implicit behavior. In other words, like
> you, I can't imagine a scenario where I would a multi-terms synonym be
> destructured in multiple OR clauses.
>
> Best,
> Andrea
>
>
> On 16/08/18 02:07, Roy Lim wrote:
>
>> I am not using edismax (eventually I would like to g
ismax
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Also sow=false should the the default on Solr 7 and above
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 6:27 PM Roy Lim wrote:
> >
> >> I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not
&g
I've subscribed, shall I re-post it then via email?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Thanks, updated original post. It just removed what I surrounded with the
raw text markup, I've added it back without markup. Not sure of the point
of raw text if it's always removed
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not working
correctly. Specifically, when I test a standard query with Solr Admin it is
still splitting on whitespace.
Here is my setup:
- Solr 7.2.1
- synonym LCD => liquid crystal display
- q=myfield:LCD
- added: sow=false
- myfie
Hi all, here's my setup:
6 x Solr (3 primary shard, 3 secondary)
3 x ZK
The client is indexing over 16 million documents using 8 threads. Auto-soft
commit is 3 minutes, auto-commit is 10 minutes.
The following timeout is observed in our client log, intermittently:
Thinking that this is a cas
