Re: Ordering updates

2008-12-04 Thread Laurence Rowe
2008/12/4 Shalin Shekhar Mangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If each CMS process has a consistent view of the data and it wishes to > update Solr with that data, where is the question of inconsistency here? Because it is difficult to guarantee the order of processing across a distributed system while m

Re: Ordering updates

2008-12-04 Thread Laurence Rowe
overwrites the old document > with the new one if an old document with the same uniqueKey exists in the > index. > > Does that answer your question? > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Our CMS is dis

Ordering updates

2008-12-03 Thread Laurence Rowe
Hi, Our CMS is distributed over a cluster and I was wandering how I can ensure that index records of newer versions of documents are never overwritten by older ones. Amazon AWS uses a timestamp on requests to ensure 'eventual consistency' of operations. Is there a way to supply a transaction ID wi