Re: Disk usage per-field

Hi, I am currently benchmarking solr index with different fields to see the impact on its size/ search speed etc. A feature to find the disk usage per field of index would be really handy and save me alot of time. Do we have any updates on this? Has anyone tried writing custom code for it ? -

Re: Searching for words with accented characters.

Hey Robert, Just wondering if you ever got to solve this problem? We are facing a similar issue with our catalog search :( look forward to hearing from you. -Thanks, Muneeb -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-for-words-with-accented-characters-tp4863

Re: improving search response time

Thanks for your input guys. I will surely try these suggestions, in particular, reducing heap size JAVA_OPTION and adjusting cache sizes to see if that makes a difference. I am also considering upgrading RAM for slave nodes, and also looking into moving from SATA enterprise HDD to SSD flash/DRAM

Re: improving search response time

First, thanks very much for a prompt reply. Here is more info: === a) What operating system? Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 b) What Java container (Tomcat/Jetty) Jetty c) What JAVA_OPTIONS? I.e. memory, garbage collection etc. -Xmx9000m -DDEBUG -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dorg.mortbay.

improving search response time

Hi All, I need some guidance over improving search response time for our catalog search. we are using solr 1.4.0 version and have master/slave setup (3 dedicated servers, one being the master and other two slaves). The server specs are as follows: Quad Core 2.5Ghz 1333mhz 12GB Ram 2x250GB disks

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

Where do these lines go in solr config? 5000 1 Thanks, -Mueeb -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p1003903.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

Well I do have disk limitations too, and thats why I think slave nodes died, when replicating data from master node. (as it was just adding on top of existing index files). What do you mean here? Optimizing is too CPU expensive? What I meant by avoid playing around with slave nodes is that doing

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

>> In solrconfig.xml, these two lines control that. Maybe they need to be increased. >> 5000 >> 1 Where do I add those in solrconfig? These lines doesn't seem to be present in the example solrconfig file... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-i

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

Well I do have disk limitations too, and thats why I think slave nodes died, when replicating data from master node. (as it was just adding on top of existing index files). :: What do you mean here? Optimizing is too CPU expensive? What I meant by avoid playing around with slave nodes is that d

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

We have three dedicated servers for solr, two for slaves and one for master, all with linux/debian packages installed. I understand that replication does always copies over the index in an exact form as in master index directory (or it is supposed to do that at least), and if the master index wa

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

No I didn't. I thought you aren't supposed to run optimize on slaves. Well but it doesn;t matter now, as I think its fixed now. I just added a dummy document on master, ran a commit call and then once that executed ran an optimize call. This triggered snapshooter to replicate the index, which some

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

I just checked my config file, and I do have exact same values for deletionPolicy tag, as you attached in your email, so I dont really think it could be this. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996373.html Sent fr

Re: AW: slave index is bigger than master index

Yes I always run an optimize whenever I index on master. In fact I just ran an optimize command an hour ago, but it didn't make any difference. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996364.html Sent from the Solr - Us

slave index is bigger than master index

Hi, I am using Solr 1.4 version, with master-slave setup. We have one master slave and two slave servers. It was all working fine, but lately solr slaves are behaving strange. Particularly during replicating the index, the slave nodes die and always need a restart. Also the index size of slave no

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

Hi Blargy, Nice to hear that I am not alone ;) Well we have been using Hadoop for other data-intensive services, those that can be done in parallel. We have multiple nodes, which are used by Hadoop for all our MapReduce jobs. I personally don't have much experience with its use and hence wouldn