..
thanks
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Tor Henning Ueland
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Lord Khan Han
> wrote:
> > Is there anyway to get correct Qtime when we use http caching ? I think
> Solr
> > caching also the Qtime so giving the the same Qtime in res
to do anything here.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Lord Khan Han
> wrote:
> > We are using this Qtime field and publishing in our front web. Even the
> > httpCache decreasing the Qtime in reality, its still using the cached old
> > Qtime valu
, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Lord Khan Han wrote:
> Thanks Erick.. If I figure out something I will let you know also.. No
> body replied except you I thought there might be more people involve here..
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>&g
t;correct"
> it?
>
> That said, I have no clue how you'd attempt to
> do this.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Lord Khan Han
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anyway to get correct Qtime when we use http caching ? I th
Hi,
Is there anyway to get correct Qtime when we use http caching ? I think Solr
caching also the Qtime so giving the the same Qtime in response what ever
takes it to finish .. How I can set Qtime correcly from solr when I use
http caching On.
thanks
Any idea ?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Lord Khan Han wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The no-op run completed in 20 minutes. The only commented line was
> "solr.addBean(doc)" We've tried SUSS as a drop in replacement for
> CommonsHttpSolrServer but it's behavior was we
beyond 500-700 docs/minute?
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Hadoop - HBase
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> >
> >From: Lord Khan Han
> >To: solr-user@l
Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
> >
> >From: Lord Khan Han
> >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 7:09 AM
> >Subject: SOLR Index Speed
> >
> >Hi,
> >
how big are your index files?
> 3) as others have recently written, make sure you don't give your JRE so
> much memory that your OS is starved for memory to use for file system cache.
>
> JRJ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lord Khan Han [mailto:khanuniver...@g
index
machine resources.
I gave 12 gig heap to solr and machine is not swapping.
I couldnt figure out the problem if there is..
PS: We are committing at the end of the submit.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Lord Khan Han wrote:
> Sorry :) it is not 500 doc per sec. ( It is what i wis
; ~32.
> What happens to your CPU load and indexing speed then?
>
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
> >
> >From: Lord Khan Han
> >
Hi,
We have 500K web document and usind solr (trunk) to index it. We have
special anaylizer which little bit heavy cpu .
Our machine config:
32 x cpu
32 gig ram
SAS HD
We are sending document with 16 reduce client (from hadoop) to the stand
alone solr server. the problem is we couldnt get speedi
n the debug component?
>
> Sorry I can't be more help here, but nothing really
> jumps out.
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Lord Khan Han
> wrote:
> > Below the output of the debug. I am measuring pure solr qtime which show
> in
> > the Q
e QTime of the returned response?
> (which is the time actually spent searching) or the time until
> the response gets back to the client, which may involve lots besides
> searching...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Lord Khan Han
> wrote:
> >
d loading is enabled?
> >
> >
> >
> > Best
> > Erick
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Lord Khan Han
> wrote:
> >> Another insteresting thing is : all one word or more word queries
> including
> >> phrase queries such as &quo
Another insteresting thing is : all one word or more word queries including
phrase queries such as "barack obama" slower in shingle configuration. What
i am doing wrong ? without shingle "barack obama" Querytime 300ms with
shingle 780 ms..
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 7:58 PM,
andler?
>
> What is the parsed query (from the debugQuery response)?
>
> Have you tried this with Solr 3.3 to see if there's any appreciable
> difference?
>
>Erik
>
> On Aug 27, 2011, at 09:34 , Lord Khan Han wrote:
>
> > When grouping off the query
, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Please confirm is this is caused by grouping. Turn grouping off, what's
> query time like?
>
>
> On Aug 27, 2011, at 07:27 , Lord Khan Han wrote:
>
> > On the other hand We couldnt use the cache for below types queries. I
> th
On the other hand We couldnt use the cache for below types queries. I think
its caused from grouping. Anyway we need to be sub second without cache.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Lord Khan Han wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Here the solr log capture.:
>
> *
query time is half of the current shingle one
!. Shouldn't be shingled index better for such heavy 2 word phrases search
? I am confused.
On the other hand One of the on the shelf big FAT companies search engine
doing the same query same machine 0.7 / 0.8 secs without cache . I am
confiden
Hi,
We are indexing news document from the various sites. Currently we have
200K docs indexed. Total index size is 36 gig. There is also attachement to
the news (pdf -docs etc) So document size could be high (ie 10mb).
We are using some complex queries which includes around 30 - 40 terms per
qu
Hi ,
Can I limit the terms that the HighlightComponent uses. My query is
generally long and I want specific ones to be highlighted and the rest is
not highlighted. Is there an option like the SpellCheckComponent. it uses q
unless spellcheck.q if specified. Is a hl.q parameter possible?
Or any o
Hi ,
Can I limit the terms that the HighlightComponent uses. My query is
generally long and I want specific ones to be highlighted and the rest is
not highlighted. Is there an option like the SpellCheckComponent. it uses q
unless spellcheck.q if specified. Is a hl.q parameter possible?
Or an
23 matches
Mail list logo
