do the right thing" in terms of refreshing itself.
>
> FWIW,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Kevin Osborn
> wrote:
> > I have created a PostFilter. PostFilter creates a DelegatingCollector,
> > which provides a Lucene IndexSearcher.
> >
> > How
I have created a PostFilter. PostFilter creates a DelegatingCollector,
which provides a Lucene IndexSearcher.
However, I need to query for an object that may or may not be located on
the shard that I am filtering on.
Normally, I would do something like:
searcher.search(new TermQuery(new Term("fi
ering in,
it works fine. I retrieve the object and do my intersections. But, on the
other shard, I don't have my user document. So, I have nothing to intersect
with.
That is a separate issue that I need to figure out.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Kevin Osborn
wrote:
> A little mor
the filter is called for any documents on the second shard.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Osborn
wrote:
> I developed a post filter. My documents to be filtered are on two
> different shards. So, in a single-shard environment,
> DelegatingCollector.doSetNextReader is called t
I developed a post filter. My documents to be filtered are on two different
shards. So, in a single-shard environment,
DelegatingCollector.doSetNextReader is called twice. And collect is called
the correct number of times. Everything went well and I got my correct
number of results back.
So, I the
to match "true" and "false" and
> > replace them with "0" and "1" ?
> >
> >
> > : Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:57:03 -0700
> > : From: Kevin Osborn
> > : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > : To: solr-user@lucen
I was hoping to use DocValues, but one of my fields is a boolean, which is
not currently supported by DocValues. I can use a copyField to convert my
boolean to a string. Is there is anyway to use a copyField to convert from
a boolean to a tint?
RDS).map(b =>
NumericUtils.prefixCodedToLong(docValues.lookupOrd(b))).toSet
Basically, we set the document, then iterate through the Ords. And then
convert the BytesRef to a long.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Kevin Osborn
wrote:
> getSortedNumeric throws the following exception:
>
> unexpected docvalu
getSortedNumeric throws the following exception:
unexpected docvalues type SORTED_SET for field 'space_list' (expected one
of [SORTED_NUMERIC, NUMERIC]). Use UninvertingReader or index with
docvalues.
If I am reading the doumentation correctly, getSortedNumeric sorts the
values, but it is still f
If I am finding the values of a long field for a single numeric field, I
just do:
DocValues.getNumeric(contex.reader(), "myField").get(docNumber). This
returns the value of the field and everything is good.
However, my field is a multi-valued long field. So, I need to do:
DocValues.getSortedSet(
ck suggestion would at least tell us if it's
> the issue we think it is.
>
> FWIW,
> Erick
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Mark Miller
> wrote:
>
> > It would be great if you could give this patch a try:
> > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=aaRWwSGP
&
t; On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
>
> > I was having problems updating SolrCloud with a large batch of records.
> The
> > records are coming in bursts with lulls between updates.
> >
> > At first, I just tried large updates of 100,000 records at a t
help me understand where to look next.
> 3) It seems all threads in this state are waiting for
> "0x0007216e68d8", is there a way to tell what "0x0007216e68d8" is?
> 4) Is there a limit to how many updates you can do in SolrCloud?
> 5) Wild-ass-theory: would more shards provide more locks (whatever they
> are) on update, and thus more update throughput?
>
> To those interested, I've provided a stacktrace of 1 of 3 nodes at this
> URL in gzipped form:
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/timvaillancourt.com/tmp/solr-jstack-2013-08-23.gz
>
> Any help/suggestions/ideas on this issue, big or small, would be much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks so much all!
>
> Tim Vaillancourt
>
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310.4677 SKYPE osbornk
5 Park Plaza, Suite 600, Irvine, CA 92614
[image: CNET Content Solutions]
ection.java:255)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154)
It basically appears that Solr gets stuck while trying to acquire a
semaphore that never becomes available.
Anyone have any ideas? This is definitely causing major problems for us.
I may have a bit of good news. The ulimit of open files was set to 4096. I
just chose a random high limit (10) and it seems to be working better
now. I still have more testing to do though, but the initial results are
hopeful.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote
, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> Thanks so much for your help and for the explanations. Eventually, we will
> be doing several batches in parallel. But at least now I know where to look
> and can do some testing on various scenarios.
>
> Since we may be doing a lot of
gt; > with the same frequency, but it still isn't free. It's still
> > good to have the soft commit interval as long as you
> > can tolerate.
> >
> > It's perfectly reasonable to have a hard commit interval
> > that's much shorter than your soft commit int
logging and how it's managed when your hard commit occurs.
>
> If you can give that a try and let us know how that fares we might have
> some further input to share.
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
>
> > I am using Solr Cloud 4.4. It i
server as well.
I had also noticed similar behavior before with Solr 4.3. It definitely has
something do with the clustering, but I am not sure what. And I don't see
any error message (or really anything else) in the Solr logs.
Thanks.
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solu
struct an AND-based query that hits about as many
> documents as your slow OR query.
>
> With an index size of just 9GB, I am surprised that you use sharding.
> Have you tried using just a single instance to avoid the merge-overhead?
>
> - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Li
to-1-tp4073797.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310.4677 SKYPE osbornk
5 Park Plaza, Suite 600, Irvine, CA 92614
[image: CNET Content Solutions]
solrj.**SolrServerException: Server at
> http://127.0.0.1:8087/solr430/**medline<http://127.0.0.1:8087/solr430/medline>returned
> non ok status:400, message:Bad Request
>QueryResponse solrRes = solrServer.query( new SolrQuery( q ) );
>long found = solrRes.getResults().**getNumFoun
just a slave that could be a repeater.
>
> You say that sending the data in both directions is not idea, but it works
> and is conceptually very simple. What is the reasoning behind wanting to
> get away from that approach?
>
> Jason
>
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Kevin
formance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Kevin Osborn
> wrote:
> > We are going to have two datacenters, each with their own SolrCloud and
> > ZooKeeper quorums. The end result will be that they should be replicas of
>
use replication to push or pull data
from one datacenter to another?
In my case, NRT is not a requirement. And I will also be dealing with about
3 collections and 5 or 6 shards.
Thanks.
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310.4677
collections separately in each data center. And
then use Solr's replication update handler to transfer data from one
datacenter to another?
Is there any other suggested method that we should investigate?
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310
hanks.
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310.4677 SKYPE osbornk
5 Park Plaza, Suite 600, Irvine, CA 92614
[image: CNET Content Solutions]
e instance
directory. I see this is available for Core Admin, but I don't see it for
the Collections API itself.
Or failing that, solr.xml would be better.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks.
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310.
10:48 AM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
>
>> I am looking to export a large amount of data from Solr. This export will
>> be done by a Java application and then written to file. Initially, I was
>> thinking of using direct HTTP calls and using the CSV response writer. And
>> then m
, with SolrCloud, I prefer to use SolrJ due to its communication with
Zookeeper. Is there any way to use the CSV response writer with SolrJ?
Would the overhead of using SolrJ's "solrbin" format be much slower than
the CSV response writer?
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINE
or alpha to 4 at some
> point?
>
> - Mark
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Kevin Osborn
> wrote:
> > It looks like this is where the problem lies. Here is the JSON that SolrJ
> > is receiving from Zookeeper:
> >
> > "data":"{\\"manuf
ection\\":\\"manufacturer\\",\\n
\\"node_name\\":\\"myhost:5275_solr\\",\\n \\"base_url\\":\\"
http://myhost:5275/solr\\",\\n
\\"leader\\":\\"true\\"}"}},{"data":{
Where SolrJ is expecting th
so tried an
external Zookeeper with the same results.
--
*KEVIN OSBORN*
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CNET Content Solutions
OFFICE 949.399.8714
CELL 949.310.4677 SKYPE osbornk
5 Park Plaza, Suite 600, Irvine, CA 92614
[image: CNET Content Solutions]
is not a range, but that is the type of scoring I want. I suspect that
would make it much faster, but am not sure if that is possible. Thanks.
--
KEVIN OSBORN
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
T 949.399.8714 C 949.310.4677
5 Park Plaza, Suite 600, Irvine, CA 92614
would have the access information. So, the number of unique terms on the
key would be quite high. Would this be too slow?
If someone has any knowledge about the performance issues on these two
methods, please give an advice. Thanks.
--
KEVIN OSBORN
LEAD SOFTWARE ENGINEER
T 949.399.8714 C
I have a data import handler that is importing data in full mode from SQL
Server. It has one main entity and three sub-entities. Against a good database,
it appears to open 4 connections total. One for the main query and the other 3
subqueries just re-use their connections. This works well enoug
ably don't care much because this data is only referenced when you
assemble a document for return to the client, it's irrelevant for searching.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> Please verify my understanding. I have a field called "category" a
Please verify my understanding. I have a field called "category" and it has a
value "computers". If I use this same field and value for all of my documents,
it is really only stored on disk once because "category:computers" is a unique
term. Is this correct?
But, what about multi-valued fields.
I am not sure if I can use function queries this way. I have a query like
this"attributeX:[* TO ?]" in my DB. I replace the ? with input from the front
end. Obviously, this works fine. However, what I really want to do is
"attributeX:[* TO (3 * ?)]" Is there anyway to embed the results of a func
My project has a couple custom caches that descend from FastLRUCache. These
worked fine in Solr 1.3. Then I started migrating my project to Solr 1.4.1 and
had problems during startup.
I believe the problem is that I attempt to access the core in the init process.
I currently use the deprecated
I have a multi-core environment and a custom request handler. However, I have
one place where I would like to have my request handler on coreA query to
coreB.
This is not distributed search. This is just an independent query to get some
additional data.
I am also guaranteed that each server wi
Pretty much every one of my queries is going to be unique. However, the query
is fairly complex and also contains both unique and non-unique data. In the
query, some fields will be unique (e.g description), but other fields will be
fairly common (e.g. category). If we could use those common fiel
In our case, we had specific matching that we needed to return, so I can't
really contribute this to the code base, but we did get this working.
Basically, we have a custom request handler. After it receives the search
results, we then send this to our matcher algorithm. We then go through each
Stemmer, Porter, etc)? I'm unsure of which stemmer would
work best. Thanks again!
Kevin Osborn-2 wrote:
>
> I used it mostly for KStemmer, but I also liked the fact that it included
> about a dozen or so stable patches since Solr 1.4 was released. We just
> use the included WAR in
I used it mostly for KStemmer, but I also liked the fact that it included about
a dozen or so stable patches since Solr 1.4 was released. We just use the
included WAR in our project however. We don't use the installer or anything
like that.
From: blargy
To:
If my query were something like this: "select col1, col2 from table", my
dynamic field would be something like "fld_${col1}". But I could not find any
information on how to setup the DIH with dynamic fields. I saw that dynamic
fields should be supported with SOLR-742, but am not sure how to proc
Not sure if it will solve your specific problem. We use Solr as a WAR as well
as Solrj. So the main solr distribution comes with slf4j-jdk-1.5.5.jar. I just
deleted that and replaced it with slf4j-log4j12-1.5.5.jar. And then it used my
existing log4j.properties file.
___
I too wish it worked this way, but it doesn't. I believe that this all takes
places within Lucene, so there is no concept of single values or multi-valued
fields. They are all just terms. The same is true with term frequency. In my
case, I set omitNorms=true and then created a custom similarity
Like you, all of my research has come to the conclusion of "it depends". For
this particular product, we have an index of a million documents or so. And
each document can belong to many catalogs. Initially, it will be a small
number, but there could be up to 200 or so catalogs (probably much les
proach described there?
>
>
>Otis
>Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
>Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
>
>
>
>- Original Message
>> From: Kevin Osborn
>> To: Solr
>> Sent: Fri, February 19, 2010 6:06:51
So, I am looking at better ways to filter a resultset by catalog. So, I have an
index of products. And based on the user, I want to filter the search results
to what they are allowed to see. I will probably have up to 200 or so different
catalogs.
The PositionFilter worked great for my purpose along with another filter that I
build.
In my case, my indexed data may be something like "X150". So, a query for
"Nokia X150" should match. But I don't want random matches on "x". However, if
my indexed data is "G7", I do want a query on "PowerSho
Erick
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> I am seeing this in several of my fields. I have something like "Samsung
> X150" or "Nokia BH-212". And my query will not match on X150 or BH-212.
>
> So, my query is something like +model:(Samsung X150).
Right now if I have the query model:(Nokia BH-212V), the parser turns this into
+(model:nokia model:"bh 212 v"). The problem is that I might have a model
called Nokia BH-212, so this is completely missed. In my case, I would like my
query to be +(model:nokia model:bh model:212 model:v).
This is
It appears that
omitTermFreqAndPositions is indeed the culprit. I assume it has to do with the
fact that the index parsing of BH-212 puts multiple terms in the same position.
From: Kevin Osborn
To: Solr
Sent: Fri, February 12, 2010 5:28:08 PM
Subject
I am seeing this in several of my fields. I have something like "Samsung
X150" or "Nokia BH-212". And my query will not match on X150 or BH-212.
So, my query is something like +model:(Samsung X150). Through debugQuery, I see
that this gets converted to +(model:samsung model:"x 150"). It
matches
Thanks. Is there any performance penalty vs. LongField? I don't need to do any
range queries on these value. I am basically treating them as numerical
strings. I thought it would just be a shortcut to strip leading zeros, which I
can easily do on my own.
From
This is in Solr 1.3.
I have some text in our database in the form 0088698183939. The leading zeros
are useless, but I want to able to search it with no leading zeros or several
leading zeros. So, I decided to index this as a long, expecting it to just
store it as a number. But, instead, I see t
If my query is something like manufacturer:IBM OR productTitle:Thinkpad, I
actually just want to printout "IBM" or "Thinkpad" in any of the highlighted
fields. I don't want to parse through any HTML or other text. Basically, I just
want to know which of the terms in my query matched and in which
BTW, the search will always be in a single language.
From: Kevin Osborn
To: Solr
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:23:43 PM
Subject: multiple languages in result set
As of Solr 1.3, it looks like my choices for searching in multiple languages
are either one
As of Solr 1.3, it looks like my choices for searching in multiple languages
are either one language per core or using different fields per language
(productTitle_en, productTitle_de, etc.). However, I may want my results back
in multiple languages as well. For example, I could search for a term
r not matching
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> Looks like the format didn't come through in the email. ch, vxrch, and
> cisco7204xvrch are all in position 4.
Ah... the traditional way to "handle" that case is to use a little
slop with the phrase query.
-Yonik
not matching
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
>
> I have a manufacturer part number: CISCO7204VXR-CH. The indexer produces:
>
> 12 3 4
> cisco7204vxrch
>vxrch
>cisco7204vxrch
I have a manufacturer part number: CISCO7204VXR-CH. The indexer produces:
12 3 4
cisco7204vxrch
vxrch
cisco7204vxrch
If I query on CISCO7204VXR-CH, I get:
12 3 4
cisco7204vxrch
Everyt
, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> We built our own webapp that used the Solr JARs. We used Apache Commons/log4j
> logging and just put log4j.properties in the Resin conf directory. The
> commons-logging and log4j jars were put in the Resin lib driectory.
> Everything worked grea
We built our own webapp that used the Solr JARs. We used Apache Commons/log4j
logging and just put log4j.properties in the Resin conf directory. The
commons-logging and log4j jars were put in the Resin lib driectory. Everything
worked great and we got log files for our code only.
So, I upgraded
ation.com
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> I am trying to figure this out. I have a firstSearcher and a newSearcher
> event. They are almost identical. Upon startup, I see all the firstSearcher
> events in my log. I also see log events for Added SolrEventLis
I am trying to figure this out. I have a firstSearcher and a newSearcher event.
They are almost identical. Upon startup, I see all the firstSearcher events in
my log. I also see log events for Added SolrEventListener for both
firstSearcher and newSearcher.
Next, I push out a new index. I see th
My index has a category field and I would like to apply a negative boost to
certain categories. For example, if I search for "thinkpad", it should push
results for the laptop bag and other accessory categories to the bottom.
So, I first tried altering the bq field with category:(batteries bags
How would I handle a search for 21" or 3'. The " and ' symbols appear to get
stripped away by Lucene before passing the query off to the analyzers.
Here is my analyzer in the schema.xml:
I could certainly replace X" with X inch using regex in my custom request
handler. B
We had similar problems and then switched to KStem and have been pretty happy
with the results.
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/cgi-bin/downloads/downloads.cgi
- Original Message
From: Jason Rennie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 2:23:36 PM
, 2008 1:41:50 PM
Subject: Re: QueryResultsCache and DocSet filter
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem here is that the calls in SolrIndexSearcher don't appear to use
> the QueryResultsCache if the filer is a DocSet rather th
We have a bunch of user caches that return DocSet objects. So, we intersect
them and send a DocSet filter and the actual query to getDocListAndSet or
getDocList. The problem here is that the calls in SolrIndexSearcher don't
appear to use the QueryResultsCache if the filer is a DocSet rather than
ee the methods on FieldType, esp toExternal()
-Yonik
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As part of my results, I am building a lot of facet information. For example,
> an Attribute ID also needs to return the Attribute Text.
>
> So, I have
As part of my results, I am building a lot of facet information. For example,
an Attribute ID also needs to return the Attribute Text.
So, I have code like the following (really in a cache):
Term term = new Term ("AtrID", "A0001");
Document doc = searcher.doc(searcher.getFirstMatch(term));
retu
In v1.3, it is public. In v1.2, it is still protected.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:50:22 PM
Subject: Re: DocSet to BitSet
: That is more or less what I did. Once I found that function, it ju
That is more or less what I did. Once I found that function, it just took a
small patch to expose that functionality, and then the problem was solved.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:32:56 PM
Su
One of the primary reasons that I was doing it this way is because I am sending
several filters, one is a big docset and others are BooleanQuery objects
(products in stock, etc.).
Since, the interface for SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListAndSet supports only
(Query, DocSet,...) or (Query, List,...),
I have a custom query object that extends ContstantScoreQuery. I give it a key
which pulls some documents out of a cache. Thinking to make it more efficient,
I used DocSet, backed by OpenBitSet or OpenHashSet. However, I need to set the
BitSet object for the Lucene filter. Any idea on how to bes
There is nothing super special that you need to do to get KStem compiled.
However, you will need the Solr JAR file on your classpath when you compile
KStem.
You can do this on command-line, ANT, Eclipse, etc. This will produce the class
files. It will also be the easiest to use if you put this
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 6:03:34 PM
Subject: Re: complex queries
On May 6, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> I don't think this is possible, but I figure that I would ask.
>
I don't think this is possible, but I figure that I would ask.
So, I want to find documents that match a search term and where a field in
those documents are also in the results of a subquery. Basically, I am looking
for the Solr equivalent of doing a SQL IN clause.
As I said, I don't think it
I thought of that method. The problem I was thinking of is that if a new
customer is added, that could potentially cause an update of about 2,000,000
records or so. Fortunately, this does not happen everyday. It also make
indexing a little difficult because I now have to check permissions on eac
I have an index of about 3,000,000 products and about 8500 customers. Each
customers has access to about 50 to about 500,000 of the products.
Our current method was using a bitset in the filter. So, for each customer,
they have a bitset in the cache. For each docId that they have access to, the
PM
Subject: Re: IOException: read past EOF during optimize phase
This may be a Lucene bug... IIRC, I saw at least one other lucene user
with a similar stack trace. I think the latest lucene version (2.3
dev) should fix it if that's the case.
-Yonik
On Jan 16, 2008 3:07 PM, Kevin Osborn &
-slave
setup. This will separate your indexing from searching. Don't have the
URL, but it's on zee Wiki.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent:
s
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Solr
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:07:23 PM
Subject: IOException: read past EOF during optimize phase
I am using the embedded Solr API for my indexing
I am using the embedded Solr API for my indexing process. I created a brand new
index with my application without any problem. I then ran my indexer in
incremental mode. This process copies the working index to a temporary Solr
location, adds/updates any records, optimizes the index, and then co
At 10,000 documents per post, I was actually finding that embedded Solr was
providing a significant performance boost. It has been a while since I did any
comparisons, but it was probably on the order of 40% or so.
- Original Message
From: climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@
is exactly the same as
39f
-Yonik
On 6/14/07, Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a
> single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a sfloat.
>
> If my query restricts the resultset
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a
single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a sfloat.
If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet count on
Field1, then the number of records returned is 47640. And if I sum up the facet
co
I had a similar issue with a heavy use of dynamic fields. You first want to get
those spaces out of there. Lucene does not like spaces in field names. So, I
just replaced the space with a rarely used character (ASCII 8 or something like
that). I did this in my indexing. And then I just translate
I don't have any pointers, but I would love to have this feature.
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:23:02 AM
Subject: Alphabetical Facets
Has anyone given any thought to alphabetical faceting?
I'd like
range. I couldn't find this
information in the Lucene documentation.
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 9:56:18 AM
Subject: Re: listing dynamic field in search results
On 4/12/07, Kevin Osborn <[E
I discovered the issue. Some of my dynamic field names have spaces in them. If
I replace ' ' with '_', then it works fine. This really isn't a great solution,
since a '_' could be a legitimate part of the field name. I tried enclosing the
entire field name with quotes, so the query is:
http://l
I have quite a few dynamic fields. However, I will usually only want to return
just a couple of those fields.
So, if my static fields are StaticField1 and StaticField2 and my dynamic fields
are s_DynamicField1, sf_DynamicField2, etc., the following line will work as
expected:
http://localhost:
- Original Message
From: Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:20:40 PM
Subject: Re: maximum index size
If you are going to store a document for each customer then some field
must indicate to which customer the document instance b
97 matches
Mail list logo
