Yes, we tried that and it worked. We removed only for query analyzer and it
is working properly now.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:24 AM Dominique Bejean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you try to remove the RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter ?
>
> Dominique
>
> Le mar. 8 sept. 2020 à 13:52, Ma
Hi,
We are using the following configuration:
--
*Schema: *
*Managed Synonyms:* "abc implement", "bike", "xyz traders", "xyz transpo
Dear Friend,
We are organizing a workshop on Big Data. Here are details regarding the
same.
Please forward it to your company HR and also your friends and let me know
if anyone is interested. We have early bird offer if registration is done
before 31st May 2012.
Big Data is one space that is buzz
Our data comes from file system and from web and so adding the
auto-increment field at the datasource is not possible.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/5/2012 1:53 AM, Manish Bafna wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>> Is it possible to define a field as "Co
unique IDs is likely to cause problems, so choose
> one.
>
> 2. If you must have two IDs, use one table in a lightweight relational
> database to store the relationships between the md5 value and the serial
> number.
>
> wunder
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:37 PM, Manish
a field
again.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Why?
>
> When you reindex, is it OK if they all change?
>
> If you reindex one document, is it OK if it gets a new sequential number?
>
> wunder
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Manish Bafna wro
We already have a unique key (We use md5 value).
We need another id (sequential numbers).
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : We need to have a document id available for every document (Per core).
>
> : We can pass docid as one of the parameter for fq, and it will return
We need to have a document id available for every document (Per core).
There is DocID in Lucene Index but did not find any API to expose it using
Solr.
May be if we can alter Solr to optionally return the DocId (which is
unique),
We can pass docid as one of the parameter for fq, and it will retur
>
> Hi,
> Is it possible to define a field as "Counter Column" which can be
> auto-incremented.
>
> Thanks,
> Manish.
>
Can you send the schema you are using?
Looks like you are using WhiteSpace / StandardAnalyzer for the tag field.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Christopher Gross wrote:
> My index has a multi-valued String field called "tag" that is used to
> store a category/keyword for the item the record is
the remaining as "Others".
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Manish Bafna
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Is it possible to get top 10 facets and group the remaining in "Others".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Manish.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dmitry Kan
Hi,
Is it possible to get top 10 facets and group the remaining in "Others".
Thanks,
Manish.
Windows.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Vadim Kisselmann
wrote:
> 2011/9/28 Manish Bafna
>
>> >>Will it not merge the index?
>>
>
> yes
>
>
>> >>While merging on windows, the old index files dont get deleted.
>> >>(Windows has an is
Sep 28, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Vadim Kisselmann <
>> v.kisselm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > why should the optimization reduce the number of files?
>> > It happens only when you indexing docs with same unique key.
>> >
>> > Have you differences in
Try to do optimize twice.
The 2nd one will be quick and will delete lot of files.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Kissue Kissue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 3.3. I noticed that after indexing about 700, 000 records
> and running optimization at the end, i still have about 91 files in my ind
Number of cache is definitely going to reduce heap usage.
Can you run those xlsx file separately with Tika and see if you are getting
OOM issue.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:09 PM, abhijit bashetti wrote:
> I am facing the OOM issue.
>
> OTHER than increasing the RAM , Can we chnage some other par
What is single document has multiple languages?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Everybody else use dedicated field per language, so why can't you?
> Please explain your use case, and perhaps we can better help understand
> what you're trying to do.
> Do you always kn
iginal query.
>
> Regards
> Ericz
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Manish Bafna >wrote:
>
> > fq -> filter query parameter searches within the results.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Grobler > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Solr expe
fq -> filter query parameter searches within the results.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
> Hi Solr experts,
>
> If you have a site with products sorted by submission date, the product of
> a
> customer might be on page 1 on the first day, and then move down to page x
> as ot
Are you using Tika to do the extraction of content?
You might be getting OOM because of huge xlsx file.
Try having bigger RAM and you might not get the issue.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:44 PM, abhijit bashetti <
abhijitbashe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the OOM error.
>
> I am wor
Which is preferable? using TermsComponent or Facets for autosuggest?
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent states that TermsComponent
> will
> : return frequencies from deleted documents too.
> :
> : Is there anyway to omit the de
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent states that TermsComponent will
return frequencies from deleted documents too.
Is there anyway to omit the deleted documents to get the frequencies.
I know there is a facets which can be used. Is it recommended to use facets
for autosuggest feature?
Use replication
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Michael Szalay
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We have a setup with two cores, a "current" and a "work". The current is
> used
> by the application and the work is used by the updating program.
>
> I'm implementing a partial index updater. To do that, I want t
We too were getting same issue.
We solved it by ensuring that when commit is in progress, no one access the
index.
Though SOLR's UpdateRequest does it, we will still read timeout issues
because of CommonsHttpSolrServer.
If we have another layer which doesnt send the request itself, then you wont
Check out Physcial memory/virtual memory usage.
RAM usage might be less but Physical memory usage goes up as you index more
documents.
It might be because of MMapDirectory which used MappedByteBuffer.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:09 AM, alexander
25 matches
Mail list logo
