Comparing indexed joins on multiple core or on the same core...
Which one would be faster?
I am guessing doing it on multiple cores would be faster, as the index on
each core would be smaller... Any thoughts on that?
[]s
Socratees,
You wrote: "Or, What if you can facet by the field, and group by the field
count, then *apply facet filtering to exclude all filters with count less
than 5?*"
That's exactly what I want, I just couldn't figure how to do it! Any idea
how could I write this query?
Best regards,
Marcelo.
Upayavira,
First of all, thanks for the answers.
We have considerer the possibily of doing several queries, however in
hour case we want a count to show to the user (should take less than 2
seconds) and we could have millions of rows (being million of queries) to
get this count.
Isn't
Ssami,
I work with Matheus and I am helping him to take a look at this
problem. We took a look at result grouping, thinking it could help us, but
it has two drawbacks:
- We cannot have multivalued fields, if I understood it correctly. But
ok, we could manage that...
- Suppose some qu
well as the full document. And, there is no
> > way to address or synchronize individual elements of multivalued fields.
> >
> > Joins are great... if used in moderation. Heavy use of joins is not a
> > great idea.
> >
> > -- Jack Krupansky
> >
>
rd");
doc2.addField("acessory2", "Mouse");
doc2.addField("root_id", "room2");
solr.add(doc2);
doc2 = new SolrInputDocument();
doc2.addField("id", "computer6");
doc2.addField("acessory1", "Monitor");
doc2.addField("acessory2", "Tablet");
doc2.addField("root_id", "room2");
solr.add(doc2);
UpdateResponse response = solr.add(doc);
if (response.getStatus() != 0)
throw new DGIndexException("Could not insert document to solr!");
solr.commit();
}
Best regards,
--
Marcelo Elias Del Valle
http://mvalle.com - @mvallebr
f used in moderation. Heavy use of joins is not a
> great idea.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:37 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: amount of values in a multi value field - is
ossible in an extreme case like
this? Would you share my thoughts if I said denormalization is not always
the right option?
Best regards,
--
Marcelo Elias Del Valle
http://mvalle.com - @mvallebr
Got puzzled now! If instead of AND I use &, it works:
fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg & {!join from=root_id to=id}type:arm
I am definitly missing something, I don't know what... Shouldn't both be
the same?
[]s
2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> Dominique,
guess in your sample &attr1 applies to
> the body, not the legs, that could explain your problem
>
>
> 2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle
>
> > This
> > fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg&attr1=right OR {!join
> from=root_id
> > to=id}type:arm&attr1
lleux
> try fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg&attr1=right OR {!join
> from=root_id to=id}type:arm&attr1=left
>
> Dom
>
>
> 2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am playing with joins here just to test what I can do wi
= *:*
- fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:arm&attr1=left
To select the body based on the right leg:
- q = *:*
- fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg&attr1=right
But what if I need both left arm AND right leg? Should I do 2 joins?
Best regards,
--
Marcelo Elias Del Va
Worked :D
Thanks a lot!
2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> root_id is a dynamic field... But should the type of the field change
> according to the values? Because using the same configuration but using
> "room1" as value, it works.
>
> Let me c
te
a fixed field root_id and check if it works...
Thanks for the hint!
2013/7/10 Erick Erickson
> What kind of field is root_id? If it's tokenized or not the
> same type as id, that could account for it.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Marcelo
1:Teclado");
QueryResponse response = DGSolrServer.get().query(query);
long numFound = response.getResults().getNumFound();
it returns zero results. However, if I use "room1" for first
document's id and for root_id field on second document, it works.
Any idea why? What am I missing?
Best regards,
--
Marcelo Elias Del Valle
http://mvalle.com - @mvallebr
t inside this:
> http://code4lib.org/files/2ndOrderOperatorsv2.pdf
>
> roman
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am using Solr Cloud today and I have the following need:
> >
> >- My queri
enormalize data in this case. Is the join
my best option here?
Best regards,
--
Marcelo Elias Del Valle
http://mvalle.com - @mvallebr
t "going wild"
> with dynamic fields, it is common that they start "going wild" with their
> names as well, using spaces, colons, slashes, etc. that cannot be parsed in
> the "fl" and "qf" parameters, for example. Please don't go there!
>
>
Hello everyone,
I am trying to search information about possible solr limitations I
should consider in my architecture. Things like max number of dynamic
fields, max number o documents in SolrCloud, etc.
Does anyone know where I can find this info?
Best regards,
--
Marcelo Elias Del
Hello all,
I am facing a problem on how to structure Sol cluster and indexes.
Current problem:
We developed an DMP (Data Management Platform) for online advertisement
purposes... and we are currently using Solr in order to index all the data
we collect and provide "ultra-fast user segmentation"
at building a topic map
> of all your resources.
>
> Jack
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> wrote:
> > Hello David,
> >
> > First of all, thanks for answering!
> >
> > 2013/2/21 David Quarterman
> >
>
Hello David,
First of all, thanks for answering!
2013/2/21 David Quarterman
> Looked through your site and the framework looks very powerful as an
> aggregator. We do a lot of data aggregation from many different sources in
> many different formats (XML, JSON, text, CSV, etc) using RDBMS a
Hello Alexandre,
2013/2/20 Alexandre Rafalovitch
> How does this compare to Pentaho Kettle? http://kettle.pentaho.com/
>
> I am not terribly familiar with this space, so - if the question is stupid,
> feel free to address it appropriately. :-)
Don't worry, it's not stupid. I will make my best
Hello James,
First of all, thanks for your feedback. I will try to clarify some
questions bellow.
2013/2/20 Dyer, James
> I only looked at your link super fast, but this seems like a very viable
> alternative to Solr's DIH. DIH does the job fairly well but we've
> struggled to have develo
Hello All,
I’m sending this email because I think it may be interesting for Solr
users, as this project have a strong usage of Solr platform.
We are strongly considering opening the source of our DMP (Data Management
Platform), if it proves to be technically interesting to other developers /
comp
This is gold info for me! Thanks!
2012/10/24 Martin Koch
> In my experience, about as fast as you can push the new data :) Depending
> on the size of your records, this should be a matter of seconds.
>
> /Martin Koch
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Marcelo Elias D
r/vendor you indexed and false (or just left out) for all the
> rest and q=blahblah&fq=cust_filter:true.
>
> Hope that helps
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am new to Solr and I have a scenario
frequency I
update vendors, but have vendor + customers in a single document would obly
me to do the full update.
Does anyone have a good solution for this I am not being able to see? I
might be missing some basic concept here...
Thanks,
--
Marcelo Elias Del Valle
http://mvalle.com - @mvallebr
write another
email with my current doubts, but I think I understood the joins now, they
just were not what I was expecting. Maybe I am misunderstanding some
concepts...
Best regards,
Marcelo.
2012/10/24 Marcelo Elias Del Valle
> Shawn,
>
> First of all, thanks a lot for your a
eady installed in solr 4?
Sorry for the amount of questions. ;-)
Thanks,
Marcelo Valle.
2012/10/24 Shawn Heisey
> On 10/24/2012 8:05 AM, Marcelo Elias Del Valle wrote:
>
>> I saw there is some documentation in solr wiki for SearchHandler and
>> VelocityResponseWri
30 matches
Mail list logo
