Re: schema help

2008-03-11 Thread Rachel McConnell
Our Solr use consists of several rather different data types, some of which have one-to-many relationships with other types. We don't need to do any searching of quite the kind you describe, but I have an idea about it, depending on what you need to do with the book data. It is rather hacky, but

Re: Shared index base

2008-02-26 Thread Rachel McConnell
We tried this architecture for our initial rollout of Solr/Lucene to our production application. We ran into a problem with it, which may or may not apply to you. Our production software servers all are monitored for uptime by a daemon which pings them periodically and restarts them if a response

Re: negation

2008-02-13 Thread Rachel McConnell
you? > It sounds like something that could work quite well for me too, but I > would be a little worried that a commit could time out, and a unique > value could be lost for that user. > > Thank you > Alec > > On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Rachel McConnell wrote: > > >

Re: negation

2008-02-13 Thread Rachel McConnell
We do something similar in a different context. I don't know if our way is necessarily better, but it would work like this: 1. add a field to campaign called something like enteredUsers 2. once a user adds a campaign, update the campaign, adding a value unique to that user to enteredUsers 3. the

Re: duplicate entries being returned, possible caching issue?

2008-02-04 Thread Rachel McConnell
On 2/4/08, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2008 2:20 PM, Rachel McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you are running snapshooter asynchronously, this would be the cause. > > > It's designed to be run from solr (via a postCommit o

Re: duplicate entries being returned, possible caching issue?

2008-02-04 Thread Rachel McConnell
On 2/4/08, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2008 1:48 PM, Rachel McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/4/08, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 4, 2008 1:15 PM, Rachel McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: duplicate entries being returned, possible caching issue?

2008-02-04 Thread Rachel McConnell
On 2/4/08, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2008 1:15 PM, Rachel McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are using Solr's replication scripts. They are set to run every 20 > > minutes, via a cron job on the slave servers. Any further usef

Re: duplicate entries being returned, possible caching issue?

2008-02-04 Thread Rachel McConnell
er adding some > documents but before the duplicates have been removed. Are you using > Solr's replication scripts? > > -Yonik > > On Feb 1, 2008 6:01 PM, Rachel McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have just started seeing an intermittent problem in our producti

duplicate entries being returned, possible caching issue?

2008-02-01 Thread Rachel McConnell
We have just started seeing an intermittent problem in our production Solr instances, where the same document is returned twice in one request. Most of the content of the response consists of duplicates. It's not consistent; maybe 1/3 of the time this is happening and the rest of the time, one ret

Re: Interpretation of Solr log messages

2008-01-28 Thread Rachel McConnell
Thanks Hoss, so then it's actually the same values as returned in the query response header, e.g. (JSON format): {"responseHeader":{"status":0,"QTime":209},"response":{"numFound":2574, ... (omitted) thx, Rachel On 1/28/08, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : [10:58:26.507] /select >

Interpretation of Solr log messages

2008-01-28 Thread Rachel McConnell
Hello all, I'm not sure if this is a Solr question, but any pointers would be helpful. I am seeing this kind of thing in the stdout logs (I believe it to be entirely normal): [10:58:26.507] /select qt=relatedinstructables&q=music%0awall%0amount%0aguitar%0adiy%0astand%0amusicianhome+NOT+E7Z1HY8HQ