I thought for completeness I’d try and find which version change caused the
issue and in fact the performance was fine up to and including 4.9.0 and so the
problem seems to have appeared only since the latest version.
N
> On 13 Nov 2014, at 14:46, Neil Ireson wrote:
>
> I fou
1 | 709| 1006| 659|
99856 | 1896| 2214| 719|
499849| 2989| 4863| 1719|
999872| 5552| 8113| 3856|
Therefore I think something has definitely go awry.
N
> On 13 Nov 2014, at 13:49, Neil Ireson wrote:
>
>
Hi all,
I was running an experiment which involved counting terms by day, so I was
using pivot facets to get the counts. However as the number of time and term
values increased the performance got very rubbish. So I knocked up a quick
test, using a collection of 1 million documents with a diffe
Firstly apologies as I originally sent this to the dev list by mistake...
Bit of a weird one and not sure if this counts as a bug.
I erroneously created a filter which correctly filters a term into the index
(e.g. clouds -> cloud), however if that term is filtered again it returns no
value (e.
ld be orthogonal to children, that's confirmed by assert. That's true
> for {!parent} at least.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Neil Ireson wrote:
>
>> Some further odd behaviour. For my index
>>
>> http://localhost:8090/solr/select?q={!child+of=
Some further odd behaviour. For my index
http://localhost:8090/solr/select?q={!child+of=doc_type:parent}*:*
Returns a numFound=“22984”, when there are only 2910 documents in the index
(748 parents, 2162 children).
On 22 Nov 2013, at 12:28, Neil Ireson wrote:
>
> Note sure if thi
Note sure if this is a bug but, for me, it was unexpected behaviour.
http://localhost:8090/solr/select?q={!child+of=doc_type:parent}*:*
returns all the child docs, as expected, however
http://localhost:8090/solr/select?q={!child+of=doc_type:parent}
returns all the parent docs.
This seems wr
In case it is of use, I have just uploaded an updated and mavenised
version of the Luke code to the Luke discussion list, see https://groups.google.com/d/topic/luke-discuss/MNT_teDxVno/discussion
.
It seems to work with the latest (4.0.0 & 4.1-SNAPSHOT) versions of
Lucene.
N
Hi all,
Whilst Solr is a great resource (a big thank you to the developers) it
presents me with a couple of issues.
The need for hierarchical facets I would say is a fairly crucial missing
piece but has already been pointed out
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64).
The other issu
