Follow-up: Would anyone very familiar with DIH be willing to jump on a side
thread with me and my developer to help troubleshoot some issues we're
having? Please little r me at: robert [at] mavenbridge.com. Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Rob Veliz wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
I am running Solr from Magento and using DIH to import/index data from 1
other source (external). I am trying to query for results...two questions:
1. The query I'm using runs against "fulltext_1_en" which is a specific
shard created by the Magento deployment in solrconfig.xml. Should I
oo". If that's not multi-core, what's the
right approach to accomplish this?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/7/2013 12:07 AM, Rob Veliz wrote:
> > Great feedback, thanks. So the multi-core structure I have then is a
> > single Solr s
Solr server doesn't live on the same server as the Web app(s). Any
thoughts?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/6/2013 11:38 PM, Rob Veliz wrote:
> > Trying to find specific information to support the following scenario:
> >
> > - I have one
Trying to find specific information to support the following scenario:
- I have one site running on one server with marketing content, blog, etc.
I want to index.
- I have another site running on Magento on a different server with
ecommerce content (products).
- Both servers live in completely dif
t;none"
Another question I means to ask, is whether this sort of activity is logged
anywhere. I mean, after adding or deleting data, is there somewhere a record of
that action?
The 'logging' tab on the Dashboard page only reports errors as far as I can see.
Thanks,
- R
'http://localhost:8181/solr/development/update/csv?commit=true&separator=%09' --data @sample.tmpAll seems to be well:0221But when I query the development core, there is no data. I must be overlooking something trivial. I would appreciate if anyone could spot what! - Rob
nly be set on the first line of the .aff file, the .dic file should
be left alone.
Thanks again Sergey, that was very useful.
Best,
- Rob
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Сергей Бирюков wrote:
> Rob, as regards your "problem"
>
>> 'SET charset'
>>
nary files from the OpenOffice website.
I'm using Solr 4.0 (but had the same problem with 3.6)
- Rob
escalated to the Jiria list
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2934), but am not sure if
that was ever resolved. Or am I just missing something? In either
case, could anyone who has working dictionary files share them with me
(any old language; as long as it works!)
I am using Solr 3.6.1 on a Mac running OSX 10.7.5
- Rob
looks like it might actually be a zip file. try renaming/unzipping it.
cheers,
rob
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> I am uable to use the rar file from the site
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872.
>
> When I try to open it,I get
there's a newline
between them when indexed, but not when searched.
Do the filters (wdf in this case) not create multiple tokens, so if
splitting on period in "asp.net" would create tokens for all of "asp",
"asp.", "asp.net", ".net", &q
Not a java pro, and the documentation hasn't been updated to include these
instructions (at least that I could find). What do I need to do to perform
the steps that Alexandre is talking about?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DataImportHandler-in-Solr-4-0-tp2563
Recently had this myself...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#How_to_combine_with_a_sub-query_to_expand_results
--
IntelCompute
Web Design and Online Marketing
http://www.intelcompute.com
-Original Message-
From: dan whelan
Reply-to: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-us
I guess I could do a bit of pre-processing, look for any words that are
quoted, and search in a diff field for those
How is a query like this formulated?
q=unstemmed:perl or java&q=stemmed:manager
--
IntelCompute
Web Design and Online Marketing
http://www.intelcompute.com
-Original Mes
Yes, it looks like I'll have to do some pre-processing outside of Solr.
I don't mind giving users the option to query a differently indexed
field, ie, same content, but not stemmed, although this would apply to
all keywords they enter, so they couldn't allow stemming on one keyword,
but not anothe
could happen to us, too, down the road).
>
> JRJ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Nicholls [mailto:robst...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:32 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Replication issues with multiple Slaves
>
>
s no internal lock, that would be a serious matter (and could happen
to us, too, down the road).
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Rob Nicholls [mailto:robst...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Replication issues with multiple Slaves
or oddities I should be aware of that may
cause this?
Thanks,
Rob
obvious explanation or oddities I should be aware of that may
cause this?
Thanks,
Rob
-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multi CPU Cores
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:18:47 -0400
Try using -useParallelGc as vm option.
Johannes
On Oct 16, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Ken Krugler wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2011, at 1:44pm, Rob Brown wrote:
>
>> Looks
load using (-n and -c).
Johannes
On Oct 15, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Rob Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Solr on a machine with 16 CPU cores, yet watching "top"
> shows that java is only apparently using 1 and maxing it out.
>
> Is there anything that can be done to
Hi,
I'm running Solr on a machine with 16 CPU cores, yet watching "top"
shows that java is only apparently using 1 and maxing it out.
Is there anything that can be done to take advantage of more CPU cores?
Solr 3.4 under Tomcat
[root@solr01 ~]# java -version
java version "1.6.0_20"
OpenJDK Runt
Hi,
I'm running Solr on a machine with 16 CPU cores, yet watching "top" shows that
java is only apparently using 1 and maxing it out.
Is there anything that can be done to take advantage of more CPU cores?
Solr 3.4 under Tomcat
[root@solr01 ~]# java -version
java version "1.6.0_20"
OpenJDK Run
The setup for this question was to simplify the actual environment,
we're not actually demoting popular authors.
Perhaps index-time (negative) boosts are indeed the only way.
--
IntelCompute
Web Design and Online Marketing
http://www.intelcompute.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris H
Just to throw this out there, we use UK postal data for locations, 9m
records and do location lookups/searches by grouping on the first part
of the post code.
Works really well, but apologies for going even more off-topic :)
-Original Message-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT
Reply-to: solr-us
g
so instead of that "fq=-facetField:[* TO *]", something like
"fq=-car_make:Taurus". picking "negatives" might even make the UI a
bit easier.
anyway, just some thoughts. cheers,
rob
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Olson, Ron wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. As
you should probably post your schema.xml and some parts of your
synonyms.txt. it could be differences between your index and query
analysis chains, synonym expansion errors, etc, but folks will likely
need more details to help you out.
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:46 PM, deniz wrote
it's always been my understanding that the caches are discarded, then
rebuilt/warmed:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#Caching_and_Distribution.2BAC8-Replication
hth,
rob
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Mike Austin wrote:
> How does warming work when a collection
"exact" can mean a lot of things (do diacritics count?, etc), but in
this case, it sounds like you just need to turn off the stemmer you
have on this fieldtype (or create a new one that doesn't include the
stemmer).
hth,
rob
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Olson, Ron wrote:
&g
exact string...stopwords, synonyms, slop, etc.
cheers,
rob
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Chip Calhoun wrote:
> Is there a way to search for a specific string using Solr, either by putting
> it in quotes or by some other means? I haven't been able to do this, but I
> may b
sounds like the Luke request handler will get what you're after:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler#id
cheers,
rob
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Gabriele Kahlout
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With an inverted index t
i also thought of the lengthFilter stuff, provided it's a
text/KeywordTokenizer field:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LengthFilterFactory
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Have you tried setting 'facet.m
/LucidWorks-for-Solr/Reference-Guide
hope that helps,
rob
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:20 PM, antoniosi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How does solr index a numeric value? Does it index it as a string or does it
> keep it as a numeric value?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
a lot of this stuff is covered in the tutorial, and expanded in the
wiki. still the best places to start in figuring out the fundamentals:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
hth,
rc
On Mon,
it does seem a little weird, but q.alt will get what you want:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#q.alt
hth,
rc
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jason Chaffee wrote:
> Can you shed some light on what you did to configure it to handle *:*?
> I have the same issue that I need it
copyField should do the trick:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields
"A common requirement is to copy or merge all input fields into a
single solr field. This can be done as follows:-
"
hth,
rob
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Saler, Jeff wrote:
> Thanks
you could just explicitly send multiple sorts...from the tutorial:
&sort=inStock asc, price desc
cheers.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, kenf_nc wrote:
> Is sort order when 'score' is the same a Lucene thing? Should I ask on the
> Lucene forum?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> ht
if i'm understanding your question, it sounds like
localparams/tagging/exclusion might be what you want:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Multi-Select_Faceting_and_LocalParams
hth,
rob
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Tim Christensen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I a
just making sure that you're aware of the built-in replication:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
can pull the indexes, along with config files.
cheers,
rob
2010/12/15 Robert Gründler :
> Hi again,
>
> let's say you have 2 solr Instances, which have bo
you could look at the ping stuff:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#The_Admin.2BAC8-GUI_Section
cheers,
rob
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> As we know we can use browser to check if Solr is running by going to
> http://$hostName:$portNumber/$masterName/admi
tactic may workhope that helps,
rob
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Hasnain wrote:
>
> perhaps i wasnt clear in my earlier post
>
> if user searches for "swingline red stapler hammer hand rigid", then
> documents that matches max number of words written in query sh
s the reasoning behind your comment.
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 09:05 +0100, Rob Ganly wrote:
>
> > i used the 1.5 build a few weeks ago, implemented the geospatial
> > functionality and it worked really well.
> >
> > however due to the unknown quantity in t
i used the 1.5 build a few weeks ago, implemented the geospatial
functionality and it worked really well.
however due to the unknown quantity in terms of stability (and the uncertain
future of 1.5) etc. we decided not to use it in production.
rob ganly
On 8 June 2010 03:50, Darren Govoni wrote
s these kind of cases would come up.
very often these type of cases come up! i need to use it now... !
hopefully it'll be available soon.
rob ganly
2010/3/4 Kranti™ K K Parisa
> may be this is one very imp feature to be considered for next releases of
> SOLR. sometimes these kind of
> 2) i'm not entirely clear on the order in which suggestions are
> returned. for a search of "porgrams" against a subset of my data, i
> get these suggestions...i've added my own levenshtein calculations,
> provided they're correct:
>
> program: 3
> pulgram: 3
> porras: 2
> portrai
default
spell
./spellchecker
granted, i like that 'program' is at the top, and it has the highest
frequency in my corpus, but just want to make sure i can reliably
interpret these results.
cheers, and apologies if i'm just being dense,
rob
What do you mean you had to revert to Trunk 1.5. Do you mean upgrade? Which
version were you using before hand?
Can you please list the exact version of 1.5 and the patch # you used. I
downloaded the latest nightly build and tried patching using the 2/1 patch.
Everything went ok but I am gett
Thanks Ill give field-collapse-5 a try although I heard it has some bad memory
bugs in it.
> From: martijn.is.h...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:29:30 +0100
> Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi Blargy,
>
> The latest path is not compatible w
00 records). i will report back if i discover any painful
issues with scaling up!
rob ganly
On 3 December 2009 18:21, Joel Nylund wrote:
> Just for an update on this, I tried text_rev and it seems to work great.
>
> So in summary, if you want partial word matches within a url or smal
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?indent=on&version=2.2&q=climate&fq=awardinstrument_s:Continuing+grant
> Continuing grant
everything that erik already mentioned, but looks like you also have a
trailing space in the document, so even quoting it would require that
last space.
from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
"On wildcard and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is performed on
the search word."
i'd just lowercase the wildcard-ed search term in your client code,
before you send it to solr.
hth,
rob
On Wed, Jan 13,
On Sun 10/01/10 20:24 , Richard Marr wrote:
> Hi all,
> Apologies for the cross-post. If you're near London on Tuesday the
> 12th Jan (i.e. this Tuesday) please come along and geek with us over
> a
> beer or two. All experience levels welcome, don't be scared. Details
> on the Meetup page be
I'm also not sure what hooks you could put in upon the IP floating to the other
machine, to start/stop replication - if it IS an issue anyway.
On Mon 04/01/10 16:28 , Matthew Inger wrote:
> So, when the masters switch back, does that mean, we have to force a
> full delta update, correct?
>
Even when Master 1 is alive again, it shouldn't get the floating IP until
Master 2 actually fails.
So you'd ideally want them replicating to eachother, but since one will only be
updated/Live at a time, it shouldn't cause an issue with cobbling data (?).
Just a suggestion tho, not done it myse
Have you looked into a basic floating IP setup?
Have the master also replicate to another hot-spare master.
Any downtime during an outage of the 'live' master would be minimal as the
hot-spare takes up the floating IP.
On Mon 04/01/10 16:13 , Matthew Inger wrote:
> I'm kind of stuck and l
s, did the server have enough RAM to store it all in memory?
Cheers,
Rob
On Tue 29/12/09 18:23 , markwaddle wrote:
> I have an index that used to have ~38M docs at 17.2GB. I deleted all
> but 13K
> docs using a delete by query, commit and then optimize. A "*:*"
> query now
&g
;> > src/test/org/apache/solr/BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> |=======
> >> > >> |---
> >> src/test/org/apache/solr/BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java
> >> > >> (revision 891214)
> >> > >&
branch instead?
> > >> can't remember what i did last time to get
> field-collapse-5.patch
> > >> working successfully.
> > >> On Tue 22/12/09 22:43 , Lance Norskog wrote:
> > >> > To avoid this possible bug, you could change the cache to
> only
> > >> have a
> > >&g
Lance Norskog wrote:
> >> > To avoid this possible bug, you could change the cache to only
> >> have a
> >> > few entries.
> >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Martijn v Groningen
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > In the latest patch some changes where made o
> but if you add the CollapseComponent to the conf no field
> collapse
> > > cache should be enabled. If not let me know.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > 2009/12/22 :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
not let me know.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > 2009/12/22 :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue 22/12/09 12:28 , Martijn v Groningen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>> What patch are you actually us
sounds like a job for copyField:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#How_do_I_use_copyField_with_wildcards.3F
add sku_defaultPriceAll to your and then:
...query on sku_defaultPriceAll.
hth,
rob
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Gustavo wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have been
On Tue 22/12/09 12:28 , Martijn v Groningen wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> What patch are you actually using from SOLR-236?
> Martijn
> 2009/12/22 :
> > I've tried both, the whole fieldCollapsing tag, and just the
> > fieldCollapseCache tag inside it.
> >bot
actually i got field-collapse-5.patch, what's the diff?
On Tue 22/12/09 12:28 , Martijn v Groningen wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> What patch are you actually using from SOLR-236?
> Martijn
> 2009/12/22 :
> > I've tried both, the whole fieldCollapsing tag, and just th
Yup, that's the one, with a copy of trunk from last week.
On Tue 22/12/09 12:28 , Martijn v Groningen wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> What patch are you actually using from SOLR-236?
> Martijn
> 2009/12/22 :
> > I've tried both, the whole fieldCollapsing tag, and just th
I've tried both, the whole fieldCollapsing tag, and just the
fieldCollapseCache tag inside it.
both cause error.
I guess I can just set size, initialSize, and autowarmCount to 0 ??
On Tue 22/12/09 11:17 , Toby Cole wrote:Which elements did you
comment out? It could be the case that
see
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/10/20/result-grouping-field-collapsing-with-solr/
[1] for a good little howto.
and also http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing [2]
On Tue 22/12/09 11:03 , JKnight JKnight wrote:Dear all,
I have document doc.xml
3
Love you love me
2
Love story
3
That's what I assumed, but I'm getting the following error with it
commented out
MESSAGE null java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.solr.search.fieldcollapse.AbstractDocumentCollapser.createDocumentCollapseResult(AbstractDocumentCollapser.java:276)
at
org.apache.solr.search.fiel
Is
it possible to disable the field collapsing cache? I'm trying to
perform some speed tests, and have managed to comment out the filter,
queryResult, and document caches successfully.
on 1.5
...
...
collapse
facet
tvComponent
...
my
solconfig can be seen at http://www.intelcompute.com/solrconfig.xml
[1]
On Tue 22/12/09 10:51 , r...@intelcompute.com wrote:Is
it possible to disable the field collapsing cache? I'm trying to
perform some speed tests, and have managed to comment out the filter,
queryResult, and document caches
i don't think that's currently supported, but sure others will correct
me if i'm wrong:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/ac8cf41bdb761069/solr_replication_and_spellcheck_data
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, michael8 wrote:
>
> I'm cur
i was wondering the same thing since:
'*NOTE: THE CURRENT GOAL IS TO START THE SOLR 1.4 RELEASE PROCESS
APPROXIMATELY ONE TO TWO WEEKS AFTER LUCENE JAVA 2.9 HAS BEEN RELEASED.* '
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr1.4
patiently,
rob
2009/10/16 Michael R.
>
> Any news on this? L
this isn't advice on how to upgrade, but if you/your-project have a
bit of time to wait, 1.4 sounds like it's getting close to an official
releasefyi.
cheers,
rob
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> What's the best way to upgrade solr from 1.2.0 t
it sounds to me like the field you're using (artistText) is tokenized
and lowercased. it might be good to go over the wiki pages again:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
if you keep having problems, post your schema...cheers,
rob
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, A
provements, btw, with most example queries
taking less than 1/100th of the time
always very impressed with this project/product, and just thought i'd
add a "me-too" to the list...cheers, and have a great weekend,
rob
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECT
nfirmation, and thanks,
rob
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : /usr/local/build/apache-solr-1.3.0/src/java/org/apache/solr/analysis/
> : KStemFilterFactory.java:63:
> : cannot find symbol
> : [javac] symbo
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
thanks to everyone who contributed,
rob
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plea
...lots of good info in there.
cheers,
rob
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
>
> "foobar_facet" is a dynamic field. Its defined in my schema like this:
>
>
>
> I have the default search field set to text.
bram,
you'll want to look at the KeywordTokenizerFactory (which doesn't
actually tokenize), and then use the LowerCaseFilterFactory. the
schema in the example has a fieldType called 'alphaOnlySort' that
should get you started.
cheers,
rob
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:21 AM,
i'm using this:
*:* -[* TO *]
which is what lance suggested..works just fine.
fyi: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-381
On Dec 3, 2007 8:09 PM, Norskog, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't this be: *:* AND "negative query"
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
in,
rc
On Nov 28, 2007 8:11 PM, Norskog, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a few parameters for limiting what words are added to the
> dictionary. You might be trimming out 'thorne'. See this page:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandle
orne
true
any pointers as to what i'm doing wrong, misinterpreting? i suspect
i'm just doing something bone-headed in the analyzer sections...
thanks as always,
rob casson
miami university libraries
> the work arround is to include *:* in yoru query ...
>*:* -solr
> ... if/when this is fixed
> in Solr that's esentally what solr will do under the covers.
>
> (would you mind opening a bug to track this and mention the work arround
> for other people who encounter it)
will do.
thanks again.
piete,
thanks for the quick reply.
> You need to explicitly define the field you are referring to in order to
> achieve this, otherwise the query parser will assume that the minus
> character is part of the query and interpret it as field:"-solr" (where
> "field" is the name of the default field
i'm having no luck deleting by a negative query
indexing the example docs from 1.2, these steps work:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update --data-binary
'solr' -H 'Content-type:text/xml;
charset=utf-8'
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update --data-binary '' -H
'Content-type:text/xml; chars
86 matches
Mail list logo
