s the reasoning behind your comment.
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 09:05 +0100, Rob Ganly wrote:
>
> > i used the 1.5 build a few weeks ago, implemented the geospatial
> > functionality and it worked really well.
> >
> > however due to the unknown quantity in t
i used the 1.5 build a few weeks ago, implemented the geospatial
functionality and it worked really well.
however due to the unknown quantity in terms of stability (and the uncertain
future of 1.5) etc. we decided not to use it in production.
rob ganly
On 8 June 2010 03:50, Darren Govoni wrote
s these kind of cases would come up.
very often these type of cases come up! i need to use it now... !
hopefully it'll be available soon.
rob ganly
2010/3/4 Kranti™ K K Parisa
> may be this is one very imp feature to be considered for next releases of
> SOLR. sometimes these kind of
00 records). i will report back if i discover any painful
issues with scaling up!
rob ganly
On 3 December 2009 18:21, Joel Nylund wrote:
> Just for an update on this, I tried text_rev and it seems to work great.
>
> So in summary, if you want partial word matches within a url or smal
i was wondering the same thing since:
'*NOTE: THE CURRENT GOAL IS TO START THE SOLR 1.4 RELEASE PROCESS
APPROXIMATELY ONE TO TWO WEEKS AFTER LUCENE JAVA 2.9 HAS BEEN RELEASED.* '
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr1.4
patiently,
rob
2009/10/16 Michael R.
>
> Any news on this? Lucene 2.9 is out
