Re: SolrCloud and grouping

2012-09-10 Thread Pavel Goncharik
Apparently https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2592 will help you out. Unfortunately, it seems that this issue will not be included into Solr 4.0 release. I'm wondering myself if there are any plans to commit and release this issue or an equivalent, to give users control over partititioning

Re: Query-side Join work in distributed Solr?

2012-09-03 Thread Pavel Goncharik
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2066 > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Pavel Goncharik > wrote: >> Do I understand correctly that once >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2592 is resolved, it will >> make both distributed jo

Re: Query-side Join work in distributed Solr?

2012-08-24 Thread Pavel Goncharik
Do I understand correctly that once https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2592 is resolved, it will make both distributed joins and field collapsing work? Best regards, Pavel On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Right, there hasn't been any action on that patch in a whil

Re: Grouping performance problem

2012-07-16 Thread Pavel Goncharik
Hi Agnieszka , if you don't need number of groups, you can try leaving out group.ngroups=true param. In this case Solr apparently skips calculating all groups and delivers results much faster. At least for our application the difference in performance with/without group.ngroups=true is significant