FunctionQuery of FloatFieldSource (Lucene 5.0)

Hi I am having problems accessing float values in a lucene 5.0 index via the functionquery. My setup is as follows Indexing time -- Document doc = new Document(); FieldType f = new FieldType(); f.setStored(false); f.setNumericType(NumericType.FLOAT); f.setDocValuesType(D

custom search component on solrcloud

Hi I am trying to port my none solrcloud custom search handler to a solrcloud one. I have read the WritingDistibutedSearchComponents wiki page and looked at Terms and Querycomponent codes but the control flow of execution is still fuzzy (even given the “distributed algorithm” description). Co

commons-configuration NoClassDefFoundError: Predicate

Hi I've tried all permutations with no results so I thought I write to the group for help. I am running commons config (http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/) just fine via maven and ant but when I try to run the class calling the method PropertiesConfiguration via a SOLR s

Re: Deleting and committing inside a SearchComponent

On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013, at 03:22 PM, Peyman Faratin wrote: >> Hi >> >> Is it possible to delete and commit updates to an index inside a custom >> SearchComponent? I know I can do it with solrj but due to several

Deleting and committing inside a SearchComponent

Hi Is it possible to delete and commit updates to an index inside a custom SearchComponent? I know I can do it with solrj but due to several business logic requirements I need to build the logic inside the search component. I am using SOLR 4.5.0. thank you

deleting a doc inside a custom UpdateRequestProcessor

Hi I am building a custom UpdateRequestProcessor to intercept any doc heading to the index. Basically what I want to do is to check if the current index has a doc with the same title (i am using IDs as the uniques so I can't use that, and besides the logic of checking is a little more complicat

Re: subindex

an just re-indexing from > scratch. > > Best > Erick > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Peyman Faratin wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Is there a way to build a new (smaller) index from an existing (larger) >> index where the smaller index contains a subset of the fields of the larger >> index? >> >> thank you

subindex

Hi Is there a way to build a new (smaller) index from an existing (larger) index where the smaller index contains a subset of the fields of the larger index? thank you

Re: State sharing

and Solr which could then maintain whatever state it > needs. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Peyman Faratin > Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 12:29 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: State sharing > > Hi > > I ha

State sharing

Hi I have subclassed a SearchComponent (call this class S), and would like to implement the following transaction logic: 1- Client K calls the S's handler 2- S spawns a thread and immediately acks K using rb.rsp.add("status","complete") then terminates public void process (ResponseBuilder rb)

Re: cores sharing an instance

> reason a singleton approach wouldn't work that I > can think of. All the multithreaded caveats apply. > > Best > Erick > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Peyman Faratin wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I have a multicore setup (in 4.3.0). Is it possi

Re: cores sharing an instance

ess you really have no other choice, using singletons is IMHO a bad > idea in this case > > Roman > > On 29 Jun 2013 10:18, "Peyman Faratin" wrote: >> >> its the singleton pattern, where in my case i want an object (which is > RAM expensive) to be a centralized coo

Re: cores sharing an instance

ogging config maybe?). Why are you trying to do this? > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Peyman Faratin > wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have a multicore setup (in 4.3.0). Is it possible for one core to share an >> instance of its class with other cores at run time?

cores sharing an instance

Hi I have a multicore setup (in 4.3.0). Is it possible for one core to share an instance of its class with other cores at run time? i.e. At run time core 1 makes an instance of object O_i core 1 --> object O_i core 2 --- core n then can core K access O_i? I know they can share properties but

Upgrading from 3.6.1 to 4.3.0 and Custom collector

Hi I am migrating from Lucene 3.6.1 to 4.3.0. I am however not sure how to migrate my custom collector below. this page http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/MIGRATE.html gives some hints but the instructions are incomplete and looking at the source examples of custom collectors make me want to

setting bq in searchcomponent

Hi If I run a main query "cheeze" jointly with a boost query "bq=spell:"cheeze" (boosting results with spell field "cheeze"), as /select?fl=title&qf=main&bq=spell:"cheeze"&bq=trans:"cheeze"&q=cheeze everything works fine. And defType=dismax What I'd like to do is to programmatically generate t

faceting and clustering on MLT via stream.body

Hi I would to run a mlt search (in Solrj) of a short piece of text delivered via the stream.body. This part works. What I would like to be able to do is to do 2 things: - faceting on some number (not ALL) of the results - cluster (using carrot2) all of the results Is this possible? I believe f

recommended SSD

Hi Is there a SSD brand and spec that the community recommends for an index of size 56G with mostly reads? We are evaluating this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227706 thank you Peyman

synonym file

Hi I have a (23M) synonym file that takes a long time (3 or so minutes) to load and once included seems to adversely affect the QTime of the application by approximately 4 orders of magnitude. Any advise on how to load faster and lower the QT would be much appreciated. best Peyman

Re: index writer in searchComponent

use solrj api for this purpose? That is, ask via solrj api > 1-2 and perform 3 if entity (assuming you mean document or some field value > by X) didn't exist, i.e. add it to the index. > > // Dmitry > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Peyman Faratin wrote: > >>

Re: index writer in searchComponent

u wanted, > but I'm not sure it's a good idea, are there other processes that will > be writing to the index at the > same time? > > What's the purpose here anyway? There might be a better approach.... > > Best > Erick > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:02

index writer in searchComponent

Hi Is it possible to add a new document to the index in a custom SearchComponent (that also implements a SolrCoreAware)? I can get a reference to the indexReader via the ResponseBuilder parameter of the process() method using rb.req.getSearcher().getReader() But is it possible to actually add

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory with SynonymFilterFactory

thank you Michael. On Jun 16, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Michael Ryan wrote: > Try changing the tokenizer2 SynonymFilterFactory filter to this: > > ignoreCase="false" expand="true" > tokenizerFactory="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> > > By default, it seems that it uses WhitespaceTokenizer. > > -Mich

KeywordTokenizerFactory with SynonymFilterFactory

Hi I have the following 2 field types The problem I am seeing is if I have an entry as this in the "synonyms.txt" file helping h

Kernel methods in SOLR

Hi Has there been any work that tries to integrate Kernel methods [1] with SOLR? I am interested in using kernel methods to solve synonym, hyponym and polysemous (disambiguation) problems which SOLR's Vector space model ("bag of words") does not capture. For example, imagine we have only 3 wo

custom field default qf of requestHandler

Hi I have a problem with the following context. I have a field with a custom type of "shingledcontent", defined as follows in the schema.xml where I then d

query score across ALL docs

Hi What is the best way to retrieve the score of a query across ALL documents in the index? i.e. given: 1) docs, [A,B,C,D,E,...M] of M dimensions 2) Query q searcher outputs (efficiently) 1) the score of q across _all_ M dimensional documents, ordered by index number. i.e score(q) = [A=0

QueryHandler

Hi A noobie question. I am uncertain what is the best way to design for my requirement which the following. I want to allow another client in solrj to query solr with a query that is handled with a custom handler localhost:9090/solr/tokenSearch?tokens{!dismax qf=content}pear,apples,oyster,kin

Re: Faster Solr Indexing

more memory. I'd just take the MaxPermSize > out completely as a start. > > Not sure if you've seen this page, something there might help. > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed > > But throw a profiler at the indexer as a first step, just to see >

Faster Solr Indexing

Hi I am trying to index 12MM docs faster than is currently happening in Solr (using solrj). We have identified solr's add method as the bottleneck (and not commit - which is tuned ok through mergeFactor and maxRamBufferSize and jvm ram). Adding 1000 docs is taking approximately 25 seconds. We