Hi,
Is it possible to highlight int (TrieLongField) or long (TrieLongField)
field in Solr?
--
Paweł
ost part is not removed).
--
Paweł Róg
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Definitely sounds like a bug! File a Jira. Thanks for reporting this. What
> release of Solr?
>
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
> -----Original Message- From: Pawel Rog
> Sent:
Hi,
I use edismax query with q parameter set as below:
q=foo^1.0+AND+bar
For such a query for the same document I see different (lower) scoring
value than for
q=foo+AND+bar
By default boost of term is 1 as far as i know so why the scoring differs?
When I check debugQuery parameter in parsedQue
Hi,
I need QParserPlugin that will use Redis as a backend to prepare filter
queries. There are several data structures available in Redis (hash, set,
etc.). From some reasons I cannot fetch data from redis data structures,
build and send big requests from application. That's why I want to build
tha
)
--
Pawel
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is the whole stack trace: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9056783
>
> --
> Pawel
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> Can you share the full stack trace dump?
&
Hi,
Here is the whole stack trace: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9056783
--
Pawel
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Can you share the full stack trace dump?
>
> - Mark
>
> http://about.me/markrmiller
>
> On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Pawel Rog w
Hi,
I have quite annoying problem with Solr cloud. I have a cluster with 8
shards and with 2 replicas in each. (Solr 4.6.1)
After some time cluster doesn't respond to any update requests. Restarting
the cluster nodes doesn't help.
There are a lot of such stack traces (waiting for very long time):
Maybe try EdgeNgramFilterFactory
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:57 AM, santamaria2 wrote:
> I'm about to implement an autocomplete mechanism for my search box. I've
> read
> about some of the common approaches, b
ok at why.
>
> Note that in particular, using NOW in your filter queries virtually
> guarantees
> that they won't be re-used as per the link I sent yesterday.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> > It can be true that filters cache
NOW in your filter queries, you're probably never
> re-using them anyway, see:
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2012/02/23/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/
>
> I really question whether this limit is reasonable, but you know your
> situation best.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
Thanks for your response
Yes, maybe you are right. I thought that filters can be larger than 3M. All
kinds of filters uses BitSet?
Moreover maxSize of filterCache is set to 16000 in my case. There are
evictions during day traffic
but not during night traffic.
Version of Solr which I use is 3.5
I
If there are only 100'000 documents dump all document ids and make diff
If you're using linux based system you can just use simple tools to do it.
Something like that can be helpful
curl "http://your.hostA:port/solr/index/select?*:*&fl=id&wt=csv"; > /tmp/idsA
curl "http://your.hostB:port/solr/inde
You wrote that you can see such error "OutOfMemoryError". I had such
problems when my caches were to big. It means that there is no more free
memory in JVM and probably full gc starts running. How big is your Java
heap? Maybe cache sizes in yout solr are to big according to your JVM
settings.
--
R
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.ReversedWildcardFilterFactory
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Ishan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to query on solr with * as a first character in query.
> For eg. Content indexed in* "Be careful"
> *and query i want to fire is **ful
>
Thanks a lot, I'll read it :) It seems to be helpfull
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> Is there any possibility to boost
>> terms during indexing? Searching
>> that using google I found information that there is no such
>> feature in
>> Solr (we can only boost fields). Is
Once I had the same problem. I didn't know what's going on. After few
moment of analysis I created completely new index and removed old one
(I hadn't enough time to analyze problem). Problem didn't come back
any more.
--
Regards,
Pawel
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Thomas Dowling wrote:
> In a
built into the system (i.e. indexing, commit and replication)
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>> Hello. I have some problem which i'd like to solve using solr. I have
>> user profile which has some kind of messages in it. Use
Yes it works. Thanks a lot.
But I stil don't understand why in solr 1.4 that option was efficient
but in solr 3.5 not
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>> at
>> org.apache.solr.search.SolrInd
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I tried to use index from 1.4 (load was the same as on index from 3.5)
> : but there was problem with synchronization with master (invalid
> : javabin format)
> : Then I built new index on 3.5 with luceneMatchVersion LUCENE_35
>
> why w
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/838/cpuusage.png/
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I attach chart which presents cpu usage. Solr 3.5 uses almost all cpu
> : (left side of chart).
>
> FWIW: The mailing list software filters out most attachments (there are
> some e
Thread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:582)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> I attach chart which presents cpu usage. Solr 3.5 uses almost all cpu
> (left side of chart).
> at the begining of chart there was about 60rps and about 100rps
> (before turning off solr 3.5). Then there
I attach chart which presents cpu usage. Solr 3.5 uses almost all cpu
(left side of chart).
at the begining of chart there was about 60rps and about 100rps
(before turning off solr 3.5). Then there was 1.4 turned on with
100rps.
--
Pawel
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> *
* 1st question (ls from index directory)
solr 1.4
-rw-r--r-- 1 user user2180582 Nov 30 07:26 _3g1_cf.del
-rw-r--r-- 1 user user 5190652802 Nov 28 17:57 _3g1.fdt
-rw-r--r-- 1 user user 139556724 Nov 28 17:57 _3g1.fdx
-rw-r--r-- 1 user user 4963 Nov 28 17:56 _3g1.fnm
-rw-r--r-- 1 user us
IO waits about 0-2%
Didn't see any suspicious activity in logs, but I can check it again
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Any suspicous activity in the logs? what about disk activity?
>
>
> On 11/29/2011 05:22 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>>
>> On
onfig.xml
> for that URL to work...
> '
>
Will check it :)
>
> : in my last pos i mean
> : default operation AND
> : promoted - int
> : ending - int
> : b_count - int
> : name - text
> : cat1 - int
> : cat2 - int
> :
> : On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:54 PM,
in my last pos i mean
default operation AND
promoted - int
ending - int
b_count - int
name - text
cat1 - int
cat2 - int
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> examples
>
> facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=0&q=nam
examples
facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=0&q=name:(kurtka+skóry+brazowe42)&facet.limit=500&facet.field=cat1&facet.field=cat2&wt=json&rows=50
facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=1350&q=name:naczepa&facet.limit=50
27 matches
Mail list logo
