). But
overall, it seems like a nice feature to have.
Parvesh Garg,
Head of Engineering
http://www.zettata.com
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Parvesh,
>
> Please see the similar discussion :
> http://search-lucene.com/m/eHNlijx91I7etm1
>
> Ahmet
Thanks Markus. We will look at other options. May I ask what can be the
reasons for not supporting this ever?
Parvesh Garg,
http://www.zettata.com
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello, you can not change similarities per request, and this is likely
> never going
similarity configured and split traffic based on core names. This is
leading to index duplication and un-necessary resource usage.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Parvesh Garg,
http://www.zettata.com
Hi All,
I wanted to understand the difference between CustomScoreQuery and
RankQuery. From the outside, it seems they do the same thing with RankQuery
having more functionality.
Am I missing something?
Parvesh Garg
* retval;
}
Parvesh Garg
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In Solr 5.0+ you can use Lucene's DocValues API to read the indexed
> information. This is a unifying API over field cache and doc values so it
> can be used o
compute a score based on frequency + document
score for each value.
Currently we are using stored fields and was wondering if this approach
would be faster.
Apologies if this is too much to ask for.
Parvesh Garg,
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the pointer. Can you point me to any example implementation.
Parvesh Garg,
Founding Architect
http://www.zettata.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The RankQuery cannot be used as filter. It is designed for custom
> ordering/ranking of r
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the input. We have other requirements regarding precision and
recall, especially when other sorts are specified. So need to suppress docs
based on thresholds.
Parvesh Garg,
Founding Architect
http://www.zettata.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote
=0.2}
Is there a way propagate the suppression of results to FacetsComponent as
well? Can we send the same rq to FacetsComponent ?
Regards,
Parvesh Garg,
http://www.zettata.com
ike I have to write some code for it. Can someone please
point me to the right direction?
- If I have to write a plugin, which files I need to check?
- Which part of the code currently executes the grouping feature? Does
it happen in solr or lucene? Is it SearchHandler?
Parvesh Garg
the schema.
So, the problem of creating compound problems at query time remains.
Parvesh Garg
http://www.zettata.com
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Parvesh Garg wrote:
> Hi Roman, thanks for the link, will go through it.
>
> Erick, will try with expand=true once and check out th
Hi Roman, thanks for the link, will go through it.
Erick, will try with expand=true once and check out the results. Will
update this thread with the findings. I remember we rejected expand=true
because of some weird spaghetti problem. Will check it out again.
Thanks,
Parvesh Garg
http
re-process query myself and
create the compound word. What do you mean by "just query the raw string"?
Am I still missing something?
Parvesh Garg
http://www.zettata.com
(This time I did remove my phone number :) )
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Why did
One more thing, Is there a way to remove my "accidentally sent phone number
in the signature" from the previous mail? aarrrggghhh
y
applied before creating query clauses?
I can keep providing more details as necessary. This mail has already
crossed TL;DR limits for many :)
Parvesh Garg
http://www.zettata.com
+91 963 222 5540
15 matches
Mail list logo
