Re: 1.4 Replication

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Gregg
Bug filed. Thankyou. On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 22:40 +0530, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Gregg wrote: > > > That is disappointing then. Restricting by IP may be doable, but much > > more work than basic auth. > > > > >

Re: 1.4 Replication

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Gregg
That is disappointing then. Restricting by IP may be doable, but much more work than basic auth. On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:41 +0530, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: > replication has no builtin security > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Matthew Gregg > wrote: >

Re: 1.4 Replication

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Gregg
which i feel may not need to be protected > > The other API's methods can have security . say dnappull, diableSnapPoll etc > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Matthew Gregg > wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:06 +0530, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: &g

Re: 1.4 Replication

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Gregg
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:06 +0530, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Matthew Gregg > wrote: > > Does replication in 1.4 support passing credentials/basic auth? If not > > what is the best option to protect replication? > do you me

1.4 Replication

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Gregg
Does replication in 1.4 support passing credentials/basic auth? If not what is the best option to protect replication?