entities^200+inbound_text^1+bestlink_keywords^1&q=id:story|25584945c&ps=1&sort=time_published+desc
Thanks,
Renz
2009/8/5 Renz Daluz
> Thanks guys.
> I tried to boost it instead (as sort looks like not supported) but it's not
> taking effect. Here are the parameters that I
> > Bill
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> >
> > > You can boost the similarity field matches, if you want. Look for
> > mlt.boost
> > > at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis
> > >
> > > Cheers
Hi Chris,
Sorry for the very late reply. As a work around we sent the locking to
single and we turned-off one of our workers. And to answer your question,
please see below:
2009/7/17 Chris Hostetter
>
> This is relaly odd.
>
> Just to clarify...
> 1) you are running a normal solr installation (
Hi,
I'm looking at changing the result order when searching by MLT. I tried the
sort=, but it's not working. I check the wiki and can't find
anything. Is there a way to do this?
Thanks,
/Laurence
Is it best way to implement my own Locking mechanism here?
Thanks
/Renz
2009/7/10 Renz Daluz
> Hi all,
> I have 2 workers running (app that's builds the index) and both are
> pointing to the same "Solr" (1.3.0) master instance when updating/committing
> documents.
Hi all,
I have 2 workers running (app that's builds the index) and both are pointing
to the same "Solr" (1.3.0) master instance when updating/committing
documents. I'm using SolrJ to save the documents.
Then I have 4 slaves solr instance that gets index from master via rsync.
Now. from time to t
Hi,
When I'm doing normal search I'm using q=test +field:somevalue&otherparams...
How can I implement this using morelikethis by posting the text and q
is empty? I tried to use fq= but this is not what I want.
Thanks,
Renz
