RE: Strange behavior for certain words

Hi Rama, What field types are these Title and Description? You may go to SOLR admin console and try "Analysis", and select the field type that you have used for Title and Description and provide those words Prepaid and Postpaid in the indexing analyzer and see how is it storing the information.

RE: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

You may create a new field by copying the fields title, category and tag to the new field, like the following: and search against the new field. You may go for newField of type "textgen". Give it a try, Naga From: MitchK [mitc...@web.de] Sent: Tuesda

RE: fmap.content - copying to two fields possible?

I've tried and it is working fine. But, still would like to know whether I can specify two fields against fmap.content. regards, Naga -Original Message- From: Naga Darbha [mailto:ndar...@opentext.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 12:20 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Su

fmap.content - copying to two fields possible?

Hi, I want to copy contents of a file (extracted using "ExtractingRequestHandler") to two fileds A and B. Currently I have configured it with: A If I want to copy the contents of the file to even B field, what is the option? Can I specify two fields against fmap.

phrase search - problem

Hi, I wanted to do phrase search. What are the analyzers that best suited for phrase search. I tried with "textgen", but it did not yield the expected results. I wanted to index: my dear friend If I search for "dear friend", I should get the result and if I search for "friend dear" I shoul

copyField - how does it work?

Hi, I have my config something like "clubbed_text" of type "text" and "clubbed_string" of type "string". : BLOCK-1... BLOCK-2... BLOCK-3... BLOCK-4... Is the copyField valid specified in BLOCK-4? It seems it is not populating the clubbed_string with the values

RE: NOT keyword - doesn't work with dismax?

n't work with dismax? Naga Darbha wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying the NOT clause with dismax query type, and it is not working. It > works with the standard query type. I tried the following query: > > q=NOT+keyword&fq=&qt=dismax&start=0&rows=26&fl=score > &g

NOT keyword - doesn't work with dismax?

Hi, I am trying the NOT clause with dismax query type, and it is not working. It works with the standard query type. I tried the following query: q=NOT+keyword&fq=&qt=dismax&start=0&rows=26&fl=score But, when I replace qt=standard, it works. How to make it work with dismax query type? regar

RE: copyField for dynamicFields

Hi, I think copyField copies the un-processed content (that will be processed by source field) onto the target field and processes it based on target field's type. It is *copied first*. regards, Naga -Original Message- From: Jan Simon Winkelmann [mailto:winkelm...@newsfactory.de] Sen

RE: sorting on text field fails

Thanks Ahmet, I used that approach and it is working well. -Original Message- From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:36 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: sorting on text field fails > I have a field configured as text type (default t

sorting on text field fails

Hi, I have a field configured as text type (default text type - with stemming enabled on both index and query time): When I try to sort on this field, it is throwing the exception: HTTP Status 500 - there are more terms than documents in field "MyTitle", but it's impossible to sort on tokeni

RE: Stemming - disable at query time - reg.

Yes, both have same filters, so we can avoid specifying analyzer type. - Naga -Original Message- From: MitchK [mailto:mitc...@web.de] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:44 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Stemming - disable at query time - reg. Additionally to Alejandro's po

RE: Stemming - disable at query time - reg.

" it is not giving me any results, whereas when I search for "work" it is giving me two results. What should I be doing to get the query results for "working". regards, Naga -Original Message- From: Naga Darbha [mailto:ndar...@opentext.com] Sent: Monday, April 19, 20

RE: Stemming - disable at query time - reg.

Thank you Mitch! I will try that. regards, Naga -Original Message- From: MitchK [mailto:mitc...@web.de] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:35 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Stemming - disable at query time - reg. Naga, 1) Yes, it is possible.

Stemming - disable at query time - reg.

Hi, I have the following filter for a field named "myText" This enables stemming, I guess. My questions are: 1) Can I disable stemming for the same field at the query time? 2) Do I need to copyField the "myText" to "nonStemText", wherein "nonStemText" is not configured with the PorterFilterF