Frange Function Query

2011-07-21 Thread Rohit Gupta
Hi, I have the following query in which I am using !frange function twice and the query is not returning any results. However if i use a single !frange function then the results come for the same query. Is it now possible to execute two franges in a single query? q="woolmark"&fq={!frange l=33

Re: Need Suggestion

2011-07-15 Thread Rohit Gupta
I am using -Xms2g and -Xmx6g What would be the ideal JVM size? Regards, Rohit From: Mohammad Shariq To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, 15 July, 2011 7:27:38 PM Subject: Re: Need Suggestion below are certain things to do for search latency. 1) Do bul

Need Suggestion

2011-07-15 Thread Rohit Gupta
I am facing some performance issues on my Solr Installation (3core server). I am indexing live twitter data based on certain keywords, as you can imagine, the rate at which documents are received is very high and so the updates to the core is very high and regular. Given below are the document

!frange probelm

2011-07-11 Thread Rohit Gupta
Hi, I am trying to execute an !frange query, but I can't seem to get past the following error, Bad Request request: http://xyz.com:12397/solr/tw/select?q=(Organix)&fq={%21frange l=834925 u=834925}id&fq={%21frange l=834345 u=834345}id&sort=createdOnGMTDate desc&start=0&rows=26&wt=javabin&versi

SEVERE: SolrIndexWriter was not closed prior to finalize

2011-07-04 Thread Rohit Gupta
Hi, I am getting the following two error in my solr log file, SEVERE: SolrIndexWriter was not closed prior to finalize(), indicates a bug -- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!! and SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain timed out: NativeFSLock@/home/solr/simplify360/mult

Commit taking very long

2011-06-07 Thread Rohit Gupta
Hi, My commit seems to be taking too much time, if you notice from the Dataimport status given below to commit 1000 docs its taking longer than 24 minutes busy A command is still running... − 0:24:43.156 1001 1658 0 2011-06-07 09:15:17 − Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 1000 documents. Dele

Re: Master Slave help

2011-06-07 Thread Rohit Gupta
, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Rohit Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I have configured my master slave server and everything seems to be running > fine, the replication completed the firsttime it ran. But everytime I go the >the > replication link in the admin panel after restarting the serve

Master Slave help

2011-06-06 Thread Rohit Gupta
Hi, I have configured my master slave server and everything seems to be running fine, the replication completed the firsttime it ran. But everytime I go the the replication link in the admin panel after restarting the server or server startup I notice the replication starting from scratch or a

Re: URGENT HELP: Improving Solr indexing time

2011-06-05 Thread Rohit Gupta
least need a response to clarify ? > >On 4 June 2011 22:53, Chris Cowan wrote: >> How long does the query against the DB take (outside of Solr)? If >>that's slow >>then it's going to take a while to update the index. You might need to >>figure a >>wa

Re: URGENT HELP: Improving Solr indexing time

2011-06-04 Thread Rohit Gupta
#x27;s slow >then it's going to take a while to update the index. You might need to figure >a >way to break things up a bit, maybe use a delta import instead of a full >import. > > Chris > > On Jun 4, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Rohit Gupta wrote: > >> My Solr server tak

URGENT HELP: Improving Solr indexing time

2011-06-04 Thread Rohit Gupta
My Solr server takes very long to update index. The table it hits to index is huge with 10Million + records , but even in that case I feel this is very long time to index. Below is the snapshot of the /dataimport page busy A command is still running... 1:53:39.664 16276 24237 16273 0 2011-06-04

Re: Solr Range Facets

2011-05-18 Thread Rohit Gupta
Hi Chris, I made a mistake in explaining the second part of my question. If you notice the faceted result, you will notice for results for the 2nd May 2011 there are 4 results, but when I query for the 2nd May I should get only 1 result since after apply the offset all the remaining results s