Hi,
When doing distributed searches with shards.tolerant set whilst the hosts for a
slice are down and therefore the response is partial, how best that inferred as
we would like to not cache the results upstream and perhaps inform the end user
in some way.
I am aware that shards.info could be
Let me know the JIRA number, I'd love to see work in this area.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hoy [mailto:p...@brightsolid.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 11:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr load balancer
Hi Erick,
Thanks, I have read the blogs you cit
1 AM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to experiment with some custom load balancers to help
> with query latency in the face of long gc pauses and the odd
> time-consuming query that we need to be able to support. At the moment
> setting the socket timeout via the H
m. Leading to more memory issues perhaps in a "non-virtuous
cycle".
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to experiment with some custom load balancers to help with query
> latency in the face of long gc pauses and the odd tim
Hi,
I would like to experiment with some custom load balancers to help with query
latency in the face of long gc pauses and the odd time-consuming query that we
need to be able to support. At the moment setting the socket timeout via the
HttpShardHandlerFactory does help, but of course it can o
ugh I think there
would need to be a nasty global variable to hold a reference to it...
-Simon
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a multi-core set up with a fairly large synonym file, all
> cores share the same schema.xml and synonym file but when
The Solr TermsComponent:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hoy
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Unique terms without faceting
Hi,
I know that you can use a facet query to get the u
Hi,
I know that you can use a facet query to get the unique terms for a field
taking account of any q or fq parameters but for our use case the counts are
not needed. So is there a more efficient way of finding just unique terms for
a field?
Phil
issue.
On May 21, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> After further investigation I have found that it is not a problem on firefox,
> only chrome and IE.
>
> Phil
>
> -Original Message-
> Sent: 21 May 2012 18:05
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subjec
After further investigation I have found that it is not a problem on firefox,
only chrome and IE.
Phil
-Original Message-
Sent: 21 May 2012 18:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: trunk cloud ui not working
Hi,
I am running from the trunk and the localhost:8983/solr/#/~cloud pa
LogUpdateProcessorFactory(),
new DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory(),
new RunUpdateProcessorFactory()
So just use Log and Run instead to get your old behavior.
- Mark
On Mar 7, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a large index and would like to
Hi,
We have a large index and would like to shard by a particular field value, in
our case surname. This way we can scale out to multiple machines, yet as most
queries filter on surname we can use some application logic to hit just the one
core to get the results we need.
Furthermore as we ant
e.org
Subject: Re: removing cores solrcloud
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I am using the embedded zookeeper server, how would you recommend I connect
> to it so that I can remove the missing core or is it only possible when using
> a stand-alone zooke
zookeepers state too.
I am currently using version 4.0.0.2011.12.12.09.26.56.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 January 2012 16:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: removing cores solrcloud
On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Phil
Hi,
I am running solrcloud and i am able to add cores
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Creating_cores_via_CoreAdmin but how does
one remove cores. If i use the core admin unload command, distributed queries
then error as they still query the removed core. Do I need to update zookeeper
som
Hi,
Is it possible to configure solr using solrcloud and the distribution handler
such that if a new core is added to the master then that core is added and
replicated to the slaves.
Phil
on request specified field.
technically it could? I'm just not sure if the current spellchecking
apis allow for it? But maybe someone has a good idea on how to easily
expose this.
I think its a good idea.
Care to open a JIRA issue?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
Can the DirectSolrSpellChecker be used for autosuggest but defer to request
time the name of the field to use to create the dictionary. That way I don't
have to define spellcheckers specific to each field which for me is not really
possible as the fields I wish to spell check are DynamicFie
You might be able to sort by the map function q=*:*&sort=map(price,0,100,
10) asc, price asc.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 November 2011 13:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sort question
Not that I know of. Yo
* -field:[* TO *]
or
q=*:*&fq=-field:[* TO *]
BTW, the logic of field:yes -field:[* TO *] makes no sense
You're saying "find me all the fields containing the value "yes" and
remove from that set all the fields containing any value at all"....
Best
Erick
On Fri, Nov 25,
Hi,
Is it possible to constrain the results of a query to return docs were a field
contains no value or a particular value?
I tried ?fq=(field:yes OR -field:[* TO *]) but I get no results even though
queries with either ?fq=field:yes or ?fq=-field:[* TO *]) do return results.
Phil
Hi,
When doing a distributed query in solr 4.0 (4.0.0.2011.06.25.15.36.22) with
facet.missing=true and facet.limit=20 I get a NullPointerException. By
increasing the facet limit to 200 or setting facet missing to false it seems to
fix it. The shards both contain the field but one shard always h
[mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 November 2011 15:06
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud with large synonym files
On Nov 2, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running solrcloud and a file in the Dbootstrap_confdir is a large large
> synonym
rflow.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6747664/solr-and-big-synonym-file
Yung-chung Lin
2011/11/2 Phil Hoy
> Hi,
>
> I am running solrcloud and a file in the Dbootstrap_confdir is a large
> large synonym file (~50mb ) used by a SynonymFilterFactory configured in
> the schema.xm
Hi,
I am running solrcloud and a file in the Dbootstrap_confdir is a large large
synonym file (~50mb ) used by a SynonymFilterFactory configured in the
schema.xml. When i start solr I get a zookeeper exception presumably because
the file size is too large.
Caused by: org.apache.zookeeper.Keep
25 matches
Mail list logo
