RE: problems with search in solr

2012-03-22 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
Remove the stemmer filter. "Caso" and "casa" are transformed into "cas" if you use the stemmer filter. En español: Quita el filtro de stemmer, que se usa para sacar la raiz de las palabras, pero en tu caso la raíz de "casa" y "caso" es la misma, "cas". Un saludo. __

RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-03-20 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
Some versions of the OpenJDK doesn´t include the Rhino Engine to run javascript dataimport. You have to use the Oracle JDK. Juampa. De: randolf.julian [randolf.jul...@dominionenterprises.com] Enviado el: martes, 20 de marzo de 2012 5:41 Para: solr-user@luc

RE: Solr Optimization Fail

2011-12-16 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
Maybe you are generating a snapshot of your index attached to the optimize ??? Look for post-commit or post-optimize events in your solr-config.xml De: Rajani Maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] Enviado el: viernes, 16 de diciembre de 2011 11:11 Para: solr-user@l

Re: Grouping or Facet ?

2011-12-09 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
eld. So it would help me if you showed the output of faceting on a >>>> single >>>> category field and why that didn't work for you >>>> >>>> But either way, faceting will probably outperform grouping. >>>> >>

RE: Grouping or Facet ?

2011-12-05 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
De: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com] Enviado el: lunes, 05 de diciembre de 2011 14:48 Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Asunto: Re: Grouping or Facet ? Why not just use the first form of the document and just facet.field=category? You'll get two diffe

Grouping or Facet ?

2011-12-03 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
I need to do some counts on a StrField field to suggest options from two different categories, and I don´t know what option is the best: My schema looks: - id - name - category: XX or YY with Grouping I do: http://localhost:8983/?q=name:prefix*&group=true&group.field=category But I can change

Highlight, Dismax and local params

2011-04-18 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
Hello, I think I have found something extrange with local params and edismax. If I do querys like : "params":{ "hl.requireFieldMatch":"true", "hl.fragsize":"200", "json.wrf":"callback0", "indent":"on", "hl.fl":"domicilio,deno", "wt":"json", "hl":"true",

Re: Matching on a multi valued field

2011-04-04 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
ian.l...@journalexperts.com>> wrote: Thank you all for your responses. The field had already been set up with positionIncrementGap=100 so I just needed to add in the slop. On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Juan Pablo Mora mailto:jua...@informa.es>> wrote: >> A multiValued field

Re: Matching on a multi valued field

2011-03-29 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
>> A multiValued field >> is actually a single field with all data separated with positionIncrement. >> Try setting that value high enough and use a PhraseQuery. That is true but you cannot do things like: q="bar* foo*"~10 with default query search. and if you use dismax you will have the same

RE: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

2011-03-21 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
I answered myself a similar question here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4037625/change-schema-in-solr-without-reindex I Hope it helps De: Marc SCHNEIDER [marc.schneide...@gmail.com] Enviado el: lunes, 21 de marzo de 2011 15:20 Para: solr-user@lucene