ndeep
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Sandeep,
>
> This type of operation can often be expressed as a PostFilter very
> efficiently. This is particularly true if the region id's are integer keys.
>
> Joel
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:
, we can
throw more hardware to the index - but the index will still be only on a
single machine for atleast 6 months.
Regards,
Sandeep Gupta
email thread,
> right?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Sandeep Gupta
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:58 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Class name of parsing the fq clause
>
>
> Thanks Jack for detailing out the p
Thanks Jack for detailing out the parser logic.
Would it be possible for you to say something more about filter cache code
flow... sometimes we do not use fq parameter in query string and pass the
raw query
Regards
Sandeep
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Start wit
to the index - but the index will still be only
on a single machine for atleast 6 months.
Best Regards,
Sandeep Gupta
Hello All,
I want to know whether it is possible to make a query of word which has
synonym+wildcard.
For example : I have one field which is type of text_en (default fieldType
in 4.3.1)
And synonym.txt file has this entry
colour => color
Now when I am using full text search as colour* (with wil
Hi,
I think I will also wait for other people reply as I do not have much idea
now.
I suggested the things because I did it recently but I have only one
collection (default one) .
As you said and I can guess...
you have multiple collections like tt, shop and home in one solr instance..
By default
This problem looks to me because of solr logging ...
see below detail description (taken one of the mail thread)
-
Solr 4.3.0 and later does not have ANY slf4j jarfiles in the .war file,
so you need to put them in your
Hi Alex,
great please go ahead..
-Sandeep
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> This sounds like an excellent idea! :)
>
> Saqib
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Packt Publishing has kindly agreed to let
Hello,
I am able to configure solr 4.3.1 version with tomcat6.
I followed these steps:
1. Extract solr431 package. In my case I did in
"E:\solr-4.3.1\example\solr"
2. Now copied solr dir from extracted package (E:\solr-4.3.1\example\solr)
into TOMCAT_HOME dir.
In my case TOMCAT_HOME dir is pointe
> > > You must carefully go through the upgrade instructions starting from
> > > 1.4 upto 4.3. In particular the instructions for 1.4 to 3.1 and from
> > > 3.1 to 4.0 should be given special attention.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Sandee
PM, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
> > Also in application development side,
> > as I said that I am going to use HTTPSolrServer API and I found that we
> > shouldn't create this object multiple times
> > (as per the wiki document
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#HttpSolrS
mize
> at each step. That'll (I think) rewrite all the segments in the
> current format.
>
> Good luck!
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> wrote:
> > You must carefully go through the upgrade instructions starting from
> > 1.4 up
mize
> at each step. That'll (I think) rewrite all the segments in the
> current format.
>
> Good luck!
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> wrote:
> > You must carefully go through the upgrade instructions starting from
> > 1.4 up
Hello All,
We are planning to migrate solr 1.4 to Solr 4.3 version.
And I am seeking some help in this side.
Considering Schema file change:
By default there are lots of changes if I compare original Solr 1.4 schema
file to Sol 4.3 schema file.
And that is the reason we are not copying paste of s
15 matches
Mail list logo
