Congratulations Jan
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 8:07 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Congratulations!
> Karl
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 6:28 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> Congrats Jan!
>>
>>
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
&
will behave with
two/multiple leaders since the Zk-clients embedded inside SolrClient?
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918
positional context of the user in case of Multi token keywords you can also
bigrams/trigrams to generate edge n-grams.
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Fri, 24 Jan, 2020, 8:28 pm Lucky Sharma, wrote:
> Hi Audrey,
> As suggested by Erik, you can index the data into a seperate collection
> and You ca
Hi Audrey,
As suggested by Erik, you can index the data into a seperate collection and
You can instead of adding weights inthe document you can also use LTR with
in Solr to rerank on the features.
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Fri, 24 Jan, 2020, 8:01 pm Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
e the link mentioned below to review:
https://github.com/MighTguY/solr-extensions
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Thu, 23 Jan, 2020, 8:58 pm Alessandro Benedetti,
wrote:
> Edward is correct, furthermore using a stemmer in an analysis chain that
> don't tokenise is going to work just for single
+1 for Mee too, I guess there are some API calls,
PS: looking Into the same
On Wed, 2 Oct, 2019, 9:17 pm Mel Mason, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else experiencing problems using the admin interface on
> Chrome? It's been working for us for years, but suddenly this last week
> it's started freezi
eason would be Lucene doc
ID. I have also observed the same thing in Solr 7.6.0, and my reason for
that was, docID for the same doc could be different in both the nodes. so
for making the same record order what you can do is, add "id desc" as very
last stage of sorting
Regards,
Lucky
ttp://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200911.mbox/%3c2613171a0911021121u10aae54bud436b452e3934...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918
Thanks, David, Shawn, Jagdish
Help and suggestions are really appreciated.
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:50 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 6/26/2019 12:56 PM, Lucky Sharma wrote:
> > @Shawn: Sorry I forgot to mention the corpus size: the corpus size is
> >
Thanks, Jagdish
But what if we need to perform search and filtering on those 1.5k doc
ids results, also for URI error, we can go with the POST approach,
and what if the data is not sharded.
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:28 AM jai dutt wrote:
>
> 1. No Solr is not
@Shawn: Sorry I forgot to mention the corpus size: the corpus size is
around 3 million docs, where we need to query for 1500 docs and run
aggregations, sorting, search on them.
@David: But will that not be a performance hit (resource incentive)?
since it will have that many terms to search upon, t
e for such kind of problem?
2. Since we will be passing 1500 unique document ids, As per my
understanding it will impact query tree as it will grow bigger. Will
there be any other impacts?
3. Is it wise to use or solve the situation in this way?
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
.
Regarding the terms query : is there any max number of ids which we can
pass as a filter. Also sincethere could be large set will that not impact
the query tree. ??
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Fri, 21 Jun, 2019, 1:36 AM Mikhail Khludnev, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 5:47 PM Lucky Sharma wr
possible of
solving this problem.
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No: +91 9821559918
Hi all,
While creating an update request to solr, Its recommended creating
batch request instead of small updates. What is the optimum batch
size? Is there any number or any computation which can help us to
assist on the same.
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918
Any suggestions? what am I missing?
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918
3, 2018 at 5:13 PM Lucky Sharma wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Thanks, Mikhail.
> > But what about the suggestions for v6.6+?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lucky Sharma
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> >
Hi,
Thanks, Mikhail.
But what about the suggestions for v6.6+?
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This might be improved in 8.0
> see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:39 PM L
ld you not write your processing code in that
> > middle-ware layer?
> >
> > Regards,
> >Alex.
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 06:43, Lucky Sharma wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi have one scenario,
> > > where I need to make a sequential call to the solr. B
gives the final response as output.
Is this the correct approach?
The only assumption I am making here is that both the cores are
locally available.
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No: +91 9821559918
to
write our own UpdateProcessor to handle block updates. if we don't
want to send the complete block in the request.
If yes what happens during a race condition.
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918
of it as decorators operating over streams of
> data.
>
>
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:26 AM Lucky Sharma wrote:
>
> > Hi Prakhar,
> > Thanks for the reply, But What I am actually curious to kno
little helpful
>
> https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2/getting-started-with-streaming-expressions-in-apache-solr-b49111a417e3
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Prakhar
>
>
>
> From: Lucky Sharma<mailto:goku0...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 1
Hi I have some doubt regarding how the streaming expressions and
parallel SQL queries are evaluated in SOLR, I tried to dig deep in the
code but wasn't able to find much, A little help will be much
appreciated
--
Warm Regards,
Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918
24 matches
Mail list logo
