Hi,
I'm using SolrJ along with EmbeddedServer component in a Tomcat server.
I was wondering why Tomcat couldn't be gracefully shut down and
discovered it was a Solr issue.
When Tomcat is stopped I do call the shutdown methods of both
CoreContainer and EmbeddedSolrServer instances.
But this didn't
computer short_title:computer
> seems like what you're asking for.
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer.
>> Let's say I have to fields : 'keywords' and 'short_title'
d into a single facet? What that means practically is not at
> all obvious from your problem statement.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to make a faceted search using two fields. I w
Hi,
I'd like to make a faceted search using two fields. I want to have a
single result and not a result by field (like when using
facet.field=f1,facet.field=f2).
I don't want to use a copy field either because I want it to be
dynamic at search time.
As far as I know this is not possible for Solr 3
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your answers.
Sorry I typed it wrong, it was :
q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=foo&facet.field=lom.classification.ddc.id
which caused an error.
That's said I added echoParms to the request and only got :
lom.classification.ddc.id
So multivalued URL params are not taken in a
Hi,
I'm quite sure I'm missing something but I'm getting mad with this problem :
If I put : q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=lom.classification.ddc.id
=> I have results for facet fields
If I put : q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=lom.educational.context
=> I have results for facet fields
But if I put :
> filter) on that field instead.
> >
> > If there were a way to do it the way you're asking (there might be, I
> don't know), there's no guarantee that the total of 23 is correct. If
> there's overlap ie a document having both product and tag values of
> &
Hello,
I have two fields 'product' and 'tag'.
Executing this query q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=product&facet.field=tag
gives me this result :
16
...
7
...
Is there a way to group the results by value ie getting 23, regardless of the field names?
Thanks in adva
Hi,
What about using the delta-import command of the DIH?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Using_delta-import_command
If you want two have 2 separated indexes, you could play with the "swap"
command.
One index would be continuously updated and the other one used for the user
requests
e..
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using edismax and Solr 4.0 and I'd like to add fuzzy parameters for
> > some fields like this :
> >
> > my_field1~2 my_field2 my_f
Hi,
Maybe you could have a look at this :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#tie_.28Tie_breaker.29
Marc.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:48 PM, John wrote:
> I have a complex edismax query:
>
>
> facet=true&facet.mincount=0&qf=title^0.08+categorysearch^0.05+abstract^0.03+body^0.1&wt=java
Hello,
I'm using edismax and Solr 4.0 and I'd like to add fuzzy parameters for
some fields like this :
my_field1~2 my_field2 my_field3
Unfortunately It doesn't work, so I tried following approaches :
1) /select?q=my_search_string~2 => of course it applies to *all* fields of
my edismax query, an
Hello,
You could create an other field and link to it the synonym analyzer. When
querying set a lower boost for this field.
Marc.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Robert Brown wrote:
> is it possible to lower the score for synonym matches?
>
> we setup...
>
> admin => administration
>
> but if
Hi Marco,
Great! Maybe you can add it on the Solr wiki? (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr).
Regards,
Marc.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 05:40 PM, Marco Martinez wrote:
>
>> For anyone interested, recently I've been using a new Solr client fo
Hello,
To crawl the document you can use Apache Tika before sending the content to
Solr (via Solrj).
Regards,
Marc.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : I want to index some document with solrj API's but the URL of theses
> : documents is FTP,
> : How to set username an
Hi,
It depends what you want to test. If you want to check that your fields
behave like they should (for example make sure that the content of a field
containing accents can be retrieved) they you can write unit tests using a
Solr client API like solrj. You insert sample data and then you
programma
Yes that's it if you add twice the same document (ie with the same id) it
will replace it.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> A followup. The wiki has a whole discussion of the 'update' XML
> message. But solrj has nothing like it. Does that really exist? Is
> there a reas
Hello,
Pierre, can you tell us where you read that?
"I've read here that optimization is not always a requirement to have an
efficient index, due to some low level changes in lucene 3.xx"
Marc.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Pierre GOSSE wrote:
> Solr will response for search during optimizat
Hi,
I saw this in the Solr wiki : "An un-optimized index is going to be *at
least* 10% slower for un-cached queries."
Is this still true? I read somewhere that recent versions of Lucene where
less sensitive to un-ptimized indexed than is the past...
Having 50 000 new (or updated) documents coming
Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wrote my own SearchHandler and therefore overrided the handleRequestBody
> method.
> This method takes two input parameters : SolrQueryRequest and
> SolrQueryResponse objects.
> The thing I'd like to do is t
Hi,
Using Solr 3.1 I'm getting errors when trying to sort on fields containing
dashes in the name...
So that's true stay away from dashes if you can.
Marc.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I'd stay away from dashes too. It's too easy for the query parsers
> to mistake the
Hi all,
I wrote my own SearchHandler and therefore overrided the handleRequestBody
method.
This method takes two input parameters : SolrQueryRequest and
SolrQueryResponse objects.
The thing I'd like to do is to get the query fields that are used in my
request.
Of course I can use req.getParams().g
self with normal XML parsing techniques.
>
> At least that's my understanding...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I defined fields in my schema.xml using the boost attribute.
> > Now I
Hi,
What is the error exactly? Did you look at the logs?
Regards,
Marc.
2011/5/17
> Dear all,
>
> I have a problem about using solrj.
> From Solrj I learned that following code would delete all indexes from solr
> and it really did.
>
> SolrServer server = getSolrServer();
> UpdateRe
Hi,
I defined fields in my schema.xml using the boost attribute.
Now I'm using Solrj to index my documents so after having created a
SolrInputDocument I use the addField method.
A boost parameter can be provided.
But how can I read the boost value I defined in schema.xml for that field so
that I c
Hi,
I have to index records that have fields containing date.
This date can be : "2011", "2011-05", "2015-05-01". Trailing characters also
can be slashes.
I'd like to convert theses values into a valid date for Solr.
So my question is : what is the best way to achieve this?
1) Use solr.DateField
esponseBody));
>
>} catch (Exception e) {
> e.printStackTrace();
> } finally {
> // Release the connection.
> method.releaseConnection();
>}
> }
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering how to find out which version of Solr is currently running
> > using the Solrj library?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marc.
> >
>
Hi,
I'm wondering how to find out which version of Solr is currently running
using the Solrj library?
Thanks,
Marc.
Ok that's perfectly clear.
Thanks a lot for all your answers!
Marc.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
> > Hi Erick,
> >
> > Thanks for your answer.
> > I'm a quite newbie to S
to be aware of.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
> wrote:
> > Hi Péter,
> >
> > I'm not sure to understand your answer. A SolrInputDocument always
> contains
> > only stored fields, so I don't see th
Hi Ahmet,
That did it, thanks a lot!
Marc.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > Is there a fastest way to do that? I mean transforming a
> > SolrDocument into a
> > SolrInputDocument?
>
> Does these static methods help?
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toS
it is working from the original
> source, because it is possible, that not all fields are stores, and
> the original content of the not stored fields is not inside the Solr
> document.
>
> Péter
>
> 2011/3/21 Marc SCHNEIDER :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd l
Hello,
I'd like to know the fastest way (code lines) to update a field of a
document.
So my idea was:
1) Get a SolrDocument
2) Add all fields of the SolrDocument to a new SolrInputDocument
3) Update the field in SolrInputDocument
4) Add SolrInputDocument to the server and commit it
Is there a fas
Hi,
Could you please post exactly what you tried?
Regards,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ken Foskey wrote:
>
> I have read the various pages and used Curl a lot but i cannot figure out
> the correct command line to add a document to the example Solr instance.
>
> I have tried a few things h
how that works out. I
> guess, if we have to run queries across the cores, I may have to just
> run separate queries.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc SCHNEIDER [mailto:marc.schneide...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 8:01 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.
Hi,
It depends on what kind of data you are indexing between your multiple
applications.
If app1 has many fields to be indexed and app2 too and if theses fields are
differents then it would probably be better to have multi cores.
If you have a lot of common fields between app1 and app2 then one in
Ok I found the solution:
First of all schema is an attribute of the core tag so it becomes:
Also make sure the conf directory in your classpath or relative to the path
from where you are launching solr.
It is NOT relative to solr.xml path.
Marc.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Marc SCHNEIDER
Hi,
I'm using Solr 1.4.1 and trying to share a schema among two cores.
Here is what I did :
solr.xml :
conf/schema.xml
conf/schema.xml
Then in my solr.home (where solr.xml lives) I created a conf directory and
put schema.x
38 matches
Mail list logo