256 characters without
using the highlighting, I will get better performance.
Any suggestions regarding with these two problems will highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Serdar Sahin
file name from the
>> database record, and then load the file as a field and process the
>> text with Tika.
>>
>> It will not be easy :) but it is possible.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
>>
>> On 4/17/10, Serdar Sahin wrote:
>&g
Hi,
I am rather new to Solr and have a question.
We have around 200.000 txt files which are placed into the file cloud.
The file path is something similar to this:
file/97/8f/840/fa4-1.txt
file/a6/9d/ab0/ca2-2.txt etc.
and we also store the metadata (like title, description, tags etc)
about the
