R
2016-03-03 14:12 GMT-05:00 Saïd Radhouani :
> Hello,
>
> Could you please add me to the Contributor Group. Here are my account
> info :
>
> - Name: Saïd Radhouani
> - User name: radhouani
> - email: said.radhou...@gmail.com
>
> For more info about myse
Hello,
Could you please add me to the Contributor Group. Here are my account info :
- Name: Saïd Radhouani
- User name: radhouani
- email: said.radhou...@gmail.com
For more info about myself, please visit my linked page:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhouani
Thanks,
-Saïd
2015-12-30 20:36 GMT
Hello,
Could you please add me to the Contributor Group. Here are my account info :
- Name: Saïd Radhouani
- User name: radhouani
- email: said.radhou...@gmail.com
For more info about myself, please visit my linked page:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhouani
Thanks,
-Saïd
2015-12-30 20:36 GMT
Hi - I'd appreciate if you could add me to the Contributor Group. Here are
my account info :
- Name: Saïd Radhouani
- User name: radhouani
- email: said.radhou...@gmail.com
Thanks,
-Saïd
Hi,
What resource are you using for LocalSolr?
Using the SpatialTierQParser, you can choose between km or mile:
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
Or, if you are using the LocalSolrQueryComponent
(http://www.gissearch.com/localsolr), and you can't choose
Hi,
Using Solr 1.4, I'm now working on adding spatial search options, such as
distance-based sorting, Bounding-box filter, etc.
To the best of my knowledge, there are three possible points we can start from:
1. The http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
2. Th
ml
> http://code.google.com/p/spatial-search-lucene/
> http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2008/02/spatial-search-with-lucene.html
>
> Regards
> Aditya
> www.findbestopensource.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Saïd Radhouani wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
Hi,
Using Solr 1.4, I'm now working on adding spatial search options, such as
distance-based sorting, Bounding-box filter, etc.
To the best of my knowledge, there are three possible points we can start from:
1. The http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
2. Th
Yes, indeed, you understood my question. Looking forward to the next version
then.
To your reply, I'd add that _val_ is used for standard request handler, and bf
is used for dismax, right?
-S
On Jul 10, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (10/07/10 0:54), Saïd Radhouani wrot
Hi,
I'm making some basic sorting (date, price, etc.) using the "sort" parameter
(sort=field+asc), and it's working fine. I'm wondering whether there's a
significant argument to use function query sorting instead of the "sort"
parameter?
Thanks,
-S
Thanks Koji for the reply and for updating wiki. As it's written now in wiki,
it sounds (at least to me) like MappingCharFilterFactory works only with
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory.
Did you really mean that? Because this filter works also with other tkenizers.
For instance, in my text type, I'm u
Hi,
I'm using Solr 1.4 and I need to use a Latin Accent Filter. In the Solr wiki
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaDesign), it's recommended to use
MappingCharFilterFactory instead of ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory.
Could someone tell me the reason of choosing the first filter instead of the
se
to test and see how it works.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
>
> On 3. juli 2010, at 01.11, Saïd Radhouani wrote:
>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Thanks for this suggestion.
x
> ((not|non|no) (smoker|smoking|smoke))...
>
> You could always do a mix also - to keep a free-text field as well, and any
> words that your parser does not understand can be passed through to the
> free-text as a "should" term with a boost.
>
> --
> Jan
Hi,
I have the following kind of data to index in a multilingual context: is_man,
is_single, has_job, etc.
Logically, the underlying fields have a value of "yes" or "no." That's why the
boolean type would be appropriate. But my problem is, in addition to be able to
filter on these fields, I wo
when frontend asks for "title",
> you intelligently try to pull out title_XY where XY is pulled from documents
> "language" metadata.
>
> I think which you choose depends on taste, each has its + and -
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> C
when frontend asks for "title",
> you intelligently try to pull out title_XY where XY is pulled from documents
> "language" metadata.
>
> I think which you choose depends on taste, each has its + and -
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> C
Hi,
I know this topic has been treated many times in the (distant) past, but I
wonder whether there are new better practices/tendencies.
In my application, I'm dealing with documents in different languages. Each
document is monolingual; it has some fields containing free text and a set of
fiel
t; because a-priori you don't know how many dynamic-fields to query. So in
> other words you can't just ask SOlr (though SolrJ lik you asked) to just
> return all dynamic fields beginning with pic_*. (afaik)
> - your client iterate code (looping the pics) is a bit more involved.
>
on the
> data and not doing anything intelligent with it.
>
> I assume btw that you don't want to sort/ facet on pic-desc / pic_caption/
> pic_url either ( I have a hard time thinking of a useful usecase for that)
>
> HTH,
>
> Geert-Jan
>
>
>
> 2010/6/26
gt; pic_caption_2
> pic_description_2
>
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Saïd Radhouani
>> To: solr-us
Hi,
I'm trying to index data containing a multivalued field "picture", that has
three properties: url, caption and description:
Thus, each indexed document might have many pictures, each of them has a url, a
caption, and a description.
I wonder wether it's possibl
Hi,
I'm using the Terms Component to se up the autocomplete feature based on a
String field. Here are the params I'm using:
terms=true&terms.fl=type&terms.lower=cat&terms.prefix=cat&terms.lower.incl=false
With the above params, I've been able to get suggestions for terms that start
with the sp
he server, whereas
> changing in the source drive you to redeploy your app and restart the
> server.
>
>
>
> On 6/21/10, Saïd Radhouani wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm developing a Web application that communicate with Solr using SolrJ. I
>
Hello,
I'm developing a Web application that communicate with Solr using SolrJ. I have
three search interfaces, and I'm facing two options:
1- Configuring one SearchHandler per search interface in solrconfig.xml
Or
2- Write the configuration in the java servlet code that is using SolrJ
It the
Thanks a lot Ahmet. Now I'm gonna learn new thing: how to apply a new patch
:)
Cheers.
2010/3/24 Ahmet Arslan
> > Yes, that's what I was expecting. Actually, I'd like
> > to highlight phrases
> > containing stopwords, like Terrain à sehloul
>
> Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter[1] can do that kind
2010/3/24 Ahmet Arslan
>
> > Thank a lot Ahmet. In addition, I want to highlight phrases
> > containing stop
> > words. I guess that the best way is to use a tokenized type
> > without
> > stopwordFilter. Do you agree with me defining a new type
> > for this purpose ?
>
> I am not sure about that
2010/3/24 Ahmet Arslan
> > With this configuration, the title field is highlighted
> > only when there's a
> > perfect match, i.e., the quoted query equals the title
> > content (f.i.,
> > q="Terrain sehloul" allows highlighting the entire title
> > containing "Terrain
> > sehloul",
>
> Exactly.
> I didn't know that you are using dismax. In your query fields list there is
> no title field. Probably match is coming from title_tokenized, and when you
> request highlighting from title (hl.fl=title) it returns empty snippets. If
> thats the case it is pretty expected because string typed field
2010/3/24 Ahmet Arslan
> > There's a match between the query and
> > the content of field I want to
> > highlight on. Solr is giving me the id of the document
> > matching my query,
> > but it's not displaying the field I want to highlight on.
> >
> > Here's the definition of the field I want to
There's a match between the query and the content of field I want to
highlight on. Solr is giving me the id of the document matching my query,
but it's not displaying the field I want to highlight on.
Here's the definition of the field I want to highlight on:
And here's part of my URL: /?
gt; > it's not working. I use "" and as you can see in my fieldType, I don't
> have
> > a stopword filter. Any idea?
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > -S.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/23 Markus Jelsma
> >
filter. Any idea?
Thanks a lot,
-S.
Thanks
2010/3/23 Markus Jelsma
> Hello,
>
>
> Check out the wiki [1] on what options to use for highlighting and other
> components.
>
>
> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
I have trouble with highlighting field of type "string". It looks like
highlighting is only working with tokenized fields, f.i., it worked with
text and another type I defined. Is this true, or I'm making a mistake that
is preventing me to have the highlighting option working on string?
Thanks for
gt; was parsed? Could you post your schema definitions for
> the field in question so folks can look at it?
>
> We need some details in order to actually be helpful ...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Saïd Radhouani >wrote:
>
> > I'm usin
I'm using the SnowballPorterFilterFactory for stemming French words. Some
words are not reconginized by this stemmer; I wonder wether, like synonyms
processing, the stemmers have the option of expansion.
Thanks.
I'm faceting with a two different query ranges while using addFacetQuery. I
wonder wether it's possible using SolrJ to extract the result of each query
range separately. Here's is an example:
addFacetQuery("price:[* TO 150]"); addFacetQuery("price:[151 TO 300]"); etc.
addFacetQuery("length:[* TO 5
Chris -
Shall I open a JIRA request to add this feature?
Thnx
2010/3/11 Chris Hostetter
>
> : I'm faceting with a query range (with addFacetQuery) and setting mincount
> to
> : 10 (with setFacetMinCount(10)), but Solr is not respecting this mincount;
> : it's still giving me all responses, eve
38 matches
Mail list logo
