instead of null so we can
> make the defType local param syntax work? I havne't seen it in my
> email but it's really an unrelated problem so it should be tracked
> seperately)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Pascal Dimassimo
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
ave the same
fields than the one where the initial query is made.
I just notice SOLR-2824. So it is really a bug. I'll take the time to look
at the patch attached to this ticket.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Pascal Dimassimo <
pascal.dimass...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Thanks Ho
al param will be checked (just like it can in the BoostQParser)...
>
> qf=text name
> q={!join from=manu_id_s to=id defType=dismax}ipod
>
> Note: even with that hardcoded "lucene" bug, you can still override the
> default by using var dereferencing to point at another
instead of
"lucene". But again, is there a reason why I should not do that?
If it is ok, I could submit a patch.
Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Pascal Dimassimo <
pascal.dimass...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying Solr Join across 2 cores on the
lts. It is doing something according to the
> debug output:
>
>
>
>737
>1593981
>63021
>63021
>63021
> 62351
>63021
>63021
>63021
>63021
>62871
>150
>
d with the documents of index1
by matching the "tag" field.
According to my tests, It looks like the "restaurant" query will always be
parsed using the Lucene QParser. I did not find a way to use another
QParser, like Dismax. Am I right or is there a way?
Thanks!
--
Pascal D
Hi,
hossman wrote:
>
> : We index using 4 processes that read from a queue of documents. Each
> process
> : send one document at a time to the /update handler.
>
> Hmmm.. then you should have a message from the LogUpdateProcessorFactory
> for every individual "add" command that was recieved ..
By 'AutoSuggestion', are you referring to the spellcheck handler?
If so, you have to rebuild your spellcheck index using the 'build' parameter
after you add new data. You can also configure the spellcheck module to
rebuild the index automatically after a commit or an optimize.
http://wiki.apach
Did you try the setting 'onlyMorePopular' ?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.onlyMorePopular
André Maldonado wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm configuring spell checking in my index. Everything is working, but I
> want to get the best suggestion based in number of ocurrence
Hoss,
Thanks for your answers. You are absolutely right, I should have provided
you more details.
We index using 4 processes that read from a queue of documents. Each process
send one document at a time to the /update handler.
Yes, I double checked that no delete occur. Since that indexation,
specific?
Thanks!
ANKITBHATNAGAR wrote:
>
> Try inspecting your index with luke
>
>
> Ankit
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Dimassimo [mailto:thesuper...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:22 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Are you sure that you don't have any java processes that are still running?
Did you change the port or are you still using 8983?
Lee Smith-6 wrote:
>
> Hey All
>
> Trying to dip my feet into multicore and hoping someone can advise why the
> example is not working.
>
> Basically I have been w
Hi,
I have encounter a situation that I can't explain. We are indexing documents
that are often duplicates so we activated deduplication like this:
true
true
signature
title,text
org.apache.solr.update.processor.Lookup3Signature
What I can't explain is that when
Hi,
I want to try KStem. I'm following the instructions on this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem
... but the download link doesn't work.
Is anyone know the new location to download KStem?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/KStem-downl
yes, now it works fine with the trunk sources
thanks!
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> SOLR-973 seems to have caused the problem
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>> do you know if your java file is encoded with utf-8?
>>
>> sometimes it will be encoded as somet
Hi,
I have that problem to. But I notice that it only happens if I send my data
via solrj. If I send it via the solr-ruby gem, everything is fine
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/solr-ruby).
Here is my jruby script:
---
require 'rubygems'
require 'solr'
require 'rexml/do
request.
To circumvent the problem, I implement a custom response writer. This is not
a problem for my project since I have to return a custom format.
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a custom handler that forwards a request to a handler of
> another core. T
Hi,
I'm writing a custom handler that forwards a request to a handler of another
core. The custom handler is defined in "core0" and the core I try to send
the request to is "core2" which has a mlt handler. Here is the code of my
custom handler (extends RequestHandlerBase and implements SolrCoreAw
e:
>
> If you are doing this in a RequestHandler, implement SolrCoreAware and
> you will get a callback with the Core
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#head-8b3ac1fc3584fe1e822924b98af23d72b02ab134
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
&g
ut is it a recommended approach?
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've designed a "front" handler that will send request to other handlers
> and return a aggregated response.
>
> Inside this handler, I call other handlers like this (inside the m
Hi,
I've designed a "front" handler that will send request to other handlers and
return a aggregated response.
Inside this handler, I call other handlers like this (inside the method
handleRequestBody):
SolrCore core = req.getCore();
SolrRequestHandler mlt = core.getRequestHandler("/mlt");
Modi
nding on the headers is described
here: https://developer.mozilla.org/En/HTTP_Caching_FAQ
I realize that this was a Firefox issue. Sorry to have disrupt this list.
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Sorry, the xml of the solrconfig.xml was lost. It is
>
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
&
Sorry, the xml of the solrconfig.xml was lost. It is
Hi guys,
I'm having trouble understanding the behavior of firefox and the etag.
After cleaning the cache, I send this request from firefox:
GET /solr/select/?q=television HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8088
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
Hi guys,
I'm having trouble understanding the behavior of firefox and the etag.
After cleaning the cache, I send this request from firefox:
GET /solr/select/?q=television HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8088
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009011913 F
24 matches
Mail list logo
