Were you having any OOM errors beforehand? If so, that could have caused
some GC of objects that other threads still expect to be reachable, leading
to these null monitors.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM Stephen Lewis Bianamara <
stephen.bianam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi SOLR Community,
>
> I'm i
This looks like a bug that is already fixed but not yet released in 8.9
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SOLR-13034
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 6:27 AM Mohsen Saboorian wrote:
> Any idea about this post?
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/66335803/141438
>
> Regards.
>
Future vulnerability reports should be sent to secur...@apache.org so that
they can be resolved privately.
Thank you
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:17 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recent versions of Solr use 2048.
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch
To expand on what Jason suggested, if the issue is the non-deterministic
ordering due to staggered commits per replica, you may have more
consistency with TLOG replicas rather than the NRT replicas. In this case,
the underlying segment files should be identical and lead to more
predictable results.
Hi Dorion,
We are currently working with our infra team to get these restored. In the
meantime, the 8.4 guide is still available at
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/ and are hopeful that the 8.8
guide will be back up soon. Thank you for your patience.
Mike
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:58 PM
Are you running these in docker containers?
Also, I’m assuming this is a typo but just in case the setting is Xmx :)
Can you share the OOM stack trace? It’s not always running out of memory,
sometimes Java throws OOM for file handles or threads.
Mike
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:00 PM Luke wrote
Can you provide a sample expression that would be able to reproduce this?
Are you able to try a newer version by chance - I know we've fixed a few
NPEs recently, maybe https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14700
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:13 PM ufuk yılmaz
wrote:
> Solr version 8.4. I’m gett
You should be using docvalues on your id, but note that switching this
would require a reindex.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:04 AM Ajay Sharma
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have used cursors to search and export documents in solr according to
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/pagination-of-resu
I believe you may be able to use that command (or some combination of
create alias commands) to create an alias from A to A, and then in
the future when you want to change it you can have Alias A to collection B
(assuming this is the point of the alias in the first place).
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1
I was under the impression that split shard doesn’t work with child
documents, if that is missing from the ref guide we should update it
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 4:30 AM Nussbaum, Ronen
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We're using version 8.6.1 with nested documents.
> I used the SPLITSHARD API and afte
Noggit code was forked into Solr, see SOLR-13427
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/8.6.3/solr/solrj/src/java/org/noggit/ObjectBuilder.java
It looks like that particular method was added in 8.4 via
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13824
Is it possible you're
> jar@jarfx ~/download $ tar xvf solr-8.6.3.tgz
>
> gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
> tar: Child returned status 1
> tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
>
>
> James A. Rome
> 116 Claymore Lane
> Oak Ridge, TN 37830-7674
> 865 482-5643; Cell: 865 566-7991
>
Can you check the signatures to make sure your downloads were not
corrupted? I just checked and was able to download and uncompress both of
them.
Also, depending on your version of tar, you don't want the - for your
flags... tar xf solr-8.6.3.tgz
Mike
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:15 PM James Rome w
Piotr,
Based on the questions that we've seen over the past month on this list,
there are still users with Solr on 6, 7, and 8. I suspect there are still
Solr 5 users out there too, although they don't appear to be asking for
help - likely they are in set it and forget it mode.
Solr 7 may not be
t;,
> "pattern": "(.)\\1+",
> "replacement": "$1"
> }
> ]
> }
> }
> ]
> }
>
> This finds a match...
>
> http:/
I'm looking for a way to transform words with repeated letters into the
same token - does something like this exist out of the box? Do our stemmers
support it?
For example, say I would want all of these terms to return the same search
results:
YES
YESSS
YYYEEESSS
YYEE[...]S
I don't know how
Right now the only solution is to use a shorter term.
In a fuzzy query you could also try using a lower edit distance e.g. term~1
(default is 2), but I’m not sure what the syntax for a spellcheck would be.
Mike
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:59 PM gnandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting following erro
Does it fail similarly on 8.5.0 and .1?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:38 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> There have been some issues with Maven, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170
>
> However, we do not officially support Maven builds, they’re there as a
> convenience, so there may s
Brend,
I appreciate that you are trying to examine this issue from multiple sides
and consider future implications, but I don’t think that is a stirring
argument. By analogy, if we are out of eggs and my wife asks me to go to
the store to get some, refusing to do so on the basis that she might cal
I personally think that using Solr cloud terminology for this would be fine
with leader/follower. The leader is the one that accepts updates, followers
cascade the updates somehow. The presence of ZK or election doesn’t really
change this detail.
However, if folks feel that it’s confusing, then I
Hi Jan,
Can you link to the discussion? I searched the dev list and didn’t see
anything, is it on slack or a jira or somewhere else?
Mike
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:51 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi Kaya,
>
> Thanks for bringing it up. The topic is already being discussed by
> developers, so expect
26 May 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.5.2 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.5.2
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted sea
Did you have SSL enabled with 8.2.1?
The error looks common to certificate handling and not specific to Solr.
I would verify that you have no extra characters in your certificate file
(including line endings) and that the keystore type that you specified
matches the file you are presenting (JKS o
We could theoretically include this in a 8.5.2 version which should be
released soon. The change looks minimally risky to backport?
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Check Jenkins:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Lucene/job/Solr-Artifacts-8.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifa
mmed...
>
> Best,
> Audrey
>
> On 4/30/20, 6:37 PM, "Jhonny Lopez"
> wrote:
>
> Yes, sounds like worth it.
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Drob
> Sent: jueves, 30 de abril de 2020 5:30 p. m.
>
5:37 PM Jhonny Lopez
wrote:
> Yes, sounds like worth it.
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Mike Drob
> Sent: jueves, 30 de abril de 2020 5:30 p. m.
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Possible issue with Stemming and nouns ended with
Is this worth filing a bug/suggestion to the folks over at snowballstem.org?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:08 PM Audrey Lorberfeld -
audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com wrote:
> I agree with Erick. I think that's just how the cookie crumbles when
> stemming. If you have some time on your hands, you can integr
Pradeep,
First, some background on fuzzy term expansions:
1) A query for foobar~2 is really a query for (foobar OR foobar~1 OR
foobar~2)
2) Fuzzy term expansion will only take the first 50 terms found in the
index and drop the rest.
For implementation notes, see this comment -
https://github.com
Hi Searchers!
I was recently looking at some of the start-up logic for Solr and was
interested in cleaning it up a little bit. However, I'm not sure how common
certain deployment scenarios are. Specifically is anybody doing the
following combination:
* Using SolrCloud (i.e. state stored in zookee
Erick,
Can you drop a link to that Jira here after you create it?
Many thanks,
Mike
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:05 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I just read that page over and it looks way out of date. I’ll raise
> a JIRA.
>
> > On Feb 14, 2020, at 2:55 PM, Walter Underwood
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah,
On 2019/05/08 16:52:52, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/8/2019 10:50 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> > Solr Experts,
> >
> > Is there an existing API to modify just part of my configset, for example
> > synonyms or stopwords? I see that there is the schema API, but that is
&
Solr Experts,
Is there an existing API to modify just part of my configset, for example
synonyms or stopwords? I see that there is the schema API, but that is
pretty specific in scope.
Not sure if I should be looking at configset API to upload a zip with a
single file, or if there are more granul
Given that the already public nature of the disclosure, does it make sense
to make the work being done public prior to release as well?
Normally security fixes are kept private while the vulnerabilities are
private, but that's not the case here...
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Shalin Shekhar M
When you specify the zk string for a solr instance, you typically include a
chroot in it. I think the default is /solr, but it doesn't have to be, so
you should be able to run with -z zk1:2181/sorl-dev and /solr-prod
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/setting-up-an-external-zookeeper-ensembl
> I have no idea whether you can successfully recover anything from that
> index now that it has broken the hard limit.
Theoretically, I think it's possible with some very surgical edits.
However, I've tried to do this in the past and abandoned it. The code to
split the index needs to be able to o
The two collection approach with aliasing is a good approach.
You can also use the backup and restore APIs -
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/making-and-restoring-backups.html
Mike
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm moving to Solr Cloud 6.x and I se
+solr-user
Might get a different audience on this list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
Date: Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:43 AM
Subject: (how) do folks use the Cloud Graph (Radial) in the Solr Admin UI?
To: d...@lucene.apache.org
Any thoughts o
To throw out one possibility, a read only file systems has no (low?)
possibility of corruption. If you have a static index then you shouldn't
need to be doing any recovery. Would still need to run ZK with RW
filesystem, but mybe Solr could work?
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Erick Erickson
Isn't this exactly what Apache Nutch was built for?
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM, David Choi wrote:
> In any case after digging further I have found where it checks for
> robots.txt. Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:34 PM Walter Underwood
> wrote:
>
> > Which was exactly what I suggested.
You're committing too frequently, so you have new searchers getting queued
up before the previous ones have been processed.
You have several options on how to deal with this. Can increase commit
interval, add hardware, or reduce query warming.
I don't know if uncommenting that section will help b
> The searching install will be able to rebuild itself from the data
storage install when that
is required.
Is this a use case for CDCR?
Mike
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/9/2017 12:58 AM, Bharath Kumar wrote:
> > Thanks Hrishikesh and Dave. We use SOLR cloud with
o we point them to different log directories/config?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 30 April 2017 at 00:36, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> > Are you running both Solr instances in the same hardware and pointing
> them
> > at the same log directories/config?
> >
> &g
Are you running both Solr instances in the same hardware and pointing them
at the same log directories/config?
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017, 2:56 AM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Solr 6.4.2 on SolrCloud, and I'm running 2 replica of Solr.
>
> When I start the replica, I will encounter t
Are the clients that are posting updates requesting commits?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Summer Shire wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Can someone help me understand the following behavior.
> I have the following maxTimes on hard and soft commits
>
> yet I see a lot of Opening Searchers in the log
> org
I'm doing some debugging work on a solr core, and would find it useful to
be able to pretty print the contents of the segments_N file in the index.
Is there already good functionality for this, or will I need to write up my
own utility using SegmentInfos?
Thanks,
Mike
What do the various Java IDEs use for indexing classes for
field/type/variable/method usage search? I imagine it's got to be bytecode.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Tomasz Borek wrote:
> Out of curiosity: why bytecode?
>
> pozdrawiam,
> LAFK
>
> 2015-05-08 21:31 GMT+02:00 Mark :
>
> > I lookin
ApacheCon is starting tomorrow, so seeing if I pulling up this thread
yields any new replies this time. I'm hanging out in Austin, looking
forward to some good conversations and sessions!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:14 PM, CP Mishra wrote:
> Dmitry, that would be great.
>
> CP
>
> On Thu, Feb 12,
Probably a historical artifact.
cz is the country code for the Czech Republic, cs is the language code for
Czech. Once, cs was also the country code for Czechosolvakia, leading some
folks to accidentally conflate the two.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Eduard Moraru
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of
The SVN source is under tags, not branches.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_10_3/
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:39 PM, O. Olson wrote:
> Thank you Hrishikesh. Funny how GitHub is not mentioned on
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/resources.html
>
> I think common-build.
Umang,
I believe this mailing list strips images. You might have better luck
uploading your image to a 3rd party hosting site and providing a link.
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Umang Agrawal wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could you please suggest how to exclude selected filter from solr sear
gt; Thanks,
> Nishanth
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> > Are we sure this isn't SOLR-6931?
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Nishanth S
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > We are
Are we sure this isn't SOLR-6931?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Nishanth S
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are running solr cloud 4.4 with 30 shards and 3 replicas with real time
> indexing on rhel 6.5.The indexing rate is 3K Tps now.We are running into an
> issue with replicas going into recover
52 matches
Mail list logo
