Just found it.
Use {!ex=c key=ckey} ...
On 07/22/2013 11:35 AM, Ralf Heyde wrote:
Hello,
i need different (multiple) Facet exclusions for the same field. This
approach works:
http://server/core/select/?q=*:*
&fq={!tag=b}brand:adidas
&fq={!tag=c}color:red
&facet.field=
Hello,
i need different (multiple) Facet exclusions for the same field. This
approach works:
http://server/core/select/?q=*:*
&fq={!tag=b}brand:adidas
&fq={!tag=c}color:red
&facet.field={!ex=b}brand
&facet.field={!ex=c}brand
&facet.field={!ex=b,c}brand
&facet.field=brand
&facet=true&fac
Hello,
1. It depends on your query types & data (complexity, featureset,
paging) - geospatial could be something with calculation inside solr?
2. It depends massively on the document size & field-selection (load a
hundred of 100MB documents can take some time)
3. It depends especially on your d
Can you explain a little bit more, what you are trying to do?
I don't get, what you want to do.
On 07/06/2013 08:39 AM, aniljayanti wrote:
Hi,
I am working on solr 3.3. i am getting total 120 records with below query,
in response xml "numFound" is showing 540 records.
http://localhost:8080/te
I think people will pay 10$ :)
On 06/21/2013 03:04 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
I’m expecting to self-publish the first Early Access Release for my book, Solr
4.x Deep Dive, on lulu.com sometime today. It is still far from finished and
needs lots of work and missing a lot of important areas (Sol
Hello Folks,
is it possible to disable the replication for ALL cores using one
command? We currently use Solr 3.6.
Currently we have a curl operation, which fires:
http://:/solr//admin/replication/index.jsp?poll=disable
In the documentation there is a URL-Command which seems to be correct,
b
Hello,
just for information: the Solution might look like (1st approach):
I take the sourcecode of the BinaryResponsewriter and surround the
serialization with some tracking methods.
Then I create a custom QueryResponseWriter, which implements the binary
Response writer and voila, i get my sta
Hi Everybody,
The as is situation:
We have an application (on Server 1), which fires many (up to 20)
Solr-Queries (on Server 2) to produce the result. Since we have network
latency for transport and serialization, we will shift the Query-Part to
Server 2. The idea behind is, that the complete
t is actually parsed.
>
> 4. If there is any chance that you have modified your field type since
> originally indexing the data, be sure to completely reindex after ANY
> change
> in the field types.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf H
DisMax Query & Field-Filters (ASCIIFolding)
>
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Dismax querparser does not allow fielded queries. e.g. field:something
>
> Consider using edismax query parser instead.
>
> Also debugQuery=on will display informative output how query parsed
> analyzed
Hello,
I have an interesting behaviour.
I have a FieldType "Text_PL". This type is configured as:
So, one filter in the chain is the AS
.add(fc, s.numDocs(qp.parse(fc), results.docSet));
}
// in counts you have your facet-counts
}
catch (ParseException pe) {
pe.printStackTrace();
}
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:58:29 +0200
> Von: "Ralf Heyde"
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
Hello,
i'm currently devoloping a custom component in Solr.
This component works fine. The problem I have is, I only have an access to the
searcher which gives me the option to fire e.g. BooleanQueries.
This searcher gives me a result, which I have to iterate to calculate
informations which co
13 matches
Mail list logo
