RE: Override wt parameter

Anyother ideas to resolve this issue would be really helpful. Thanks Kalyan Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message- From: Manepalli, Kalyan [mailto:kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 9:30 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Override wt

Re: Override wt parameter

I tried using invariants wt=xml, but it doesn¹t work. Is anyone tried playing around with SolrCore.java changes? On 12/28/12 7:17 PM, "Shawn Heisey" wrote: >On 12/28/2012 6:07 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote: >> Kalyan >> >> I didn't test that .. but perhaps it may work out for you -- specifying >>"inv

Re: Override wt parameter

Shawn Heisey" wrote: >On 12/28/2012 3:19 PM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am in process of upgrading SOLR from 1.4 to 3.6. The clients and the >>server communicate using SOLRJ. Since SOLRJ uses javabin as response >>format, I want to change this to xml duri

Override wt parameter

Hi all, I am in process of upgrading SOLR from 1.4 to 3.6. The clients and the server communicate using SOLRJ. Since SOLRJ uses javabin as response format, I want to change this to xml during the upgrade procees. Since there are multiple clients, I tried modifying the SOLR server to hardcore wt

RE: Solr upgrade from 1.4 to 3.6

Kalyan, that is becouse SolrJ uses "javabin" as format which has class version numbers in the serialized objects that do not match. Set the format to XML ("wt" parameter) and it will work (maybe JSON would, as well). Chantal Am 31.07.2012 um 20:50 schrieb Manepall

Solr upgrade from 1.4 to 3.6

Hi all, We are trying to upgrade our solr instance from 1.4 to 3.6. We use SolrJ API to fetch the data from index. We see that SolrJ 3.6 version is not compatible with index generated with 1.4. Is this known issue and is there a workaround for this. Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli

Solr Hangs up after couple of hours

Hi all, I am facing a peculiar problem with Solr querying. During our indexing process we analyze the existing index. For this we query the index. We found that the solr server just hangs on a arbitrary query. If we access the admin/stats.jsp, it again resumes executing the queries. The t

RE: Querying throws java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck

Yonik, One more update on this. I used the filter query that was throwing error and used it to delete a subset of results. After that the queries started working correctly. Which indicates that the particular docId was present in the index somewhere, but lucene was not able to find it.

RE: Querying throws java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck

10 at 12:30 AM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > Hi, >   I am stuck at this weird problem during querying. While querying the solr > index I am getting the following error. > Index: 52, Size: 16 java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 52, Size: 16 > at java.util.ArrayList.RangeChec

Querying throws java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck

Hi, I am stuck at this weird problem during querying. While querying the solr index I am getting the following error. Index: 52, Size: 16 java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 52, Size: 16 at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547) at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:32

RE: Question about updateRequestProcessorChain

wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Manepalli, Kalyan < > kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >>               I am trying to use updateRequestProcessorChain in Solr1.3. >> >> I co

Question about updateRequestProcessorChain

Hi All, I am trying to use updateRequestProcessorChain in Solr1.3. I configured the requestProcessor Chain like this: And Use it in Requesthandler like this custom The problem I am facing is, even if I use regular requestHandler "

Filtering / sorting results based on results from different core

Hello, In our current setup we have 2 cores. First core contains hotel content information and second core contains pricing information. I was looking for a way to combine this information at query time so that I can filter / sort results by price. Is there any way to do this. An exam

RE: how to scan dynamic field without specifying each field in query

You can copy the dynamic fields value into a different field and query on that field. Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message- From: gdeconto [mailto:gerald.deco...@topproducer.com] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:06 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: how to scan dynam

RE: Solr 1.3 and JDK1.6

We have been using solr 1.3 with jdk1.6 for quite sometime in production, no issues yet Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message- From: vaibhav joshi [mailto:callvaib...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:21 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr 1.3 and JDK1.6

RE: facet performance tips

Jerome, Yes you need to increase the filterCache size to something close to unique number of facet elements. But also consider the RAM required to accommodate the increase. I did see a significant performance gain by increasing the filterCache size Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Origina

RE: Solr MultiCore query

The default the schema has all the fields as string without any tokenizers. So all the queries will have to be case sensitive. For example, the below query would give results. http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:8983/solr/core1&q=iPo* Take a look

RE: Tips on speeding the indexing process

: Manepalli, Kalyan [mailto:kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 3:41 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Tips on speeding the indexing process Regarding the analysis, we do couple of things during indexing. First is use a dictionary text file for stopword filter factory

RE: Tips on speeding the indexing process

analysis is going on and size of docs. 32 threads seems too high, unless your Solr server really has 32 cores. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: "Manepalli, Kalyan" > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"

RE: Tips on speeding the indexing process

ively, start multiple indexing threads (match the number of Solr server CPU cores) and index from there. Send batches of docs, not one by one. Don't commit or optimize until you are done. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > Fro

Tips on speeding the indexing process

Hi, I have a very generic question regarding indexing. In my current app, I have about 450,000 docs each doc size around 2k. The total indexing time is around 2hrs. Now due to multi language support, the number of documents is increasing to 2.0 million. The total indexing time is exc

RE: How do I set up an embedded server with version 1.3.0 ?

Hi Ian, I use the embeddedSolrServer from a Solr Component. The code for invoking the embeddedSolrServer looks like this SolrServer locServer = new EmbeddedSolrServer(SolrCore.getCoreDescriptor() .getCoreContainer(), "locationCore"); Where locationCore is the core name in

RE: FilterCache issue

@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: FilterCache issue Its the facet.method param: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#head-7574cb658563f6de3ad54cd99a793cd73d593caa -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > Mark, > Where do we specify the

RE: FilterCache issue

the FieldCache method? Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Manepalli, > Kalyan wrote: > >> The fields are defined as single valued and they are non tokenized for. >> I am using solr 1.3 waiting for release of solr 1.4. >> > > Then the filterCache

RE: FilterCache issue

: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: FilterCache issue On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > I am faceting on the single values only. You may have only added a single value to each field, but is the field defined to be single valued or multi valued? Also, what vers

RE: FilterCache issue

I am faceting on the single values only. I ran load test against solr app and found that under increased load the faceting just gets slower and slower. That is why I wanted to investigate filtercache and any other features to tweak the performance. As suggested by Mark in the earlier email, I in

RE: FilterCache issue

t the size in kb/mb. Try raising it - perhaps a lot ;) But consider that you have to have the RAM to accommodate as well ... What version of Solr are you using? -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > Hi, > I am seeing an issue with the filtercache

FilterCache issue

Hi, I am seeing an issue with the filtercache setting on my solr app which is causing slower faceting. Here is the configuration. Statistics: description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512, autowarmCount=256, regenerator=org.apache.solr.search.solrindexsearche...@8d41f2) stat

RE: Fetching Dynamic Fields

Dynamic Fields Hope this helps - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#head-db2785986af2355759faaaca53dc8fd0b012d1ab Cheers Avlesh On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Manepalli, Kalyan < kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com> wrote: > Hi all, >Is there a way to select all

Fetching Dynamic Fields

Hi all, Is there a way to select all the dynamic fields in the fl field without using *. Here is what I am looking for. Fields in the schema, locationName_*, locationId,description,content. I want to select just the locationName_* and locationId. How can I do this without using fl=*,

RE: Customizing results

ay have > >> > >> fl.alias=location_da_dk:location > >> > >> --Noble > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Otis Gospodnetic > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Aha, so you

RE: Customizing results

field (and any other fields you want returned). So if the language/locale is de_de, then make sure the request has fl=location_de_de,another_field,another_field, and not, for example location_it_it Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message ---- > F

Customizing results

Hi, I am trying to customize the response that I receive from Solr. In the index I have multiple fields that contain the same data in different language. At the query time client specifies the language. Based on this param, I want to return the value, copied into a different field. E

RE: Unable to Search German text

I found what I was doing wrong. The XML document that I was posting didn't have the char encoding info, due to which the solr was ignoring the special chars. Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message- From: Manepalli, Kalyan [mailto:kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com] Sent: Monday, Ju

Unable to Search German text

Hi All, I am facing an issue while adding multi language support in the Solr. Here is what I am doing. 1) have a field of type text_de which has analyzer as snowballporterFilterFactory with German2 as language 2) copy the german locationName into this field at the index ti

RE: large index vs multicore

e client-side or inside Solr, before returning the results ? I was wondering what relevancy, sorting, etc. would become. -- Nicolas > > Otis -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > - Original Message >> From: "Manepalli, Kalyan"

RE: Multi-index Design

That's how we do it in Orbitz. We use "type" field to separate content, review and promotional information in one single index. And then we use the last-components to plugin these data together. Only thing that we haven't yet tested is the scalability of this model, since our data is small. Th

Jira issue Solr-948

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone had used the new helper methods in SolrPluginutils added as part of Solr-948. I tried the same implementation with Solr 1.3 and everything works correctly, but for one issue. In the response XML, the nu

RE: large index vs multicore

Thanks for the reply. Yes in most of the usecase the data would be from both the indices. It's like a parent child relation. The usecase requires the data from the child be displayed along with parent product information. Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley

large index vs multicore

Hi All, In my project, I have one primary core containing all the basic information for a product. Now I need to add additional information which will be searched and displayed in conjunction with the product results. My question is - From design and query speed point of - should I ad

Spellcheck for phrase queries

Hi, I am trying to implement a spell check functionality on a particular field. I need to do a complete phrase spell check when user enters multiple words. For eg: If the user enters "great Hyat" the current implementation would suggest "great Hyatt", just correcting the word "hyat

RE: Filtering on blank fields

20-Nov-08, at 12:23 PM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > Hi, > >I want to fetch only the documents which have a certain > field. > > For this I am using a fq query like this > > fq=rev.comments:[* TO *] > > > > rev.comments fields is of type string. >

Filtering on blank fields

Hi, I want to fetch only the documents which have a certain field. For this I am using a fq query like this fq=rev.comments:[* TO *] rev.comments fields is of type string. The functionality works correctly but I am seeing a performance degradation Without the above fq, the QTim

RE: Synonyms impacting the performance

PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:09 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Synonyms impacting the performance On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > I did the index time synonyms and results do look much better > than the query time indexing. > But

RE: Synonyms impacting the performance

Hi Erik, I did the index time synonyms and results do look much better than the query time indexing. But is there a reason for the searches to be that slow. I understand that we have a pretty long list of synonyms (one word contains atleast 20 words as synonyms). Does this have such an adv

RE: Synonyms impacting the performance

improbable Review:incredible )| name:amaz | (description:amaz description:fabul description:improbable description:incredible ) There are around 20 synonyms for each word. I am not sure if 20 keywords are causing the latency. Thanks, Kalyan Manepalli -Original Message----- From: Manepalli, Kalyan [mai

RE: Synonyms impacting the performance

From: "Manepalli, Kalyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:58:37 AM Subject: Synonyms impacting the performance Hi all, I recently implemented query time synonyms in my application and I am seeing drastic performa

Synonyms impacting the performance

Hi all, I recently implemented query time synonyms in my application and I am seeing drastic performance degradation. The synonyms file is counts around 1000 words. The average querytime without synonyms is around 125 ms and with synonyms it jumps to 20 secs. Am I missing something

Solr Autowarming

Hi all, I am working on smartfill solution using Solr. For increasing the speed, I want to warm the cache at startup, using large number of queries. Is it possible to use a custom class to fire these queries instead of listing the queries in solrConfig Any suggestions will be help

RE: customizing results in StandardQueryHandler

tance calculation to each matched document. On Oct 24, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > Ryan, > Actually, what I need is: I always query for a set of fields say > (f1, f2, f3 .. f6). Now once I get the results, based on some logic, I > need to generate the XML which i

RE: customizing results in StandardQueryHandler

ct 24, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Manepalli, Kalyan wrote: > Hi, > In my usecase, I query a set of fields. Then based on the > results, I want to output a customized set of fields. Can I do this > without using a search component? > E:g. I query for fields f1, f2, f3, f4. Now based on so

customizing results in StandardQueryHandler

Hi, In my usecase, I query a set of fields. Then based on the results, I want to output a customized set of fields. Can I do this without using a search component? E:g. I query for fields f1, f2, f3, f4. Now based on some conditions, I want to output just f1, f3, f4 (the list of final field

Boosting Question

Hi, I am working on a usecase where I want to boost a document if there are certain group of words near the keywords searched by the user. For eg: if the user is searching for keyword "pool", I want to boost the documents which have words like "excellent pool", "nice pool", "awesome pool",

Luke not working with Solr 1.3 index

Hi All, I am getting an CorruptIndexException while trying to open Solr 1.3 generated index using Luke. The Index as is working fine with. I am using luke - 0.8.1 version. Any Idea if anyone has encountered this issue Thanks Kalyan