help.
Thanks and Regards,
Naresh
Please let me know about your conclusion ?
i am also in same confusion.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Dorian Hoxha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that there is a new release on every lucene release. Do you always
> use the latest version since it may have bugs (ex most cassandra
> productions are ol
Sep 8, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Raja Pothuganti <
rpothuga...@competitrack.com> wrote:
> Hi Naresh
>
> 1) For 'sort by' fields, have you considered using DocValue=true for in
> schema definition.
> If you are changing schema definition, you would need redo full reindex
&g
Already tried :
I also tried tweaking Xmx but problem not solved..
I also tried q with criteria of indexed filed with only 4200 hits that also
not working
when sort parameter included.
Please help me here as i am clueless why OOM error in getting 100 documents.
Thanks
Naresh
Requesting Solr experts again to suggest some solutions to my above problem
as i am not able to solve this.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Naresh Yadav wrote:
> Thanks Andrew, You got my problem precisely But solutions you suggested
> may not work for me.
>
> In my API i get
are UUID's, so range query also will not work
as i have no control on order of these ids.
Looking for more suggestions ??
Thanks
Naresh
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Chillrud
wrote:
> Based on his example, it sounds like Naresh not only wants the tags field
> to contain at l
Hi all,
Also asked this here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30166116
For example i have SOLR docs in which tags field is indexed :
Doc1 -> tags:T1 T2
Doc2 -> tags:T1 T3
Doc3 -> tags:T1 T4
Doc4 -> tags:T1 T2 T3
Query1 : get all docs with "tags:T1 AND tags:T3" then it works and will
give
Setup1 i.e 2 minutes.
Actually first 50 thousand request it self is taking about a minute. May be
i would need to see other things as pagination seems working better now.
thanks for giving valuable suggestions.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Naresh Yadav wrote:
> Toke, won't be abl
For
> the next batch, limit it to id > last_id and get the first 50k docs (don't
> use start= for paging). This scales much better when scanning a large
> result set; you'll get constant time across the whole set instead of having
> it increase as you page deeper.
>
> -
ional units in post.
Thanks
Naresh
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> Naresh Yadav [nyadav@gmail.com] wrote:
> > In both setups, we are reading in batches of 50k and each batch taking
> > Setup1 : approx 7 seconds and for completing all batches of total 1
batch size also 10k, 1lakh but no gain in total time taken
in Setup2.
Thanks
Naresh
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Andrew Butkus <
andrew.but...@c6-intelligence.com> wrote:
> &shard.info=true
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 17 Jan 2015, at 04:23, Naresh Yadav wrote
can be possible reasons of degradation of
performance after sharding of index. How can we check where solr server
is taking time to return results.
Thanks
Naresh
ing used all over the place and it is fast. I suggest you looks for
> faceting improvements.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 16, 2015 11:17 AM, Naresh Yadav
> wrote:
> I tried facetting also but not worked smoothly for me. Case i had mentioned
> in email is dummy
path after filter criteria then that is very slow. Because
it is reading whole field from disk and i am only interested in terms.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> Yup terms component does not respect q or fq parameter.
> Luckily, thats eas
e":"1".
That is I need unique terms in "tenant_pool" field for "type":"1" query and
answer will be P1, L1.
Please suggest me if i can get this with out reading each doc from disk.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
Hi ahmet,
If you observe output ngroups is 1 and returning only one group P1.
But my expectation is it should return three groups P1, L1, L2 as my
field is tokenized with space.
Please correct me if wrong?
On 1/15/15, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> Everything looks c
as my problem is changed completely from first post so i had created new
thread for that.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Naresh Yadav wrote:
> just wanted to share schema and results for same :
>
> solr version : 4.6.1
> Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
>
Hi all,
I had done following configuration to test Solr grouping concept.
solr version : 4.6.1 (tried in latest version 4.10.3 also)
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
Solrj code to insert docs :http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124381116
Response Group's : http://www.images
Please help me on this problem where no of groups are not matching with no
of terms which is expected behaviour acc to me.
Please give direction on this problem.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Naresh Yadav wrote:
> I tried what you said also appended group.ngroups=true and got same result
&g
I tried what you said also appended group.ngroups=true and got same result
not expected onengroups coming is 1.
i am on solr-4.6.1 single machine default setup.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Norgorn wrote:
> Can u get raw SOLR response?
>
> For me grouping works exactly the way u expect i
roupValue=L1 Farms, docs=2
My understanding is field is indexed so it will tokenized by space and P1
and L1 will be tokens..Each token should be one group
when we call Group=true in query. Please help me understand this better.
Thanks
Naresh
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
&
mment is, just start by making the field you
> want
> to group on be
> stored="false" indexed="true" type="string"
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Naresh Yadav
> wrote:
> > Hi jack,
> >
> > Thanks for replyi
n Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Naresh Yadav
> wrote:
>
> > *Schema :*
> >
> >
> > *Code :*
> > SolrQuery q = new SolrQuery().setQuery("*:*");
> > q.set(GroupParams.GROUP, true);
> > q.set(GroupParams.GROUP_FIELD, "tenant_pool");
>
:*
groupValue=Farms, docs=2
*Expected Output :*
groupValue=Baroda Farms, docs=1
groupValue=Ketty Farms, docs=1
Please guide me how i can tell solr not to tokenize stored field to decide
unique groups..
I want unique groups as exact value of field not the tokens which solr is
doing
currently.
Thanks
Naresh
I've got this problem that I can't solve. Partly because I can't explain it
with the right terms. I'm new to this so sorry for this clumsy question.
Below you can see an overview of my goal.
I'm using Magento CE1.7.0.2 & Solr 4.6.0.
I'm using Magentix/Solr extension in Magento CE1.7.0.2 its work
age in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/auto-completion-search-with-solr-using-NGrams-in-SOLR-tp3998559p4035931.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards
Naresh
;
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-the-search-results-based-on-number-of-highlights-tp4031175p4034348.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards
Naresh
---
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> >
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-data-from-multiple-tables-into-Solr-tp4032266p4033291.html
> > To unsubscribe from Index data from multiple tables into Solr, click
> here<
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4032266&code=aGFzc2FuY3Jvd2RjYXJlQGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0MDMyMjY2fC00ODMwNzMyOTM=
> >
> > .
> > NAML<
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-data-from-multiple-tables-into-Solr-tp4032266p4033296.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards
Naresh
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-the-search-results-based-on-number-of-highlights-tp4031175p4032452.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards
Naresh
it to the query and
> therefore contribute to the stats...
>
> Can anyone tell me how to get **only** the latest dated document?
>
> PS: the latest date can be Today, yesterday.. anything int eh past.. so
> date based range filter would not help here..
>
> ./zahoor
>
>
--
Regards
Naresh
in *qf*. Is
> this the expected behavior? I don't see it documented. Otherwise, how can I
> set different scores to parameters while keeping an independent *df*? Like
> the following?
>
> f.a.qf=a^3
> f.var.qf=x^2 y^1
> df=var
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
> --
> Juan Miguel Cejuela
>
--
Regards
Naresh
31 matches
Mail list logo
