parsed to
«-ToChildBlockJoinQuery (+enum_attr_2021:[2730 TO 2730])»
1. SOLR-9327 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9327> describes
similar behaviour for graph queries.
--
Kind regards,
Marvin B. Lillehaug
:object
> &fq=+start_date:[0 TO 20200611] +(end_date:{20200611 TO *] (*:*
> -end_date:[* TO *])
where all fields but start_date and end_date having doc values.
So I guess we'll just have to adjust our rate limiter so that Solr is not
overwhelmed.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 8:21 PM Marvi
give the JVM
> running Solr less heap and the problem wouldn’t manifest.
> I haven’t seen it with 8.5.2. Just a thought.
>
> > On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:27 AM, Marvin Bredal Lillehaug <
> marvin.lilleh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there are light/moderate indexing
lting in CALL_DEPTH having a value larger than 0
when the next Core is created.
Maybe MDCLoggingContext.reset() should be used instead
of MDCLoggingContext.clear() for a 8.5.x fix?
The workaround to set a larger value of coreLoadThreads does work.
--
Kind regards,
Marvin B. Lillehaug
> One possibility is merging index segments. When this happens, are you
> actively indexing? And are these NRT replicas or TLOG/PULL? If the latter,
> are your TLOG leaders on the affected machines?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Jun 3, 2020, at 3:57 AM, Marvin Bredal Lillehaug <
.cloud.RecoveryStrategy.doRecovery(RecoveryStrategy.java:337)
> org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy.run(RecoveryStrategy.java:318)
But not sure if this is from the incident or just right after. It seems
strange that a fsync should behave like this.
Swappiness is set to default for RHEL 7 (Ops have resisted turning it off)
--
Kind regards,
Marvin B. Lillehaug
also be
appreciated.
--
Kind regards,
Marvin B. Lillehaug
for Solr 7 in CHANGES.txt
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Marvin Bredal Lillehaug <
> marvin.lilleh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank your for your reply.
> > I will take a look at both the code for bootstrapping, and look at what
> you
> > are suggesting
Thank your for your reply.
I will take a look at both the code for bootstrapping, and look at what you
are suggesting to determine what to do.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/24/2018 8:05 AM, Marvin Bredal Lillehaug wrote:
>
>> This is for doing local dev
, solrhome is copied to the right place and the
instance is started.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/24/2018 3:13 AM, Marvin Bredal Lillehaug wrote:
>
>> We have a multicore Solr-instance that currently is running version 6.6.2.
>> For local development w
(1) is there something I can do to fix things or (2) is there a
problem in the solr / zookeeper code or (3) are the problems somewhere in
zkCredentialsProvider or zkACLProvider (where I can't fix a thing)?
Thanks
Marvin the paranoid
Hi there!
I cannot read timestamp data from QueryResponse (want to cast result to a
POJO). If Im using SolrDocumentList there are no errors.
db-data-config.xml:
Following entity defintion:
Thanks for the response!
Its a bad news that it isnt that simple I hoped.
Certainly I need names and a timestamp for the comment. There are any
problems if I want to add a timestamp in the one long string? Apart from
this can I add this one long string to the index?
Example:
table blog: id, autho
Hi there!
I have 2 tables 'blog' and 'comment'. A blog can contains n comments (blog
--1:n-- comment). Up to date I use following select to insert the data into
solr index:
The index result looks like:
1
12
blog of t
y and avoid the
> mailing list?
Send plain text email instead of HTML. That solves the problem 99% of the
time.
Marvin Humphrey
_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
> > ) [BODY]
This issue often crops up at Apache. Sending your messages as plain text
rather than HTML resolves it 99% of the time.
Marvin Humphrey
which almost always resolves the problem. (HTML mail boosts spam
score compared to text mail).
Marvin Humphrey
uses that could possibly explain your results; and things you
thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they
worked - to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated."
Marvin Humphrey
rds in common" is presumably non-trivial.
If you can either find or write open source software that pulls off
such "astonishingly intelligent" matches despite the many challenges,
kudos. I'd love to see it.
Cheers,
Marvin Humphrey
Rectangular Research
http://www.rectangular.com/
don't know the
original term, only the content of the document, how do you know
whether you should look for docs near "lsa" or "eswar"?
Marvin Humphrey
Rectangular Research
http://www.rectangular.com/
21 matches
Mail list logo
