"should" : [ ... ]
>}
> }
> }
>
> But how do I actually go from 'x AND (y OR z)' to 'bool' in the query
> DSL? I seem to lose the nice compositional properties of the expression.
> Here, for example, the expression implies that at least 'y' or 'z' must
> match; I don't quite see how I can express this in the DSL.
>
> Kind regards,
> Mikhail
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
<https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/t495711/facet_Response_1.txt>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
20 at 4:19 PM Jae Joo wrote:
> 8.3.1
>
> required="true" multiValued="false" docValues="true"/>
> required="true" multiValued="false"/>
>
> the field "id" is for nested document.
>
>
>
>
> On M
at
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:257)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:1711)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:255)
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
.2 and I'm looking for an example on how to
> implement it using FunctionScoreQuery.
>
> Do you know if there are examples that explain how to port the code to the
> new implementation?
>
> --
> Vincenzo D'Amore
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
gt; This exception occurs in two places:
>
> 1. LTRScoringQuery. CreateWeight or createWeightsParallel. Here is the
> loading stage, timeout directly end is acceptable.
>
> 2. ModelWeight.scorer. This is a stage that evaluates each Doc and can
> catch the exception, end early, and return part of the result.
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Chris.
I suppose index time analysis can yield these terms:
"paid","ms-reply-unpaid","ms-reply-paid", and thus let you avoid these
expensive wildcard queries. Here's why it's worth to avoid them
https://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/search-like-s
>
> I mean a snippet of configuration shared between update processor factory
> and QParser.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:33 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Hello, Vincenzo.
> > Presumably you can introduce a component which just holds a config data,
> &
I modify the query like this:
>
> {!parent which='class:instruction'}class:observation
>
> It still returns a result for the instruction document, even though the
> document with class instruction does not have any children...
>
> Tor-Magne Stien Hagen
>
> -Original
tern, an approach, a common solution when
> a piece of configuration has to be loaded at boot, or when the core is
> loaded.
> Or when, after an update a new searcher is created and a new query parser
> is created.
>
> Any suggestion is really appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincenzo
>
>
>
> --
> Vincenzo D'Amore
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
f filtering?
> >
> > Tor-Magne Stien Hagen
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mikhail Khludnev
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:01 AM
> > To: solr-user
> > Subject: Re: Unexpected results using Block Join Parent Query Parser
> >
&g
g query:
>
> {!parent which='id:4'}id:3
>
> I expect the result to be empty as document 3 is not a child document of
> document 4.
>
> To reproduce, use the docker container provided here:
> https://github.com/tormsh/Solr-Example
>
> Have I misunderstood something regarding the Block Join Parent Query
> Parser?
>
> Tor-Magne Stien Hagen
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this
> message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages
> resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and
> any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does
> not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted
> therewith.
>
>
>
> Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, French,
> Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
lr core
> is set up as standalone and not in cloud mode.
>
> Best
> David
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ors to=director_id}id:[* TO *]?
>
> Thanks,
> Hari.
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
;:[{
> "match":true,
> "value":58.0,
> "description":"freq, occurrences of term within
> document"},
> {
> "match":true,
> "value&
ecause of synonyms.txt)
>
>
>
> I looked into debug mode but I believe it returns information about the
> ranking calculation.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Serkan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
gt; > -asset_id:doc:en:index.html
> > >
> > > But, it does not work if I use it as a solr query with lucene as
> defType.
> > >
> > > For it to work, I need to convert it like following:
> > > q=+((topics:132)^0.02607211 (topics:146)^0.008187325
>
ery, logs and thead dump (generate
> from Solr Admin while execute query).
> > >
> > > Query :
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bavCqwHfJxoKHFzdOEt-mSG8N0fCHE-w/view
> > >
> > > Logs and Thread dump stack trace
> > > Solr 8.5.1 :
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/149IgaMdLomTjkngKHrwd80OSEa1eJbBF/view
> > > Solr 6.1.0 :
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/13v1u__fM8nHfyvA0Mnj30IhdffW6xhwQ/view
> > >
> > > To analyse further more we found that if we remove grouping field or
> we reduce no. of ids from query it execute fast. Is anything change in
> 8.5.1 version compare to 6.1.0 as in 6.1.0 even for large no. Ids along
> with grouping it works faster?
> > >
> > > Can someone please help to isolate this issue.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jay Harkhani.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
gt; }
>
> in the example, I want to filter type documents where members field has the
> 6 value.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
> function is getting executed inside SOLR, what's the easy to read the other
> documents in SOLR, instead of establishing new connection via solrj and
> read
> it.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
tandard queries or suggesters
> * Queries generate facets but there is no fields with very high number of
> unique values
> * No grouping
> * High usage of function query for relevance computing
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Dominique
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
e cached.
> Thanks,
> Artur Rudenko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:57 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Filtering large amount of values
>
> Hi, Artur.
>
> Please, don't tell me that you obtain doc
after query
> execution?
>
> Note: I got a thread name from log and checked in thread dump on query
> execution time and after query executed. Both time thread stack trace got
> different.
>
> If any other things are required then let me know I will send.
>
> Regards,
&g
t; https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pJBxL0OOwAJSEC5uK_87ikaHEVGdDEEn>
>
> It takes 34 seconds in Solr 8.3.0 or Solr 8.5.1. Same URL takes 1.5
> seconds in Solr 6.1.0.
>
> Is there any changes or issue related to grouping in Solr 8.3.0 or 8.5.1?
>
>
> Regards,
> Vishal Patel
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may not
> use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information
> contained in this message. If you have received this electronic message in
> error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
set. In case of expiration, if omitHeader isn’t set to true the
> response header contains a special flag called partialResults.
> >
> > I do not believe I should be getting an exception.
> >
> > I am load testing so I am intentionally putting pressure on the system.
> >
> > Is this the correct behavior to throw an exception?
> >
> > Regards.
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ndering if it is better to fully qualify a field name or use two
> different fields for performing the "same" search. i.e:
>
>
> {
> type_A_status; Active
> type_A_value: Test
> }
> vs
> {
> type: A
> status: Active
> value: Test
> }
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
gt; > > 34d82ed033cccd8120431b73e93554b85b24a278 - i843100 - 2019-09-30
> > > 14:02:46]
> > >
> > >at
> > > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> > > [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >
> > >at
> > > java.util.concurrent.Fut
1.8.0_211]
>
>at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
> [?:1.8.0_211]
>
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
rror is logged, it will also contain a message
> > >> mentioning which resource ran out.
> > >>
> > >> A common message that might be logged with the OOME is "Unable to
> create
> > >> native thread". This type of error, if that's what's happening,
> > >> actually has nothing at all to do with memory, OOME is just how Java
> > >> happens to report it.
> > >>
> > >> You will need to know exactly which resource is running out before we
> > >> can offer any assistance.
> > >>
> > >> If the OOME is logged, the message you're looking for will be in the
> > >> solr log, not the tiny special log that is created when Solr is killed
> > >> by an OOME. What version of Solr are you running, and what OS is it
> > >> running on?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Shawn
> > >>
> >
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
may sound weird but is there a way I can retain both the
> functionalities?
> No code changes to integration test code and making qt param work again.
>
> Big thanks for any pointers !!
>
> Sincerely,
> Atita
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
limit is -1, which means all bucks, so adding about significant time
> to the overall time just to get number of buckets when we will get all of
> them anyway doesn't seems to be right.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Thanks
> Artur Rudenko
>
>
> This electronic message may contain proprietary and confidential
> information of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. The
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
> entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may not
> use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information
> contained in this message. If you have received this electronic message in
> error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ter name.
>
> So ideally we shouldn't have childfree and blocks together while indexing?
> Or in the whole index they shouldn't be together, i.e. We should have
> atleast one child doc for all if any of doc has one?
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:24 PM Mikhail Khludnev wr
cument
>
> 4
> 4
> Lots of new features
> childDocument
>
>
>
>
>
> Output of block join query after ingesting above docs:
> [image: image.png]
>
> So doc id 5 is getting linked to doc id 1. Is this expected behavior, I
> believ Id-5 should be a different document tree.
>
> Shall I Ingest them in some order ?
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
etrieve scores per user context and query?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ash & Spirit.
> >
>
> --
> **
> ** <https://www.canva.com/>Empowering the world to design
> Also, we're
> hiring. Apply here! <https://about.canva.com/careers/>
>
> <https://twitter.com/canva> <https://facebook.com/canva>
> <https://au.linkedin.com/company/canva> <https://twitter.com/canva>
> <https://facebook.com/canva> <https://au.linkedin.com/company/canva>
> <https://instagram.com/canva>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ap is sparse
> * using some compressed bitmap, e.g. roaring bitmaps
>
> which one is correct? or another answer, thanks you very much!
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
re trying to figure out if using single shard on each
> machine will help.
> Artur Rudenko
> Analytics Developer
> Customer Engagement Solutions, VERINT
> T +972.74.747.2536 | M +972.52.425.4686
>
>
>
> This electronic message may contain proprietary and confidential
> information of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. The
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
> entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may not
> use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information
> contained in this message. If you have received this electronic message in
> error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Previously it died about 800k docs, now we're at 1.2m without any
> slowdown.
>
> Thank you so much
>
> On 06/02/2020, 08:14, "Mikhail Khludnev" wrote:
>
> Hello, Karl.
> Please check these:
>
> https://eur03.safelinks.protec
; Previously it died about 800k docs, now we're at 1.2m without any
> slowdown.
>
> Thank you so much
>
> On 06/02/2020, 08:14, "Mikhail Khludnev" wrote:
>
> Hello, Karl.
> Please check these:
>
> https://eur03.safelinks.pro
n Place, Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England
> No. 9439967). This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> and may be legally privileged, and intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender. This email message has been swept
> for the presence of computer viruses.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
in the codebase
> or which structure is used - I am guessing some array of objects?
>
> Thanks,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On
lting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
nieuprawnione
> wykorzystanie informacji zawartych w tej wiadomości jest zabronione.
>
> *Confidentiality Note:* This message is intended only for the use of the
> named recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or proprietary
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender and delete this message. Any unauthorized use of the information
> contained in this message is prohibited.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
He, Wei.
Feel free to followup https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:14 PM Wei wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail. Do you know of any example on query parser with WAND?
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > If one cr
surprised you're still seeing the issue. If you include the full
> stacktrace and a snippet of code to reproduce, I'm curious to take a look.
>
> That won't help you in the short term though. For that, yes, you'll have
> to use ((Number)count).longValue() in the in
It's time to enforce and document field type constraints
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14230.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:12 PM Doss wrote:
> @ Alessandro Benedetti , Thanks for your input!
>
> @ Mikhail Khludnev , I made docValues="true" for from & to and
)count).longValue() ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 8:53 AM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
>
> I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
>
> https://lucene.472066.n3.
sion for JSON Facets
> requests...any idea why not consistent ?
>
> Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
>
> On Jan 27, 2020 22:13, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hello,
> It might be different between SolrCloud and standalone mode. No data enough
> to make a conclusion.
>
> On Mon,
d this electronic message in
> error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Kumar.
I don't know. 3 / 84 ratio seems reasonable. The only unknown part of the
equation was that {!simpleFilter}. Anyway, profiler/sampler might get exact
answer.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:55 AM kumar gaurav wrote:
> HI Mikhail
>
> Can you please see above debug log and help ?
>
> Than
Never heard of that.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:14 PM Wei wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail. Do you know of any example on query parser with WAND?
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > If one creates query parser wrapping queries with WAND it just prod
odd. Can you try to enable docValues on from side and reindex small
portion of data just to check if it works.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
> Best,
> Wei
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
12 hours interval .
>
> need to use uniqueBlock for json facet for child faceting .
>
> Should i use docValues="true" for _root_ field ?
>
> Thanks .
>
> regards
> Kumar Gaurav
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:28 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
&
gt; Kumar Gaurav
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
$sq}"
> ,
> -
> "{!child of=$pq filters=$fq}docType:(product
> collection)",
> ],
>},
> - type: "terms",
> - field: "price_refin
t;
>,
>- "{!child of=$pq filters=$fq}docType:(product collection)"
>,
>],
> },
> - type: "terms",
> - field: "size_refine",
> - limit: -1,
>
slow . It is taking much time than
> expected .
> Can anyone please check this query specially child.fq and json.facet part .
>
> Please help me in this .
>
> Thanks & regards
> Kumar Gaurav
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
return "this is a test"
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
>
> As a result, I can get any field from collection2 in 'fl'.
>
> Is there any way to get field from collection1 while performing query from
> collection2 joining with collection1?
>
>
> Regards,
> Paresh
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ction
> with a 200 OK after all the documents are uploaded. The connection seems to
> be held open indefinitely. If however, i upload the same file as a CSV,
> then solr does close the http connection. Is this a bug?
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
;
> University Library
> Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
> 755 W. Michigan Street
> Indianapolis, IN 46202
> 317-274-0749
> www.ulib.iupui.edu
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
ease the
> process limit.
>
> As long as you're fiddling with limits, you'll probably also want to
> increase the open file limit.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
an achieve this? JSON faceting with domain filter capability will
> probably solve my problem but I cannot use JSON faceting at this point.
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Srijan Nepal
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
t; >
> > SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
> > query.set("fl", "term");
> > query.set("q", "term~1 term2~2 term3~2");
> > query.set("mm",2);
> >
> > System.out.println(query);
> >
> >
> >
> > And I was unable to find any example that would allow me to do the type
> of
> > query that I am trying to build with only one solr query.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to use the Lucene Query builder with Solr? Is there any
> way
> > to create Boolean queries with Solr? Do I need to build the query as a
> > String? If so , how do I set the mm parameter in a String query?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
esult set closing but then
> data import got really slow and getting stuck without any logs in solr
> logs. I'll debug more from DB perspective, in the meantime any pointers
> would be helpful
>
> On 11/24/19, 3:51 PM, "Mikhail Khludnev" wrote:
>
> Note - T
or iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ____
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2019 2:51:40 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr 4 to Solr7 migration DIH behavior change
>
> Note - This message originated from outside Care.co
by return email and
> delete the message and any attachments from your system.
> >
>
>
> This email is intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may
> contain information that is PRIVILEGED or CONFIDENTIAL. Any unauthorized
> use, distribution, copying, or disclosure by any person other than the
> addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete the
> message and any attachments from your system.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Hello,
You may try to add &shipments.logParamsList=q,row.id and check logs
me.en.html?cmpid=emailsig_link> *·* Blog
> <http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/?cmpid=emailsig_blog> *·* Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/OCLC/20530435726> *·* Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/oclc> *·* YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/OCLCvideo>
>
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
s in Solr 8.3.0 Release Highlights "Fix for SPLITSHARD (async) with
> failures in underlying sub-operations can result in data loss"
>
> Did a fix to SPLITSHARD break BACKUP?
>
> Has anyone been successful running
> solr/admin/collections?action=BACKUP&async=requestname under Solr8.3?
>
> Thanks
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
t;store.pt":"54.6973867999,25.22481530046",
> "store.fl
> ":"*,score", "sort":"score desc", "sfield":"coordinates", "q":"{!join
> from=site_id to=site_id fromIndex=stores score=max}+{!geofilt}
> {!func}g
":"{!edismax
> qf=$hl.fl v=\"iphone xr 64gb\"}", "hl.method":"unified",
> "debugQuery":"on"}},
> "error":{ "metadata":[
> "error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException",
> &quo
>>> > phraseFreq=1.0\n 1.2 = k1, term saturation parameter\n 0.75 = b,
> length
> >>> > normalization parameter\n 4.0 = dl, length of field\n 8.384666 =
> avgdl,
> >>> > average length of field\n", "product:
> >>> > https://ist
ontaining term\n 1500 = N, total number of
> documents with field\n 3.3156862 = idf, computed as log(1 + (N - n + 0.5) /
> (n + 0.5)) from:\n 54 = n, number of documents containing term\n 1500 = N,
> total number of documents with field\n 2.3686793 = idf, computed as log(1 +
> (N - n + 0.5) / (n + 0.5)) from:\n 140
2019 at 11:11 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Is it something like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10673 ?
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:47 PM Vasily Ogar wrote:
>
>> it's show nothing because I got an error
>> "metadata":[ "error-class&
pache.solr.common.SolrException",
> "root-error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException"], "msg":"A
> ValueSource isn't directly available from this field. Instead try a query
> using the distance as the score.",
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2
+{!func}gedist() +{!geofilt sfield=coordinates
> pt=54.6973867999,25.22481530046 d=10}
> sort=score desc
> Thank you
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
duct.hl=on&products.hl.fl=title
> description and like this hl=on&hl.fl=title description and
> hl.products=on&hl.fl.products=title description.
> I don't know what else
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 8:25 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > Have
Hello,
Have you tried to pefix hl.* params with particular subquery name?
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:46 PM Vasily Ogar wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Solr 8.2 and can't find out how to use highlight in the
> subquery. Is it possible at all?
> Thank you
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
h.suggest.analyzing.FreeTextSuggester.lookup(FreeTextSuggester.java:388)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SolrSuggester.getSuggestions(SolrSuggester.java:243)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SuggestComponent.process(SuggestComponent.java:264)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:298)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:199)\n\tat
> org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2566)\n\tat
> org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:756)\n\tat
> org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:542)\n\tat
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
>
> > at
> >
> com.codahale.metrics.InstrumentedExecutorService$InstrumentedRunnable.run(InstrumentedExecutorService.java:181)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.solr.common.util.ExecutorUtil$MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor.lambda$execute$0(ExecutorUtil
> > .java:209)
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> >
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
>
> --
> --
> Regards,
>
> *Paras Lehana* [65871]
> Development Engineer, Auto-Suggest,
> IndiaMART Intermesh Ltd.
>
> 8th Floor, Tower A, Advant-Navis Business Park, Sector 142,
> Noida, UP, IN - 201303
>
> Mob.: +91-9560911996
> Work: 01203916600 | Extn: *8173*
>
> --
> IMPORTANT:
> NEVER share your IndiaMART OTP/ Password with anyone.
>
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
> operation?
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
; --
> with thanks and regards,
> lawrence antony.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
> > the joined collection, I have to update every one of the distributed
> > > > collections.
> > > >
> > > > In standalone mode, I only would have to update the joined
> collection.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if there is a way to overcome this limitation. For example,
> by
> > > > replicating the joined collection to every shard - or other method I
> am
> > > > ignoring.
> > > >
> > > > Any thought ?
> > > > --
> > > > nicolas
> > >
> >
> > --
> > nicolas
> >
>
> --
> nicolas
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
)
>
> 5. Query the document again
> {
> "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"maxScore":1.0,"docs":[
> {
> "id":"a",
> "n_s":"s2",
> "_version_":1647475461695995904}]
> }}
>
> Result: There is no 'pre' field in the document anymore.
>
>
> My thoughts on it:
>
> 1. Data loss can be prevented if the warning will be replaced with error
> (re-throwing exception). Atomic updates for such documents still won't
> work, but updates will be explicitly rejected.
>
> 2. Solr tries to read the document from index, merge it with input document
> and re-index the document, but when it reads indexed pre-analyzed fields
> the format is different, so Solr cannot parse and re-index those fields
> properly.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Oleksandr
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
.\r\n\"^\" ...\r\n ...\r\n
> ...\r\n ...\r\n ...\r\n
>
> ...\r\n ...\r\n\"[\" ...\r\n\"{\" ...\r\n
> ...\r\n\"filter(\" ...\r\n ...\r\n",
> "code":400}}
>
> When using the same query with parenthesis in filter query (fq), I get the
> expected results.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
't be combined?
> They don't look too related to me and I can't seem to find any logical
> reason why they couldn't coexist in the same query.
>
> b.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 1:08 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Hello, Bram.
> >
&g
gt; children is duplicated" error. Is there a way to work around this? Or maybe
> better: is there a way to make the [subquery] transformer behave like (a
> more flexible version of) [child]? Because now, the path information (how
> the children relate to their parent fields) is lost when using [subquery].
>
> Hope to hear more!
>
> b.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
&fq={!join to=...
> from=...}field:(12*) --> works well
>
> Why wild-card query does not work with {!join}?
>
> Regards,
> Paresh
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
't seem to prevent the stats request from blocking other normal
> queries. Is it possible to drop the request before solr executes it? maybe
> at the jetty request filter?
>
> Thanks,
> Wei
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 1:39 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Hello,
ere a way to block certain solr queries based on url pattern? i.e.
> ignore the stats.calcdistinct request in this case.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wei
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
acet" parameter
> (String instead of Map)
>
> Cheers,
> Andrea
>
> On 04/10/2019 22:55, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> > Gosh, obviously. see the clue
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/7d3dcd220f92f25a997cf1559a91b6d9e1b57c6d/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/
rather scary
> and sounds like downtime for a restore is unavoidable.
>
> So, how to properly restore?
>
> Kind regards,
> Koen De Groote
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Pool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)\n\tat
> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)\n",
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2019 2:28 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: json.facet throws ClassCastException
>
> Hello, Webster.
virus transmitted
> therewith. Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the
> German, French, Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
hreadPoolExecutor.lambda$execute$0(ExecutorUtil.java:229)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>
>
>
> Please help me with the issue. Please let me know if you need additional
> details.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
issing only a simple thing here, but can't seem to
> pinpoint it.
>
> Any help?
>
> b.
> <http://www.reinvention.be> *We do video technology*
> Visit our new website! <http://www.reinvention.be> *Bram Biesbrouck*
> bram.biesbro...@reinvention.be
> +32 486 118280 <0032%20486%20118280>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
1 - 100 of 1332 matches
Mail list logo
