Remove the stemmer filter. "Caso" and "casa" are transformed into "cas" if you
use the stemmer filter.
En español:
Quita el filtro de stemmer, que se usa para sacar la raiz de las palabras, pero
en tu caso la raíz de "casa" y "caso" es la misma, "cas".
Un saludo.
__
Some versions of the OpenJDK doesn´t include the Rhino Engine to run javascript
dataimport. You have to use the Oracle JDK.
Juampa.
De: randolf.julian [randolf.jul...@dominionenterprises.com]
Enviado el: martes, 20 de marzo de 2012 5:41
Para: solr-user@luc
Maybe you are generating a snapshot of your index attached to the optimize ???
Look for post-commit or post-optimize events in your solr-config.xml
De: Rajani Maski [rajinima...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 16 de diciembre de 2011 11:11
Para: solr-user@l
eld. So it would help me if you showed the output of faceting on a
>>>> single
>>>> category field and why that didn't work for you
>>>>
>>>> But either way, faceting will probably outperform grouping.
>>>>
>>
De: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 05 de diciembre de 2011 14:48
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Grouping or Facet ?
Why not just use the first form of the document
and just facet.field=category? You'll get
two diffe
I need to do some counts on a StrField field to suggest options from two
different categories, and I don´t know what option is the best:
My schema looks:
- id
- name
- category: XX or YY
with Grouping I do:
http://localhost:8983/?q=name:prefix*&group=true&group.field=category
But I can change
Hello,
I think I have found something extrange with local params and edismax. If I do
querys like :
"params":{
"hl.requireFieldMatch":"true",
"hl.fragsize":"200",
"json.wrf":"callback0",
"indent":"on",
"hl.fl":"domicilio,deno",
"wt":"json",
"hl":"true",
ian.l...@journalexperts.com>> wrote:
Thank you all for your responses. The field had already been set up with
positionIncrementGap=100 so I just needed to add in the slop.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Juan Pablo Mora
mailto:jua...@informa.es>> wrote:
>> A multiValued field
>> A multiValued field
>> is actually a single field with all data separated with positionIncrement.
>> Try setting that value high enough and use a PhraseQuery.
That is true but you cannot do things like:
q="bar* foo*"~10 with default query search.
and if you use dismax you will have the same
I answered myself a similar question here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4037625/change-schema-in-solr-without-reindex
I Hope it helps
De: Marc SCHNEIDER [marc.schneide...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 21 de marzo de 2011 15:20
Para: solr-user@lucene
10 matches
Mail list logo