t faster CPU or simplify your queries/configuration in
> some way. Adding more replicas should improve your query throughput, but
> only if you add them in more HW, not the same one.
>
> ...anyway, just a theory
>
> Tomás
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Shawn Heisey wrot
cache utilization of 20GB and core
utilization of 100% (all 8 cores)
so it seems that the bottleneck are cores and not RAM. I don't expect a
performance improvement increasing RAM. Am I wrong?
Thanks,
Luca
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/8/2016 7:55 AM, Luca Quarello
e times in Scenario1 and better response times for
configuration2 in Scenario2.
Is it correct?
Thanks,
Luca
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Luca Quarello
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
> I used solr5.3.1 and I sincerely expected response times with replica
> configuration near to response ti
> > Well with 2 replicas all docs have to be deparately indexed in 2 places
> and
> > solr has to confirm that both indexing went well.
> > Indexing times are lower on a solrcloud collection with 2 shards (just
> one
> > replica, the leader, per shard) because docs are i
hat both indexing went well.
> > Indexing times are lower on a solrcloud collection with 2 shards (just
> one
> > replica, the leader, per shard) because docs are indexed just once and
> the
> > load is spread on 2 servers instead of one
> >
> > 2015-12-30 2:03 GMT+0
Hi,
I have an 260M documents index (90GB) with this structure:
where the fragmetnt field contains XML messagges.
There is a search function that provide the messagges satisfying a search
criterion.
TARGET:
To find the best c
gt;
> What are you using to write your client?
>
> Best,
>
> GW
>
>
>
> On 27 December 2015 at 19:35, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> > On 12/26/2015 11:21 AM, Luca Quarello wrote:
> > > I have a SOLR 5.3.1 CLOUD with two nodes and 8 shards per node.
> &g
r_cloud mode does the shards splitting action work properly for large
shards?
Thanks!
*Luca Quarello*
M:+39 347 018 3855
luca.quare...@xeffe.it
*X**EFFE * s.r.l
C.so Giovanni Lanza 72, 10131 Torino
T: +39 011 660 5039
F: +39 011 198 26822
www.xeffe.it
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:58 P
Hi Shawn,
I'm looking for the docs num from the core overview page and the situation
is:
Num Docs: 35031923Max Doc: 35156879
The difference doesn't explain the strange behavior.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/26/2015 11:21 AM, Luca Quarello
Hi,
I have a SOLR 5.3.1 CLOUD with two nodes and 8 shards per node.
Each shard is about* 35 million documents (**35025882**) and 16GB sized.*
- I launch the SPLIT command on a shard (shard 13) in the ASYNC way:
curl "
http://x-perf-jvm5:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=SPLITSHARD&collectio
10 matches
Mail list logo
