Hi Shay,
I'm not quite sure about this.
But, I think it is get fixed with this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6223
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4186
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4049
Could you try 4.10 from a svn branch and see if your problem is fixed?
I think it is not possible since Jetty is a HTTP server except jetty is
extensible to support other protocol, that is not a derivation of HTTP
(it supports SPDY, WebSocket).
However, what we do, is putting another layer on top of Solr. Our client
does not directly connect to our Solr, but through
OW in your fq clauses, that can
cause grief. See:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/23/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/
This seems like really poor performance, I'm puzzled.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Patanachai Tangchaisin <
patanachai.tangchai...@wizecommerce.com<mailt
y.
Question:
Is there other way to create a fq parameter using 'OR' and make Solr
cache them as a same entry?
Thanks,
Patanachai Tangchaisin
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
==
This email message and any attachments are for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s) and
%29&wt=xml&indent=true&fl=*,score
Now your score is going to be a result of termfreq(product,'spider')
--
Patanachai Tangchaisin
On 07/15/2013 12:01 PM, Tony Mullins wrote:
any help plz !!!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Tony Mullins wrote:
Please any help on h
Hi,
First, which version of Solr are you using?
I also has 60 shards+ on Solr 4.2.1 and it doesn't seems to be a problem
for me.
- Make sure you use POST to send a query to Solr.
- 'connection reset by peer' from client can indicate that there is
something wrong with server e.g. server closes a
