Hi Jason,
You can use boost functions in the dismax handler to do this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#bf_.28Boost_Functions.29
Mat
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:28, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I use the dismax query to search across several fields.
>
> I find I have a lot of
Hi all,
I can't seem to find a way to query for an empty string that is
simpler than this:
field_name:[* to ""]
Things that don't work:
field_name:""
field_name["" TO ""]
Is the one I'm using the simplest option? If so, is there a particular
reason the other ones I mention don't work? Just cur
Cool, thanks - just wanted to make sure I'm not insane. Makes sense
that there would be a difference if the index is built fresh in that
case.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:59, Mark Miller wrote:
> Mat Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Trying to debug a very sneaky bug in a s
g it, but I was surprised to find out that
the deleteByQuery() query is what makes the difference between passing
and failing.
Any insight much appreciated!
Mat Brown
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 19:46, Sachin Sebastian
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to migrate from solr 1.3 to solr 1.4 and I've few issues.
> Initially my localsolr was throwing NullPointer exception and I fixed it by
> changing type of lat and lng to 'tdouble'. But now I'm not able to updat
You could easily have a scheduled job that ran delete by query to
remove posts older than a certain date...
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 13:00, Matthieu Labour
wrote:
> HiIs there a way for solr or lucene to expire documents based on a field in a
> document. Let's say that I have a createTime field w
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 15:41, gdeconto wrote:
>
>
> Xavier Schepler wrote:
>>
>> for example, "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users
>> using this feature.
>>
>
> I've done tests with many hundred dynamically created fields (ie foo_1 thru
> f_400). generally speaking, I have
as thinking of something that would add all the ms together and report it
> in the "completed at" line so you can get a higher level view of which
> requests take the time and where.
>
> Ian.
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Mat Brown wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 11,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 13:07, Ian Connor wrote:
> The idea is that in the log is currently like:
>
> Completed in 1290ms (View: 152, DB: 75) | 200 OK [
> http://localhost:3000/search?q=nik+gene+cluster&view=2]
>
> I want to extend it to also track the Solr query times and time spent in
> solr-rub
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 19:15, Mark Miller wrote:
> Mat Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Wondering if anyone can point me at a simple way to specify basic
>> logging options (log level, log file location) when starting the Solr
>> example jar from the command line
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone can point me at a simple way to specify basic
logging options (log level, log file location) when starting the Solr
example jar from the command line.
As a bit of background, I maintain a Ruby library for Solr called
Sunspot that ships with a Solr installation for ease
ven more capable. See
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch for more details.
>
> Cheers,
> Grant
>
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Mat Brown wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working on a small Solr plugin to expose the basic
>> funct
Hi all,
I've been working on a small Solr plugin to expose the basic
functionality of lucene-spatial as unobtrusively as possible. I've got
a basic implementation up and passing tests, and I was hoping to get
some feedback on it. Though I've coded against Lucene for a production
app in the past, t
Hi all,
Is there a standard way to automatically update the values returned by
the methods in SolrInfoMBean? Particularly those concerning revision
control etc. I'm assuming folks don't just update that by hand every
commit...
Thanks!
Mat
Hi all,
Just wondering if it's possible to do filter exclusion (i.e.,
multiselect faceting) on query facets in Solr 1.4?
Thanks!
Mat
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out which query parser handles nested queries
(the kind documented here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/31/nested-queries-in-solr/).
When working with Solr 1.3 stable, I'm able to use this syntax
effectively using the default requestHandler, but when I am
:*' though - thanks.
Mat
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:12, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Mat Brown wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Shalin. The "*:*" sounds good - so that'll definitely have no
>> effect on query performance?
>>
>
x27;d particularly like to put into the :q
parameter.
Mat
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:00, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Mat Brown wrote:
>
>>
>> If I have a set of filter queries that I'd like to apply but nothing
>> that I particularl
Hi all,
If I have a set of filter queries that I'd like to apply but nothing
that I particularly would like to put into the :q parameter (since I'd
like all of the scopes to be cached), is there any problem with just
passing "[* TO *]" for the :q param? Any performance implications?
Thanks!
Mat
Hi all,
I just tried installing LocalSolr and LocalLucene - both the v2.0 tags
- in my Solr 1.3 instance, but when I start up I'm getting a
NoClassDefFoundError for
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchComponent. Grepping through
the source it appears that that class does exist in Solr 1.3, so
Hi all,
If I have two fields that are copied into a copyField, and I index
data in these fields using different index-time boosts, are those
boosts propagated into the copyField?
Thanks!
Mat
Assuming the date is 2009-01-01 00:00:00 UTC...
Before: my_date:[* TO 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z]
After: my_date:[2009-01-01T00:00:00Z TO *]
Between: my_date:[2009-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z]
All: my_date:[* TO *] (or just don't put a date at all)
Mat
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:27, chem l
Neil - when started using the packaged start.jar, Solr runs in the
foreground; that's why you can't type anything in the command line after
starting it.
Mat
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 15:55, Mukerjee, Neiloy (Neil) <
neil.muker...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> After that comes up in the command line,
23 matches
Mail list logo
