ard": "#EACH","node":
> "#ANY"}]}'
>
> curl
> '
> http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=BACKUP&name=myBackupName&collection=gettingstarted&location=/choose/location/
> '
> curl
> '
> http://loca
contacting me about this.
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:04 PM Houston Putman
wrote:
> From my experience, you need all nodes to have access to the shared
> storage.
> Solr will pick which nodes should write each shard's data, and you do not
> have a lot of c
ed at the same path on all nodes, or HDFS."
Honestly, I must have missed it. I do not recall it being there before.
I guess that answers my question.
Thank you for contacting me back about this anyway.
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:43 AM Aroop Ganguly
wrote:
which the backup data will be written.
This means that the host writing the backup data doesn't have all the data
on its local filesystem.
Is this a problem?
By which I mean: will data not present on that host be retrieved over the
network?
What happens in this case?
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
Indeed, only Oracle JDK is affected by the commercial license, not OpenJDK,
as can be read here: https://www.baeldung.com/oracle-jdk-vs-openjdk
Point 5 specifically.
Also explained here:
https://www.quora.com/Does-using-OpenJDK-provide-a-way-to-be-safe-from-Oracle-Java-Licensing-fee
On Fri, Jan
is true. Try it
>
> > On Nov 21, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Koen De Groote
> wrote:
> >
> > Erick:
> >
> > No suggesters. There is 1 spellchecker for
> >
> > text_general
> >
> > But no buildOnCommit or buildOnStartup setting mentioned anywher
still take a while.
>
> Shot in the dark….
>
> Erick
>
> > On Nov 21, 2019, at 4:03 AM, Koen De Groote
> wrote:
> >
> > The logs files showed a startup, printing of all the config options that
> > had been set, 1 or 2 commands that got executed and the
esents the aggregated elapsed time when the
> handler was processing requests (ie. not including all other elapsed time
> when the handler was just sitting idle). Perhaps a better name for this
> metric would be “totalProcessingTime”.
>
> > On 19 Nov 2019, at 17:35, Koen De Groot
rchestration that is blocking requests for some
> minutes?
>
> > Am 20.11.2019 um 10:32 schrieb Koen De Groote <
> koen.degro...@limecraft.com>:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I was testing some backup/restore scenarios.
> >
> > 1 of them is Solr7.6
king about 20GB of data here, so not very much, but not little
either.
Is it normal that it takes so long before solr responds? If not, what
should I look at in order to find the cause?
I have asked this before recently, though the wording was confusing. This
should be clearer.
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
easy_reading_${jetty.port:8983}
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
n of metrics. The ref guide has information on now to trim
> down what you’re looking at.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Nov 19, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Koen De Groote
> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I've enabled JMX metrics on an install of mine and a
s,scope=/schema
What am I looking at here?
I can't find a single page explaining what the significance of these
metrics is.
Nor can I find a page that basically says "You'll want to monitor X, Y and
Z get a good view of your cluster".
Can anyone provide an example?
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
ble automatically rebuilding
> after restore?
>
> > Am 15.11.2019 um 16:36 schrieb Koen De Groote <
> koen.degro...@limecraft.com>:
> >
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > I was testing some backup/restore scenarios.
> >
> > 1 of them is Solr7.6 in a docker co
hing’s blocked until the restore is done, although 10 minutes for 20G
> seems excessive.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Nov 15, 2019, at 10:35 AM, Koen De Groote <
> koen.degro...@limecraft.com> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > I was testing some
ponds? If not, what
should I look at in order to find the cause?
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
could not before.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Koen De Groote
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:51 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> There’s the preferredLeader property, see:
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/collections-api.html
>
> That said, this was put in for situations where there
rules for this?
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
Is "it" a hard limit, sorry.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:35 PM Koen De Groote
wrote:
> The error was a zookeeper connect timeout. Which apparently is hardcoded
> to 180 seconds.
>
> I've recently succeeded in the restore. It may well have been a connection
> iss
>
> Intelligent Offentlig Samhandel
> *Før, under og efter udbud*
>
> *Følg UdbudsVagten og markedet her Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/groups?groupDashboard=&gid=1862353> *
>
>
> Den tor. 17. okt. 2019 kl. 10.06 skrev Koen De Groote <
> koen.degro...@li
Both to the same network drive, sorry.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:05 AM Koen De Groote
wrote:
> Yes, both servers back up to a network drive.
>
> However, that is not the point of my question.
>
> The point of my question is: If I execute the curl command, that contacts
> t
Parken - Tårn D - 5. Sal
> Øster Allé 48 | DK - 2100 København
>
> <http://dk.linkedin.com/in/JonKjaerAmundsen/>
>
> Intelligent Offentlig Samhandel
> *Før, under og efter udbud*
>
> *Følg UdbudsVagten og markedet her Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/groups?groupDashboard
ver2. All other
collections had their leader on server1. All collections had 1 replica, on
the other server.
I would think that having the replica there would be enough to perform a
restore.
Or does the backup need to happen on the actual leader?
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
I also ran into this while researching cluster policies. Solr 7.6
Except same situation: introduce a rule to control placement of
collections. Backup. Delete. Restore. Solr complains it can't do it.
I don't need them just yet, so I stopped there, but reading this is quite
disturbing.
Does deleti
t switching "query" alias to restored collection, and then nuking
> the old one?
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:52 PM Koen De Groote <
> koen.degro...@limecraft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings.
> >
> > Solr 7.6, cloud.
> >
> > From what I&
rst is rather scary
and sounds like downtime for a restore is unavoidable.
So, how to properly restore?
Kind regards,
Koen De Groote
7;m trying to find a command I can run, with
a specification in it, and once solr receives that, it starts re-arranging
things on its own.
It's probably just the case that I'm not properly understanding what's
required to properly orchestrate this.
Thanks in advance,
Koen De Groote
Hello,
I'm looking into how I can move a collection to a specific machine.
I have a set of machines, some with more/less CPU/RAM/Disk Space.
Basically, I want to either move the specific collection to the appropriate
machine(s). Or somehow say in the configuration "collection X is to only
exist
Thanks for that, and for your time.
Kind regards,
Koen
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:33 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/11/2019 6:44 PM, Koen De Groote wrote:
> > I gathered a solr log from 7.6.0 at TRACE level.
> >
> > Then I replicated the experiment with 6.6.5 and w
Koen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:21 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/11/2019 2:40 PM, Koen De Groote wrote:
> > That being explained, am I right in understanding that currently there is
> > no way of configuring Solr so that it won't delete the folders, in this
> > event?
&g
lr(java) process, performing syscall "unlink" and "rmdir" on the
specific files and directories.
Regards,
Koen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:00 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/11/2019 3:17 AM, Koen De Groote wrote:
> > The basic steps are: set up zookeeper, set up sol
m
> replicated.
>
> -Gus
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:37 PM Koen De Groote >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently ran in to the following scenario:
> >
> > Solr, version 7.5, in a docker container, running as cloud, with an
> > externa
Hello,
I recently ran in to the following scenario:
Solr, version 7.5, in a docker container, running as cloud, with an
external zookeeper ensemble of 3 zookeepers. Instructions were followed to
make a root first, this was set correctly, as could be seen by the solr
logs outputting the connect in
33 matches
Mail list logo
